Bitcoin Forum
December 08, 2021, 10:53:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 [463] 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 ... 607 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] CommunityCoin (COMM) | Pure PoS | Original COMM MultiPools Coming Soon  (Read 523716 times)
LethalStriker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:24:16 PM
 #9241

Can we see 200+ price again?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1639004011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1639004011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1639004011
Reply with quote  #2

1639004011
Report to moderator
pabloangello
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:25:16 PM
 #9242

Can we see 200+ price again?

Yes we can.

GatorJMT
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:50:18 PM
 #9243

Can we see 200+ price again?

Yes we can.

No Talent Thief Dev + Unfair, Unequal, Undocumented Distribution = Cratering Coin Price

Last one out turn off the lights.   Wink
xlcus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1009


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:53:21 PM
 #9244

Can we see 200+ price again?

Yes we can.

The question seems the same: can we see 1000+ $ price again for BTC
pabloangello
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:56:21 PM
 #9245

Can we see 200+ price again?

Yes we can.

The question seems the same: can we see 1000+ $ price again for BTC

And answer is the same. But we need time Smiley
Gold bars soon.

djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1047


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 01:56:51 PM
 #9246

Can we see 200+ price again?

Yes we can.

No Talent Thief Dev + Unfair, Unequal, Undocumented Distribution = Cratering Coin Price

Last one out turn off the lights.  Wink
nobody care... this applies to quite a lot of successful coins (HVC, darkcoin etc... any premine, instamine coins... all the same). What worry me is rather the marketing strategy which looks like the one of spartancoin (which ended up with a massive sell wall at 1 sat   Roll Eyes may-be I should suggest them to move to PoS, I still have 10millions of those  Grin only put 100k to sell, never sold them  Grin)

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
pabloangello
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:57:14 PM
 #9247

Can we see 200+ price again?

Yes we can.

No Talent Thief Dev + Unfair, Unequal, Undocumented Distribution = Cratering Coin Price

Last one out turn off the lights.   Wink

Gator, we are at the two different sides of the scene, but I think we have same goal Wink

crazyxx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 89
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:58:21 PM
 #9248

Can we see 200+ price again?

i don't think so. Sad

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.  SuZKCem8KjiwgSV3UATKkSDJPSyJjFyBff
evi_stale
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 01:59:04 PM
 #9249

I really want this to succeed.
Not sure about the fairness of Sharecoin. There are already 1530 applicants.
We must admit that the Comm dev worked very hard to get even 500 people after a month. Now Sharecoin has collected within 24 hours 3 times as much people  Roll Eyes
People are already started questioning this on their thread.
By the way I just saw a nem rule on Sharecoin: That you won't receive any coin at all if you used cloned accounts. Now how would they know that? So is it 1 Bitcointalk account per household or what? This is only the beginning of being a messed up coin as well if you start changing rules after the game has started - Don't you agree GatorMj?
And don't get me wrong I'm not against Sharecoin. I'd love to be part of that as well, just saying that no distribution model can satisfy everyone.
There is no such thing as a fair or a scam coin. It's all about people and their behaviour.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1047


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 02:08:17 PM
 #9250

I really want this to succeed.
Not sure about the fairness of Sharecoin. There are already 1530 applicants.
We must admit that the Comm dev worked very hard to get even 500 people after a month. Now Sharecoin has collected within 24 hours 3 times as much people  Roll Eyes
2 reasons:
1/ Before comm coin, nobody cared about free coin (or not that much) so it was rather difficult to find enough users (reason why we moved to 500) aside from cheater as there are always plenty... still the case with sharecoin

2/ 3 or 4th giveaway coins and finally something which looks manageable for the dev
So it tooks 4 coins to find the proper solution to have giveaway which is rather transaparent and manageable.
(and it tooks some times to understand what was possible to do with bitcointalk rules)
Comm was mostly the first, so obviously mistake have been made, it would have been the same for any of these coins if they had been the first to do it.

People are already started questioning this on their thread.
By the way I just saw a nem rule on Sharecoin: That you won't receive any coin at all if you used cloned accounts. Now how would they know that?
I guess with the IP address (must be perfectly traceable, at least on the admin side)


djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 02:10:21 PM
 #9251

nobody care... this applies to quite a lot of successful coins (HVC, darkcoin etc... any premine, instamine coins... all the same). What worry me is rather the marketing strategy which looks like the one of spartancoin (which ended up with a massive sell wall at 1 sat   Roll Eyes may-be I should suggest them to move to PoS, I still have 10millions of those  Grin only put 100k to sell, never sold them  Grin)

Please explain in what way COMM strategy is similar to SPN? SPN is a doge clone with IPO and fixed 300K block reward and a crowd of excited newbies because they mined it a lot at low difficulty for weeks and now they feel whales.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1047


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 02:12:08 PM
 #9252

nobody care... this applies to quite a lot of successful coins (HVC, darkcoin etc... any premine, instamine coins... all the same). What worry me is rather the marketing strategy which looks like the one of spartancoin (which ended up with a massive sell wall at 1 sat   Roll Eyes may-be I should suggest them to move to PoS, I still have 10millions of those  Grin only put 100k to sell, never sold them  Grin)

Please explain in what way COMM strategy is similar to SPN?
at least the clap stuff (don't even remember how it is called)... that's nice but that doesn't bring any buyer

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
sammy007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 02:13:00 PM
 #9253

nobody care... this applies to quite a lot of successful coins (HVC, darkcoin etc... any premine, instamine coins... all the same). What worry me is rather the marketing strategy which looks like the one of spartancoin (which ended up with a massive sell wall at 1 sat   Roll Eyes may-be I should suggest them to move to PoS, I still have 10millions of those  Grin only put 100k to sell, never sold them  Grin)

Please explain in what way COMM strategy is similar to SPN?
at least the clap stuff (don't even remember how it is called)... that's nice but that doesn't bring any buyer

Clap is good, and I did it for SPN just to kill time. So if every coin has a twitter account they are similar marketing strategy? You are talking bullshit.
GatorJMT
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 02:14:18 PM
 #9254

I really want this to succeed.
Not sure about the fairness of Sharecoin. There are already 1530 applicants.
We must admit that the Comm dev worked very hard to get even 500 people after a month. Now Sharecoin has collected within 24 hours 3 times as much people  Roll Eyes
People are already started questioning this on their thread.
By the way I just saw a nem rule on Sharecoin: That you won't receive any coin at all if you used cloned accounts. Now how would they know that? So is it 1 Bitcointalk account per household or what? This is only the beginning of being a messed up coin as well if you start changing rules after the game has started - Don't you agree GatorMj?
And don't get me wrong I'm not against Sharecoin. I'd love to be part of that as well, just saying that no distribution model can satisfy everyone.
There is no such thing as a fair or a scam coin. It's all about people and their behaviour.

The "Dev" for CommunityCoin changed the rules constantly from an equal distribution to 1000 down to 500 down to a new number no one really knows and now saying it was no equal distribution and his team of 8 got 40 million shares.

The CommunityCoin Dev did not work very hard to get 500 people, in fact he ignored or blacklisted many many valid applications, claiming vague and arbitrary reasons for disqualification so that in the end he could accumulate millions of stolen member shares for himself to dump on exchanges.  And don't forget there were 8 Devs, how hard could the work be split 8 ways.  Cheesy

It should be a fairly straightforward task for the ShareCoin Dev to spot and weed out obvious sock puppet accounts making the distribution even fairer.  True, there will never be a a perfect distribution in these situations but ShareCoin Dev giving up the small pre-mine that was initially planned was a huge step in the right direction cementing the community trust that a coin like CommunityCoin has completely lost.
BTCMS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 02:15:06 PM
 #9255

Sad to see this coin slowly dying. I don't see any reason why it would go up again.
Let's hope Sharecoin has learned from COMMS mistakes.
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1115


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 02:16:42 PM
 #9256

I really want this to succeed.
Not sure about the fairness of Sharecoin. There are already 1530 applicants.
We must admit that the Comm dev worked very hard to get even 500 people after a month. Now Sharecoin has collected within 24 hours 3 times as much people  Roll Eyes
People are already started questioning this on their thread.
By the way I just saw a nem rule on Sharecoin: That you won't receive any coin at all if you used cloned accounts. Now how would they know that? So is it 1 Bitcointalk account per household or what? This is only the beginning of being a messed up coin as well if you start changing rules after the game has started - Don't you agree GatorMj?
And don't get me wrong I'm not against Sharecoin. I'd love to be part of that as well, just saying that no distribution model can satisfy everyone.
There is no such thing as a fair or a scam coin. It's all about people and their behaviour.

Correct.  It is about behaviour.

The Comm dev had a good idea and intention, I believe. The distribution did not go smoothly, and errors were made (not least in trusting too many people, I cannot get the details I would like to see, but I am letting it drop because there are better things to do), it was a novel idea.

Now Sharecoin is using the same idea, and has hopefully learnt from the errors of Comm.

If detractors are rude and dismissive, they are making a mistake in behaving that way, but I think they will learn in time. I recommend a polite and respectful approach: that has always served me well.. I have respect for all developers who try new ideas, and put work in. I will follow sharecoin with interest. The initial distribution will matter less in the long term than the real projects.

Comm is going through the growth process, and will continue development.
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1115


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 02:17:40 PM
 #9257

Sad to see this coin slowly dying. I don't see any reason why it would go up again.
Let's hope Sharecoin has learned from COMMS mistakes.


We will see. This is merely a cycle. I wish Sharecoin well.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1047


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 02:18:18 PM
 #9258

nobody care... this applies to quite a lot of successful coins (HVC, darkcoin etc... any premine, instamine coins... all the same). What worry me is rather the marketing strategy which looks like the one of spartancoin (which ended up with a massive sell wall at 1 sat   Roll Eyes may-be I should suggest them to move to PoS, I still have 10millions of those  Grin only put 100k to sell, never sold them  Grin)

Please explain in what way COMM strategy is similar to SPN?
at least the clap stuff (don't even remember how it is called)... that's nice but that doesn't bring any buyer

Clap is good, and I did it for SPN just to kill time. So if every coin has a twitter account they are similar marketing strategy? You are talking bullshit.
may-be, but you can't tell that helped SPN in the exchange

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Majormax
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1115


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 02:19:14 PM
 #9259

I really want this to succeed.
Not sure about the fairness of Sharecoin. There are already 1530 applicants.
We must admit that the Comm dev worked very hard to get even 500 people after a month. Now Sharecoin has collected within 24 hours 3 times as much people  Roll Eyes
People are already started questioning this on their thread.
By the way I just saw a nem rule on Sharecoin: That you won't receive any coin at all if you used cloned accounts. Now how would they know that? So is it 1 Bitcointalk account per household or what? This is only the beginning of being a messed up coin as well if you start changing rules after the game has started - Don't you agree GatorMj?
And don't get me wrong I'm not against Sharecoin. I'd love to be part of that as well, just saying that no distribution model can satisfy everyone.
There is no such thing as a fair or a scam coin. It's all about people and their behaviour.

The "Dev" for CommunityCoin changed the rules constantly from an equal distribution to 1000 down to 500 down to a new number no one really knows and now saying it was no equal distribution and his team of 8 got 40 million shares.

The CommunityCoin Dev did not work very hard to get 500 people, in fact he ignored or blacklisted many many valid applications, claiming vague and arbitrary reasons for disqualification so that in the end he could accumulate millions of stolen member shares for himself to dump on exchanges.  And don't forget there were 8 Devs, how hard could the work be split 8 ways.  Cheesy

It should be a fairly straightforward task for the ShareCoin Dev to spot and weed out obvious sock puppet accounts making the distribution even fairer.  True, there will never be a a perfect distribution in these situations but ShareCoin Dev giving up the small pre-mine that was initially planned was a huge step in the right direction cementing the community trust that a coin like CommunityCoin has completely lost.

Yes, Sharecoin is starting well, and good lessons have been learnt. That is the progress of the alt coin environment. I respect your opinion, don't entirely agree, but that doesn't matter in the long run. We have the same aims, just different approaches.
ascer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 122
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 02:20:54 PM
 #9260

A very lively community gradually become cold today.
Unfortunately, developers can explain?
Are you in the development of another virtual currency?

Pages: « 1 ... 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 [463] 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 ... 607 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!