I don't think that they're going to do this.
They're a provider and they paid for them and so if a user requests for that, there probably won't be other offers to you if most of the games come from the same provider you don't like.
But this is a good feature for those gamblers who feel that there's sort of energy that comes from the providers that they've lost money.
It might be a good attempt to suggest it to them though.
For sure they wont because this is where they do make money too. They might be having that self exclusion but it totally talks about on stopping on playing literally but blocking or not to see a specific provider then there's no such feature and they wont really be doing it. So the best approach? Just manually avoid them and if you do hate pragmatic then skip all the types of slots they do have and focus into other provider. Actually you would really be able to think up on this way. Imagine having that 3000 rolls and having no bonus? that would surely pissed you off and thinking about being non fair and thats something a normal reaction for us gamblers who do love slots. This is why i do keep on transferring on other slots whenever my first 30-50 rolls didnt give out something good win or my bankroll is that fastly declining then i do tend to make some switch up.
Yes, that's the choice that we can do.
To manually avoid them if we don't like these games.
We can ban ourselves for not playing those games that we don't like because if we demand to them like that, we won't even be heard by them.
We're not even enough to cover the volume or demand that they're having base on their stats.
