(useless retarded personal attacks removed)
So far, you have supported the removal of a spam filter, glorified spam as "being easy to validate", rejected the reality that ordinal spam pay half the price of monetary users, all while claiming "the fees are the best filter", and you have rejected any and all attempt at resisting spam.
You have no credibility, Greg.
But I'm curious Greg. What are the ways you find are acceptable to fight against spam? Since your coretard mind rejects every anti-spam ideas so far, what are your suggestions now?
