🎰 SolCasinos.io 🏆 Find The BEST CRYPTO CASINOS 🎁 Best Casino Bonuses ✨

[Rockson1]

In this platform most of the things we are seeing here are just ratings, bonuses and  “play now”  buttons,  without much transparency around how these ratings are even decided.  It is very hard to rely on those scores as a genuine casino review without detailed analysis and real user feedback for each casino.

You are left to decide on the choice to make, as someone that understands how shady and untrusted some casinos can be, you do not need to be so quick in selecting any casino in any casino listing site without advancing your research so that you will be convinced on what to do because your money will be involved, I mean you are going to deposit funds at the end when you finally decide whether to gamble with any of them, that is to say that you have to make sure that you are satisfied with your findings before you can gamble with any casino listed in any site, I think we should be direct in asking SolCasino.io question on things we need to know maybe they should make clarity to somethings.

[Joy- maker]

You just made a valid point. if @Solcasinos what to be noticed, or get more views they have to make the necessary arrangements for a signature campaign and a review campaign. Because, simply launching an ANN thread won't give them the visibility they want. In that case I would urge their representative to reley this to the owner of Solcasinos.io so that they can do the needful.

Which one is the valid point? Solcasinos is not a casino as it is an affiliate website, have you seen affiliate website promote their site through signature campaign in this forum before?
There was BTCgosu indeed, but it is a review website and the campaign also not running for long time because I believe it is not worth to spend money to advertise affiliate website since they earn money mostly from affiliate commission.
Review campaign? Have you ever seen a review site or an affiliate site hold a review campaign before?
The suggestion to have signature campaign and review campaign is reasonable if it is given to casinos, not to review site or affiliate site.

Affiliate websites can still run  a signature campaign on the forum if they want. As you already mentioned there was one who ran a signature campaign on the forum in the past, although the signature campaign didn't last long.

Solcasinos can still run a one month signature campaign if they have the funds, and I am pretty sure that users here on Bitcointalk will click on any new signatures worn by other users, to see the new brand that being promoted.

However, you are still right running a signature campaign by review site, affiliate websites like solcasinos is not very reasonable.

[Nrcewker]

Affiliate websites can still run  a signature campaign on the forum if they want.

You need to understand mate that signature campaigns are nothing but marketing or advertising campaigns. Yes, anyone can run them on this forum, but the real question is why would they run signature campaigns in the first place? We normally see casinos and exchanges doing these types of promotions because, if more people join through these campaigns, there is a high probability that they will deposit large amounts of money into the casino or exchange. In this way, the money spent on marketing or signature campaigns can be recovered, allowing the casino to remain profitable. However, in the case of affiliate sites like the OP’s, do you think they can recover the budget they would spend on these expensive marketing campaigns? It is hardly possible. That is why you see very few sites, other than exchanges and casinos, running signature campaigns on the forum.

[CroverNo01]

I agree with giftedman in this and I wanted to at first criticize them for their choice of picks but I also then remembered that, their choice of picks is subject to their standards which might not be in alignment with my own standards and so I can't totally want to rule out their decision and maybe people should use their picks to make references and if you must play in any site seen on their platform, then the choice of still scrutinizing the casino before usage is still open and if anyone might have had any encounters with the listed casinos, either good or bad, then they should also state it so other users can learn from it.

There standard should explained for users that may be having doubt why one casino is rated more than the other.
You can write to the solcasino on there website to let them know about your suggestion so they can implement it if your suggestion is meaningful to them. Listing different casinos on the website may have a reason not only to getting referrals but for other reasons we might not know yet.

I think they should and ought to have a representative here since they already have a very active Ann thread here  and that's why I always suggest running a review campaign to know and seek the opinions of users and why focusing on feedbacks, criticism should be focused more on as this will help them know where they're slagging and act in accordance.

[Donneski]

I agree with giftedman in this and I wanted to at first criticize them for their choice of picks but I also then remembered that, their choice of picks is subject to their standards which might not be in alignment with my own standards and so I can't totally want to rule out their decision and maybe people should use their picks to make references and if you must play in any site seen on their platform, then the choice of still scrutinizing the casino before usage is still open and if anyone might have had any encounters with the listed casinos, either good or bad, then they should also state it so other users can learn from it.

There standard should explained for users that may be having doubt why one casino is rated more than the other.
You can write to the solcasino on there website to let them know about your suggestion so they can implement it if your suggestion is meaningful to them. Listing different casinos on the website may have a reason not only to getting referrals but for other reasons we might not know yet.

I think they should and ought to have a representative here since they already have a very active Ann thread here  and that's why I always suggest running a review campaign to know and seek the opinions of users and why focusing on feedbacks, criticism should be focused more on as this will help them know where they're slagging and act in accordance.

I've initially said here that they really need to explain their standards better for their prospective customers. Since they've brought the review site to the forum, it means they want forum members to engage and the best way to show that they really value the community's feedback is to have an active rep who'll directly address the concerns and criticisms here. Until they clarify us on how the ratings are done, it'll remain a "trust but verify" platform for many.

[GiftedMAN]

I think they should and ought to have a representative here since they already have a very active Ann thread here  and that's why I always suggest running a review campaign to know and seek the opinions of users and why focusing on feedbacks, criticism should be focused more on as this will help them know where they're slagging and act in accordance.

For now we are yet to see a reply from them but let's hope that the more this thread gets busy they will have someone to come here to answer some questions and give some explanations to make us understand how they rated some of the listed casinos. I also think that a review would have been perfect to get the feedback of other users because from the users experience the importance things would have been discovered and some bugs also fixed it there be any but may be they have their reasons for not doing a review but until they have a better representative to come give responds to certain questions you can make your personal findings before anything.