A PoS model where the primary distribution mechanism is a centralized Discord bot that enforces a 7-day 'activity' tax is a red flag for any serious participant. It essentially transforms a blockchain asset into a custodial coupon system. If a user’s funds can be 'irreversibly lost' due to simple inactivity, the project lacks the fundamental principle of immutability that defines true cryptocurrency.
Furthermore, aiming for a NestEx listing while operating with an unlimited supply and a manual redistribution model raises concerns about long-term sell pressure and liquidity sustainability. Transparency isn't just about sharing a GitHub link; it’s about maintaining the integrity of private property on the chain—something that 'cleaning up inactive sub-accounts' directly contradicts. This feels less like a decentralized experiment and more like a managed database with extra steps.
Thank you for your feedback, you’re right. In the beginning, the cryptocurrency is controlled to prevent one person or a small group from taking over the network and controlling most of the staking power.
Dork Bot is just a simple tipping bot and should not be used to store large amounts of coins. Removing inactive accounts helps reduce fake accounts created only for farming and trying to gain too much staking power. Also, the distribution through Dork Bot on Discord is only part of the total supply. A large portion is still held by the creator and will be shared with people who support the project through donations, development, and paid collaborations with other big projects.
The project may seem unusual at the start, but that does not mean it cannot work or succeed.
People who understand how it works and trust the early distribution process will join and stay longer. Others will probably notice it later, after a few months, when the project starts getting more attention.
