Where can I see nodes that signal for BIP 110

[Karl_3000]

I was reading this update which I do not think will be true
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5583900.msg66758753#msg66758753

What I know is that only 2% of nodes have signaled for BIP110 but I saw that on a news few month ago. I want to be seeing the numbers and percentage of nodes that are signalling for BIP39. Which site can I use for it?

[ertil]

Some statistics: https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/bip110_signaling

Possible outcomes: https://forkalicious.supertestnet.org/

[Karl_3000]

Some statistics: https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/bip110_signaling

We are in the 12th signal period now, only 0.2% of nodes have signaled for BIP 110 and these people are busy spamming on this forum. It can easily be seen from the signal period and the percentage of nodes that signaled that they are losers.

[ABCbits]

Some statistics: https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/bip110_signaling

Possible outcomes: https://forkalicious.supertestnet.org/

Other relevant website: https://mainnet.observer/charts/mining-pools-mining-bip110/ and https://mainnet.observer/charts/blocks-bip110-signaling/.

Some statistics: https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/bip110_signaling

We are in the 12th signal period now, only 0.2% of nodes have signaled for BIP 110 and these people are busy spamming on this forum. It can easily be seen from the signal period and the percentage of nodes that signaled that they are losers.

Link you visited is about signal by total block mined. If you want to estimate total node that either signal or support BIP 110, visit https://bitref.com/nodes/ and count based on nodes that run Bitcoin Knots.

I recall only since 29.3 it signal BIP 110, but i could be wrong, so check it's changelog on https://github.com/bitcoinknots/bitcoin/releases.

[gmaxwell]

I see 3 peers indicating 110 in their subvers out of 122 (on nodes that don't auto-disconnect knots peers due to wasting bandwidth with needless redundant txn fetching).  Whats the deal there?  The BIP is, of course in a typical show of incompetence, utterly silent on any p2p visibility.  There used to be more.

[DaveF]

I see 3 peers indicating 110 in their subvers out of 122 (on nodes that don't auto-disconnect knots peers due to wasting bandwidth with needless redundant txn fetching).  Whats the deal there?  The BIP is, of course in a typical show of incompetence, utterly silent on any p2p visibility.  There used to be more.

Onion or public IP?

If they are what many of us suspect to be, just sybil attack with many of the nodes just being one node with multiple onion identities or just running a proxy back to one node if they are on real IPs it might be that once one 110 node has a certain node in it's ban / block list it's actually stopping what might be what looks like dozens or hundreds of IPs / onion addresses from talking back to that one blocked node.

-Dave

[gmaxwell]

public IP... interesting thought!