One who wins big after many try or one who plays big who's smarter

[adultcrypto]

Gambling is designed in such a way that the longer you player, the better you become. In other words, staying long im gambling is a sign that you are doing great in bankroll management which is a very important skill a player have to master. That being said, a smart gambler is the one who stay long enough to be able to get a big win.

Betting big amount at a time usually make gambling very damaging to the player especially when those bets are way above what the player can easily lose. This is why this idea of "go big or go home" does not sound smart to me. I like it when I place bet in a way that losing it does not affect me mentally or interfere with other of my activities that will require my total focus.

[terrific]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

If I am to judge, they're both smart.
But if it's about which one is favorable, I will choose someone who bets small and then hit it big once after long attempt.
Because that's what gambling is all about, chances do come and whoever gets to win could be smart in their own terms.
Although it's not fun losing big from time to time. So, someone who's trying with smaller amounts and consistent with it understands that losing will always come. And then, at some point that the big hit will also come but unknown when.

[alegotardo]

I was arguing on this topic earlier today with some friends and we discussing about a gambler who has been gambler for a while and a few win and also one big win over a long period of time but plays with less funds like uses small money to win big and  and one who plays with serious funds and always wins big ones in a while, the question here is who is smarter.
Some persons were of the opinion that the high staker is smarter for always staking high and that his returns when he wins will always be high and cover up if he doesn't win next time.
While others say the the low staker is smarter and would not probably feel the pain of losing if he eventually does and would make more profit if he eventually wins.
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

I believe the smartest person is the one who place bets more frequently and with smaller stakes.

The person who places high bet is certainly bolder, and may well be more confident, but I do not consider they intelligent to taking the risk of losing large money at single wager... after all, recover this loss will be far more difficult than it would be for someone who lost a small bet.

I just commented in another topic where we was discussing how complicated it has become to predict patterns in sports betting, how unpredictable things are, and how even the "favorites" lose even when they are in top form. Therefore, a bettor would have to be incredibly naive to believe that they can be absolutely certain of an outcome before placing a large bet... such a person is certainly not the smartest one in the room.

[Charcol]

A wise person cannot be considered based on the amount of bets. Generally, rich people bet more than poor people. Because as rich people have more funds, their decision to make a profit is also bigger. In fact, a wise person should be considered, who actually gambles considering his financial condition. Because a person who bets considering his financial condition is less mentally stressed. And participates in gambling for a long time. And a person who gives priority to addiction without considering his financial condition is bound to suffer losses. At some point, such a person hesitates to sell his assets. And in the end, he has nothing to bet on. That is why I will call him wise who bets considering his financial condition rather than the amount of bets.

[Julien_Olynpic]

The smarter player is the one who wins over the long term, regardless of the size of their bets. You can win and lose with any bet size, and there are no patterns. But personally, I'm interested in players who make a lot of small bets. For me, it's akin to a black swan strategy. As for large bets, you'll rarely lose, but each loss will be many times more painful than a win.

[Samlucky O]

the question here is who is smarter.
Some persons were of the opinion that the high staker is smarter for always staking high and that his returns when he wins will always be high and cover up if he doesn't win next time.

It is not always as it appears, staking high doesn't make a Gambler a smart in my opinion, a Gambler who is smart is the one who gamble responsibly and win regularly and knows financial management and take responsibility for his actions without being aggressive after loses. Don't also forget that a gambler who always stake high and win big once may never recover the loses he had in one day. Sometimes he may never win big, staking high doesn't guarantee that you must win big sometimes the day you bet low is the day you win. And some never even win at all.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Some persons were of the opinion that the high staker is smarter for always staking high and that his returns when he wins will always be high and cover up if he doesn't win next time.
While others say the the low staker is smarter and would not probably feel the pain of losing if he eventually does and would make more profit if he eventually wins.
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

Honestly the idea isnt accurate cause winning on gambling isnt about if the person is a low or high staker since the results often depend on the luck of the user or likewise strategy. There will come a time that someone very rare to play and win super mega jackpot game via low staking game. The case is different for a high staker and consistent player since he/she could definitely win it but the risk of losing is no different than an average player.

[CryptSafe]

I can say here that the one who wins is possibly the smart one because most people tend to think that the higher the bankroll the bigger the win but forget that gambling is all about luck and in most cases big roller's are not often lucky as they lose a lot. But I think the smarter players are likely the players who play according to their budget they could afford to lose so they don't get overwhelmed by incidence of game loss because they game for fun and overtime as they play the little wins they get when added together gets them something meaningful to cover to some certain percentage the amount they have spent while gambling.

[yhiaali3]

It is impossible to judge exactly who is the smartest because everyone has their own point of view that differs from others, and everyone has a different mindset in thinking, in risk-taking, etc., so it is not fair to judge who is the smartest.

But in general, it can be said that those who gamble with small amounts for long periods are the best and safest because they reduce the risk of losing large sums of money, and if they manage to win a large amount one day, they will compensate for all their losses. As for those who gamble with large amounts, they will be exposed to large losses.

[rachael9385]

It is obvious that the smarter person here is the one that plays with less amount of money and wins big overtime because he is securing himself unlike the other gambler that stakes high on every game, this isn't a smart move to make because In the long run it increases the chances of losing. Gambling outcomes are not certain so it's better to stake low than staking high consistently.

[ZeroVinsonN]

I was arguing on this topic earlier today with some friends and we discussing about a gambler who has been gambler for a while and a few win and also one big win over a long period of time but plays with less funds like uses small money to win big and  and one who plays with serious funds and always wins big ones in a while, the question here is who is smarter.
Some persons were of the opinion that the high staker is smarter for always staking high and that his returns when he wins will always be high and cover up if he doesn't win next time.
While others say the the low staker is smarter and would not probably feel the pain of losing if he eventually does and would make more profit if he eventually wins.
So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

The moment you start deciding for someone how they should gamble they start dumping all of their failures and losses on you, if someone says they prefer staking high then it's their business and their choice, I am not about to advise them against it as long as that's actually money they can afford to lose,some people have the money, those who don't have that much on discretionary can also gamble with their smaller stakes, there's no better gambling strategy here, only what people prefer.

[maydna]

Low staker is smarter as he doesn't bet high and only spends money he can afford and perhaps he doesn't care the wins or when he will wins. He just enjoy time to gamble and thinks that someday he will win.

The smarter here is those who can control their money in gambling and not just spends money without calculation. He know gambling do not guarantee to win so he control the money and know how much money he can bet.

[shawonngp]

Who bet with high stakes I never want to consider him as a smart bettor, because the bigger the stakes and the bigger the risk, big odds does not mean that his win possibility is more, but the chance of losing everything in one bet, there is no guarantee that he can always win with high stakes, because in gambling consistently win is impossible no matter how experienced the gambler is. I take small bets, so that even if I lose, I can afford it. It is very rare, but it is possible to win big from small bets, because I could not win big even after gambling for many months. Suddenly, I was able to win big in parlay betting, from just a few dollars, it was a big win of thousands of dollars. I think those who win big with small stakes are smart, and it's more favorable to me.

[Pandu Geddon]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

In gambling, in my opinion, those who profit are those who do not lose more than they can afford. This is not about who is smart, but betting according to a budget that matches your ability is the most appropriate choice. If a large budget allows you not to be financially affected, it can still be considered appropriate.

Do not force yourself to bet bigger. You have to calculate the risk you can bear. Gambling is not an investment, where, when you invest more, you will enjoy greater profits in the future.

[Free Market Capitalist]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

Neither. Or both. The player who can bet big does so because they have more money, while the other player has less money but is looking for high multipliers. In the end, both will lose money due to the house edge, but at least the player with less money will enjoy it more when they hit a big win.

[Die_empty]

It is impossible to judge exactly who is the smartest because everyone has their own point of view that differs from others, and everyone has a different mindset in thinking, in risk-taking, etc., so it is not fair to judge who is the smartest.

But in general, it can be said that those who gamble with small amounts for long periods are the best and safest because they reduce the risk of losing large sums of money, and if they manage to win a large amount one day, they will compensate for all their losses. As for those who gamble with large amounts, they will be exposed to large losses.

If you ask gamblers which one is better, they would give different responses. This is because some people have made more money betting with large amounts. While another will tell you how playing it safe with small amounts has been helpful. I know some big-time gamblers who have made so much money through high-risk. But the consequences are that they also lose big.

I am a low-risk taker and prefer to use small amounts over long periods. It has been the best approach since I recovered my small losses each time I am lucky to win.

[HustleZ]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

Their smartness depends on what their mindset is, if the gambler that bets small is betting small just because of fear then i dont think he is considered smart but if he does to limit himself to a fixed fund to avoid losing extra money then he may be considered smart. If a gambler bets big just because of his addiction and for dopamine he is not smart but if he gambled big but in a calculated way to get bug returns then he may be considered smart. I consider the person who doesn’t gamble smart. 

[iv4n]

So the question is who do you think is smarter and which is a more favorable way to bet.

Can you afford to bet big? The only smart thing in betting is to stake only amounts you can afford to lose. So smart bettor bet with money he can afford to lose, all others are calling for trouble.

Small or big stakes, low or big odds, it's up to you to try different strategies and find what suits you, what is comfortable for you...
Once you make a deposit, you should be free to try different things. Sometimes it's good to stake more if you believe in your prediction, and sometimes it's ok to try some higher odds... Before everything, check the market and act accordingly.

[xenomorfo]

Their smartness depends on what their mindset is, if the gambler that bets small is betting small just because of fear then i dont think he is considered smart but if he does to limit himself to a fixed fund to avoid losing extra money then he may be considered smart. If a gambler bets big just because of his addiction and for dopamine he is not smart but if he gambled big but in a calculated way to get bug returns then he may be considered smart. I consider the person who doesn?t gamble smart. 

why shouldn't a person who plays because it's a game and therefore decides to pass the time be considered intelligent?
I don't understand, do you think you're smart if you think you can make money through gambling? I think not
you are wrong and you risk losing a lot of money

[swogerino]

I don't think either one is smarter because they are both losing money in the long run as the one who plays with big money usually it does not end well and also for the people who have lost a lot of money and then comes and win big, this big win does not cover all the loses they have occured to him so far. So in this scenario I don't think either of these persons is very smart to say the minimum. The only smart one for me is the one who hits a multimillion dollar win and immediately quit forever after it.