I've been looking for that opportunity to ask this question, will Bitcoin not survive without the existence of these ATM machines? Because I don't even see a good reason why Bitcoin ATM machines need to exist. They are essential for Bitcoin ecosystem because they provide the bridge between traditional currency and digital Bitcoin, I accept this fact but is it a must for them to exists?
From people who have used crypto ATM before, they claimed that using crypto ATM usually charge higher fees due to how they operate and handle liquidity, this is a turn off for me, I've only seen Bitcoin ATM but truthfully I don't see any reasons why I should use them. Canada. Ranked the second with the most existing Bitcoin ATM and now that scams are happening, it's not looking good.
Of course Bitcoin will survive and you may not see the need to use Bitcoin ATMs, but others might, and I'm not talking about scammers. I mean people who earn legitimately. For instance, someone may be earning in fiat and might decide to be using a portion of what he earns to buy Bitcoin via a Bitcoin ATM. I know this can be done on exchange too, but what if the person is avoiding KYC and just wants to buy and hold Bitcoin on his personal wallet? A Bitcoin ATM gives this set of individuals the opportunity to do so. If the bill is passed into law and Bitcoin ATMs are banned, these persons will be forced to use other means to buy Bitcoin, like F2F trade, which is risky and dangerous.
For the record, I am not totally against the bill. I just feel that a ban is too harsh. It would be better if the government place a limitation on Bitcoin ATMs daily usage instead of banning it outrightly.