Anonymous? VPN?
You left out the "or Tor"-part.
If a VPN provider gets handed a subpoena from the police they will definitely comply
A subpoena for
what? "Your exit node did X on date Y" doesn't tell the VPN provider anything. They don't keep logs, so they don't know who they're after.
How we handle government requests for user data
we must – and do – make it impossible for us to fulfill any data request.
there is simply no data to request, nor confiscate in the case of physical seizure of a server.
When governments do request data, we refer them to our policy and explain that we have no information to hand over.
Should a government somehow succeed in legally forcing us to spy on our users, we will cease operation of our service in the affected jurisdiction
I also do not believe their no logs marketing angle.
All it takes is
one piece of evidence of lying about this, and their business is over.
Yes, Tor is way more excellent than a VPN. But also very limited. Can't really do much on the clearnet over Tor. But even Tor has law enforcement crawling all over and strategically attacking Tor, especially by setting up relays at strategically useful positions.
Also, are you sure a VPN provider would refuse to accept monitoring and logging of suspicious IP's on behalf of law enforcement? I think just because a VPN provider is no-logs does not mean they will not cooperate with the police in monitoring and targeting voluntarily.
I also do not believe their no logs marketing angle.
All it takes is
one piece of evidence of lying about this, and their business is over.
No business is too big to fail. And they all have their skeletons in the closet...