Did you even read the bolded part? You are fast to point about failure of understanding Bitcoin but failed to comprehend what you are replying with.
Yes I did, you both are pretending that you know Bitcoin and parroting bullshit about Bitcoin. It is working as designed and is superior to anything in existence, any other claims are false. Luckily for you, this forum is run by a liberally sick individual who considers writing such idiocy as substantial posts. In any other environment you would be swiftly removed.

I think that right now, Bitcoin can be viewed as an investment asset that has the potential to generate profit, as well as a way to preserve capital against inflation.
Correct, and it is important to always note that those two things are separate concepts. Often people confuse these two.
Using Bitcoin as everyday money is difficult mainly because of its volatility, and I think that for daily transactions people will still prefer fiat currencies, which are less volatile even though they gradually lose value over time when simply held.
False. People are using the currencies that they are using because they have no choice, they are legally mandated and not because they have low volatility. The current volatility of Bitcoin is lower than the volatility of most fiat currencies aside the top most stable ones. Therefore to claim this nonsense in the current year is wrong. It has been true in the past, it is no longer true.
But even though we’re not using Bitcoin exactly the way it was originally intended, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that, because financial instruments can evolve and adapt to real-world conditions.
Also false. Just because you are not using something in every way that it can be used, that does not mean that something is "evolving". Bitcoin can be used as a payment method or money today without any issues. Those that claim otherwise are misleading and writing false nonsense. I use it as a payment method whenever the opportunity comes.
Bitcoin is faster but it's on off chain and when transaction are completed, they are settled on the main chain. The problem we have with lightning network is adoption compare to other state chain. If you ask me why most of this chain get transaction than Bitcoin lightning network is because many are there because of the return altcoins gives them. If you remove the gains altcoins give them, they will stop using most of them, check some of the alts gives returns and no longer generating fees again.
What the fuck is the statement in bold supposed to be? Compared to "other state chain"? What is that supposed to be, other blockchains or shitcoins? Lightning is more adopted as a payment method that any other altcoin, it does not even come close. I have never seen a shitcoin being accepted somewhere exclusively in person unless they have a method that allows them to accept most main cryptocurrencies, but that does not count.