AI Spam Buster Tools - for Bitcointalk

[seoincorporation]

I know the tool has a cost, but to be honest, it's really cheap to use it with OpenAI, We are talking about something like 0.0001 (Or less) each time you make the analysis on the site. Paying $1 to analyze 1000 profiles shouldn't be considered as something expensive.

But other APIs like the AI detectors aren't cheap at all, i was reading about ZeroGPT and that one is like $0.25 for every 1000 words. Or something like that.

[Free Market Capitalist]

But other APIs like the AI detectors aren't cheap at all, i was reading about ZeroGPT and that one is like $0.25 for every 1000 words. Or something like that.

I've used then lots of times for free to report accounts in nutildah's thread. I think some of them have a limited number of free searches per month, but you can get around this by switching browsers, clearing your cookies, or simply using a different AI detector.

[seoincorporation]

Old Prompt:

Code:

const SYSTEM_PROMPT = `You are an expert AI text forensic analyst.

Your job is to estimate the probability that a text was generated by artificial intelligence rather than written by a human.

Evaluate the following signals:
- repetitive phrasing
- overly structured grammar
- generic explanations
- lack of personal anecdotes
- typical LLM sentence construction
- unnatural neutrality

Return ONLY a number between 0 and 100 representing the probability that the text was generated by AI.`;

const userPrompt = (text) =>
  `Analyze the following forum post and estimate the probability that it was written by AI.\n\nPOST:\n${text}\n\nReturn ONLY a number between 0 and 100.`;

New Prompt:

Code:

const SYSTEM_PROMPT = `You are a forensic AI text analyst specialized in detecting AI-generated content on cryptocurrency forums like BitcoinTalk.

Your task is to estimate the probability (0–100) that a forum post was generated by AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) rather than written by a human.

Evaluate the following signals, weighted by importance:

HIGH WEIGHT signals (strong indicators of AI authorship):
- Generic, balanced "on one hand / on the other hand" structure with no personal stance
- Closing with an open-ended question to simulate engagement (e.g., "What do you think?", "I'd love to hear your thoughts")
- Bullet-point-style reasoning embedded in flowing prose
- Overly formal or neutral tone inconsistent with typical forum culture
- Absence of typos, slang, abbreviations, or casual language typical of crypto communities
- Vague hedging phrases: "it's worth noting", "it's important to consider", "while X, Y must also be acknowledged"
- Vocabulary typical of LLMs: "fascinating", "revolutionized", "resilience", "innovative approach", "core principles", "at its core"

MEDIUM WEIGHT signals:
- No references to personal experience, wallet, trade, or specific event
- Generic Bitcoin/crypto praise without technical depth or original insight
- Perfectly structured paragraphs with intro, development, and conclusion
- Absence of emotional reaction, frustration, humor, or community in-jokes
- Advice that applies to any cryptocurrency post without context-specific nuance

LOW WEIGHT signals (supporting evidence only):
- Unusually high vocabulary and grammar quality compared to account history
- Post length disproportionate to topic complexity
- Mentions multiple coins or concepts without focusing on one

Return ONLY a number between 0 and 100.`;

const userPrompt = (text) =>
  `Analyze the following BitcoinTalk forum post and estimate the probability that it was written by AI.

POST:
${text}

Return ONLY a number between 0 and 100.`;

I would be interested to see what percentage of AI tools is shown on my posts, since I don't have API keys to check them myself.

Here is your result, congrats, you are human.


I would like to share another example of usage.







Even if it was a quote from an article, i detected an AI-generated content in less than 3 minutes.

[robelneo]

.. it's quite likely that some campaign managers will test it and perhaps start using it effectively.

That's true, brother, it will make things easy for campaign managers. In the past, it was spam; now it's AI-generated content, and there are AI tools that can produce AI-generated output that sounds human.

Paying $1 to analyze 1000 profiles shouldn't be considered as something expensive.

That's a good encouragement. This could be the next best Bitcointalk tool to wipe out AI-dependent users.

[Jankuokm]

I know the tool has a cost, but to be honest, it's really cheap to use it with OpenAI, We are talking about something like 0.0001 (Or less) each time you make the analysis on the site. Paying $1 to analyze 1000 profiles shouldn't be considered as something expensive.

But other APIs like the AI detectors aren't cheap at all, i was reading about ZeroGPT and that one is like $0.25 for every 1000 words. Or something like that.

I think you're right because using OpenAI is relatively cheap, especially if you have to do a large amount of analysis. But not all cases are just about cost. Sometimes AI detectors like ZeroGPT are designed for specific tasks. They may have higher accuracy or specialized features. So even if the price is a little higher, people will use them in some cases. OpenAI can do a lot of work, but it may not always be 100% reliable as a detector. So which one you use will depend on you. What do you need to do — a cheap solution, or specific accurate detection. Both have different use cases.

[yhiaali3]

That's a good encouragement. This could be the next best Bitcointalk tool to wipe out AI-dependent users.

Perhaps, but do you think it will really be effective, especially since it's not cheap?
Let's assume a campaign manager has between 20-40 participants who want to use this tool. How much extra money and time will it cost them? I don't think many campaign managers would prefer to use it.

In my opinion, detecting AI-generated content has become an obsession in the forum, to the point that some members do not participate in any discussions in the forum except to pursue the AI content creators.