i came across this post by NotATether and it is a very interest one and truly calls for concern but while responding to it, i got really curious and thought i should it for more better visibility as i believe not everyone would be able to see my response since its no longer the first page and below is the quote for both my response and post by NotATether
That topic is already 3 pages so far and you can continue there.
what do you guys really think about this ?
First of all, I wonder why you don't continue the discussion in that thread?
I already made a post over there on his thread an since the thread was already 3 pages down, I thought it right to create a new thread for more visibility as I think not everyone might get to see my response and possibly discuss it on that very thread and I also quoted my response on NotATether's thread down here so I don't think it should be much of an issue as people are already saying their opinions.
Your right of P2P won't be prevented since the heavily regulated exchange such as binance and bybit are all offering P2P market place but they will identify you, requiring KYC so that they can track where the money go.
It's not in anyone's interest to block the right of P2P if they can simply identify you. AML is a thing and they are more concerned with that and the reason why some P2P marketplace isn't really welcomed by government.
Thanks for your response but I was really thinking wild as morning is too difficult for the government especially when it seems like a threat to them, they might go any length to make such such innovations fail.
We all already know that, the government are very greedy set of people and I believe if there was no possible way for them to earn from crypto or if it was a direct major attack on their finance or its source, the government would have made bitcoin and other cryptocurrency usage a very difficult one, who know?