What’s an acceptable wagering requirement for you on Casino Bonuses?

[Pmalek]

I prefer sports betting bonuses over the typical casino bonus that requires excessive wagering on slot games. But since that wasn't the question, I will say that 25-30x is enough. It still gives the casinos a huge advantage and most bonus players will lose and return the money. If some casinos can live with that edge, most of them should. 50, 60, or more x is just ridiculously high. 

[Sirquackalot]

Well, there is casinos that offer 35 -40X but there is a catch, Like if you deposit 100$ to a casino and claim Bonus in most casinos its 100% so the balance will be 200$ ( 100 deposit and 100 from casino)

Now since you have $200 you have to wager it 35 times which is 200*35= 7000. BUTTT the point is the casinos have rules that sucks, Like you cant bet more than 10% of the balance, like the max bet is 10% of the total balance.

So here the 10% is $20, now lets do math 200*35=7000,  now 7000/20=350

to unlock the bonus of $100 you have to place 350 max bets ($20).

this seems very impossible at some point with they allowing you to play selected games only. while the house edge is increased in bonus mode from 1% to 3% per bet.

[IjawMan]

By the name itself, it’s already just a bonus, so it’s not really something mandatory, and every casino can set its own terms for that.

Since I’m not really into chasing bonuses, that’s why I don’t really know what should be considered acceptable based on what you guys think. But like I mentioned, whatever rules a casino has, that’s what’s acceptable for them. If we don’t like it, we’re always free to move to another casino.


I think this topic has to be move to gambling discussion board.

you are correct it is just a bonus but mind you for you to have earned it you may have done something to have it and any wagering requirements should not be an arduous one. On top of that the player do have a scanty chance of making it out with the bonus on profit.

Bonuses are not applicable to casino games only, I bet on football matches a lot with the sportsbook site I'm using and I receive bonus in some occasions.

The competitions between casinos gives players options to move to as many casino where you the player is satisfied with the bonus wagering requirements is not what you fancy.

[obuoma]

Casino may have their reasons for fixing the wagering requirements for their bonuses, I don't really use it to assess casinos begause there are more things that matter to me than the bonuses. However, I think that a wagering condition of 35x is not bad for bonuses  as this is feasible for the player and sustainable for the casino.

I don't think it is right for casinos to make their bonuses unachievable, some lucky players should be able to make good out of the bonuses as that is how they will remain loyal to the casino.

[Nathrixxx]

When it comes to wagering requirements, gamblers would have prefer not being asked any or place under any condition than to withdraw without any condition, but things can't be done in this way because the gambling casino are going to be in loss, their main purpose of giving condition to any offer they made is to encourage gamblers to engage their platform for gambling and have every reason to remain, as they also take advantage to make profit as the gambler continue using their platform, m own wagering condition is 35x.

[Strongkored]

I have tried on a platform before where their bonus only requires you to wager x25 but I forgot the name of the platform but I think they're gone now (not sure if that's the reason lol).

My guess is freebitco because I have tried to get through it several times but as far as I remember I always failed.

Just like what @Bitinity said, the standard is around x30-40 in most known gambling sites and I for me a x10-x15 wagering requirements is the acceptable one. Though I have this idea in my head, what if the gambling site based their wagering requirement on the amount of the bonus that the user get? For example, deposit bonus, if user deposits $5k and above, then his wagering requirement will reduce by 5 so around x25 and the higher the user deposit the lower it will wagering requirements it gets until around x15? which I think is sustainable for them. Do you think this could work?

25x sounds reasonable, but I don't recall any casinos implementing it other than those mentioned above. Even 30x is lower, but most go for 40x or higher, and I've seen casinos implement 60x.
It's ideal for the player, not the casino, so don't think casinos will lower it because they want to please players, they're in business to make a profit.

[panjul07]

Beside looking at specific number such as 25x, 30x, 40x, etc, I will also look into the detailed term of this wagering requirement.
Some casinos apply the wagering requirement to the bonus only while some casinos apply it to deposit + bonus which make it double.
For example:
Casino A offer bonus with 25x wager requirement but it is applied to deposit + bonus, mathematically the wager requirement is 50x
Casino B offer bonus with 40x wager requirement but it is applied to the bonus amount only which make it pure 40x.
In this example the casino B is more acceptable for me.

[Nahl]

When i have decide to make deposit and playing at the particular casinos usually i didn't chasing the bonus that because when i was trying to chasing the wagering requirements i have realize that it is almost impossible for me because most often i have failed to withdraw my bonus because before i finished the wagering i always be lost but if we talking about wagering requirements for deposit bonus currently most of casinos has their own policy but probably those casinos have 50x or even more which make the players having trouble to met the requirements or to unlock the bonus and i think this wagering requirements is very hard to finished too so, i was hoping some casinos have down these requirements to 20x or probably less because these number is more reasonable to achieved

[pawanjain]

I’m curious to hear where the community stands on wagering requirements.

Before everyone jumps in with “0x”,  yes, that’s obviously the ideal. But realistically, casinos need some edge to sustain bonuses and promotions.

So the real question is: what do you consider acceptable?

Personally, I see anything above 35x as a hard no-go.
Around 30x or lower feels reasonable to me, depending on other terms (game weighting, max bet rules, etc.).

Where do you draw the line?

I think 15x - 20x is the optimum wagering requirement and can fall in not too high, not too low range.
Often for me, anything that's above 20x feels like too much. It takes a lot of time wagering that much since I am not a frequent gambler.
I know there are people who abuse such promotions but having 20x will eliminate such abusers on a high level.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Those casino bonus are just are just market strategy to entice the players and get many new customers and the the wagering requirements is a barrier that prevents every one with the bonus from winning because if that is not done, everyone will win and that won't be good for the casino, so understand why they normally put those crazy requirement like 40 - x50 but IMO, x20 or 25 is okay. It's not everytime they give bonus to players, so anytime they give, they should at least let them (players) be allowed to enjoy it too at ease.

[Agbe]

When i have decide to make deposit and playing at the particular casinos usually i didn't chasing the bonus that because when i was trying to chasing the wagering requirements i have realize that it is almost impossible for me because most often i have failed to withdraw my bonus because before i finished the wagering i always be lost but if we talking about wagering requirements for deposit bonus currently most of casinos has their own policy but probably those casinos have 50x or even more which make the players having trouble to met the requirements or to unlock the bonus and i think this wagering requirements is very hard to finished too so, i was hoping some casinos have down these requirements to 20x or probably less because these number is more reasonable to achieved

Because of wagering requirements, many gamblers lost their funds in the casino, they could not withdraw their funds because of the requirement. I gambled in a casino early this year and I won good amount and I was trying to withdraw it but I was restricted because of the wagering requirement. So I have to continue gambling and that time, luck was with me so I lost and won back again and finally I withdrew part of the money. So as I said, Op should add gamblers' friendly wagering requirement in his casino and not following the crowd.

[NewCryptocasinos]

Op should add gamblers' friendly wagering requirement in his casino and not following the crowd.

Yes, that’s a good point—and it’s something we actively look at.

One of the reasons we have Kings Game as an Editor’s Pick at WagerX because of its lower wagering requirements ( x20 ). We believe that’s a key factor when evaluating casinos.

That’s also why I really appreciate the responses in this thread, it gives a clearer picture of what players actually consider fair and achievable.

[dimonstration]

No wagering requirements is what acceptable for me since other casino offer this feature. 

Realistically, x30 wagering requirements is the casino standards and I don’t have complaints about this of there’s no other rule that will make the bonus claim extra hard.

Those complicated wagering computations for the count depending the game you are playing is what I don’t like the most.

[avp2306]

No wagering requirements is what acceptable for me since other casino offer this feature. 

Realistically, x30 wagering requirements is the casino standards and I don’t have complaints about this of there’s no other rule that will make the bonus claim extra hard.

Those complicated wagering computations for the count depending the game you are playing is what I don’t like the most.

Many gamblers would provably love to see that no wagering requirements, since bonuses and other things would provably more appealing to grab. But in reality this is not possible, since their casino will provably subject for massive abuse.

x30 wagering requirement sounds fair. But x10 or even x5 is quiet decent for gamblers, if they can offer that  maybe their casino will be tagged as player friendly platform.

But we all know its hard for casino to do that, because casinos are business and they provably have some business interest to protect, they don't want their casino to get abused by their unwanted players.

[noorman0]

-snip-
Now since you have $200 you have to wager it 35 times which is 200*35= 7000. BUTTT the point is the casinos have rules that sucks, Like you cant bet more than 10% of the balance, like the max bet is 10% of the total balance.

The more rounds played, the greater the exposure to the house edge; that's the whole point of these betting limits. And for certain types of games, more rounds can result in some invalid bets, which also benefits the casino, as some of them have biased validation definitions.

[iv4n]

So the real question is: what do you consider acceptable?

Personally, I see anything above 35x as a hard no-go.
Around 30x or lower feels reasonable to me, depending on other terms (game weighting, max bet rules, etc.).

Where do you draw the line?

I think you already answered what most of us are thinking... x40 is popular among many casinos, but that is so hard to complete. It's not like they are "no-go", that depends on other rules... are all games included, and do all games contribute equally? But even if we can play in-house games, it's still tricky to finish wagering requirements.

x30 already sounds great, and if it's under, it's great for us players. But there are not many casinos that offer such great terms, and we mostly see it occasionally when there are some promotions... in some cases, the number of users that can claim it is limited. First come, first served...

[Zunabet Official]

I’m curious to hear where the community stands on wagering requirements.

Before everyone jumps in with “0x”,  yes, that’s obviously the ideal. But realistically, casinos need some edge to sustain bonuses and promotions.

So the real question is: what do you consider acceptable?

Personally, I see anything above 35x as a hard no-go.
Around 30x or lower feels reasonable to me, depending on other terms (game weighting, max bet rules, etc.).

Where do you draw the line?

**Replying to @NewCryptocasinos (OP):**

x20–x25 is the sweet spot imo
Fair for players, sustainable for the house.

But yeah… terms matter more than the number
Clean rules = more trust = more action.

If you’re looking for something that actually feels playable, check this out our casino

[Haunebu]

That differs widely depending on the bonus itself and whether it's a casino one or sports one. Personally, I feel casino side ones should have a higher requirement like around x20 to x30 while sports betting ones should have a lower requirement.

Something like x3 with odds of around 2 or higher would be fine. The bonuses offering big prizes should have higher requirements while the ones offering small prizes should have lower requirements.

[viljy]

Preferably no more than x20. Because higher wagering requirements are almost impossible to meet (for example, x50). Because then the bonus starts to resemble a gift subscription to a service, when the first month is free, and then the amounts of homeric amounts are automatically deducted. So you don't even want to use a bonus with difficult wagering conditions. Hopefully, the high level of competition in the gambling industry will promote more loyal wagering conditions for customers...

[Kelward]

Casinos would not allow themselves to lose that much to bonuses so they would definitely set up the wagering limit too high for anyone who is interested to go after it but on my own end, 20 to 25x seem feasible for me to try and anything above such does not interest me. Although casinos have their own wagering  requiirements which differs from one another but however I am of the opinion that they should also add up more activities to their platform that could attract more players rather than bonuses with wagering requirements which sometimes does not go down well with players.

Casinos are businesses which are profit oriented not a charity organization so when they are offering wagering requirements for gamblers they put their own interests first which clearly show that bonuses are only to attract gamblers. They wouldn't make the wagering requirements to be low to please the gamblers because they will be raising their own risks so the higher the requirements is the lesser risks for them. 20 to 25× seems feasible to me too but you can hardly get such a deal so if what the casino you're on is offering is not fine with you then you should just move on.