Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2026, 08:10:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin Whitepaper Added to Blockchain as Contiguous Block of Bytes in OP_RETURN  (Read 51 times)
P2PKH_dude (OP)
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile
May 26, 2026, 02:48:50 PM
Last edit: May 26, 2026, 03:28:16 PM by P2PKH_dude
Merited by ABCbits (1)
 #1

Hello everyone,

This is my first post here, so forgive me if this isn't in the right place.

I run a handful of Python scripts I wrote a couple of years ago from time to time to find unusually large outputs in single transactions. The most common thing that pops up is large OP_RETURN outputs, as people have recently been shoving more arbitrary data in these since Bitcoin Core raised the policy-imposed limit.

My script found this transaction, recently: 00000000000ad99639585eb5fb0dc0bb093575719ecd78cfede972637b65de07.

It contains the entire whitepaper in a single OP_RETURN output (vout=1).

The transaction itself is also funny, since the TXID has clearly been vanity-searched (there is a nonce in the last vout of the TX), the origin address has a small HASH160, and one of the output addresses starts with 1Bitcoin.... The SHA-256 hash of the PDF itself must also have been vanity-searched: 0000000000003c2287e2a94e93882e1f56fcbfa3c71c5b1c75edf11c6946e6cb.

Thought it could be interesting to highlight this.

Best regards,
P2PKH_dude
BTCBTCBTC
ABCbits
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3612
Merit: 10075



View Profile
Today at 08:26:53 AM
 #2

It's crazy someone actually pay 1.25 million satoshi ($958.24) to MARA slipstream for this TX, when someone else already did that long time ago with P2MS on https://mempool.space/tx/54e48e5f5c656b26c3bca14a8c95aa583d07ebe84dde3b7dd4a78f4e4186e713.

███████████████████████████
███████▄████████████▄██████
████████▄████████▄████████
███▀█████▀▄███▄▀█████▀███
█████▀█▀▄██▀▀▀██▄▀█▀█████
███████▄███████████▄███████
███████████████████████████
███████▀███████████▀███████
████▄██▄▀██▄▄▄██▀▄██▄████
████▄████▄▀███▀▄████▄████
██▄███▀▀█▀██████▀█▀███▄███
██▀█▀████████████████▀█▀███
███████████████████████████
.
.Duelbits PREDICT..
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
███████████▀▀░░░░▀▀██████
██████████░░▄████▄░░████
█████████░░████████░░████
█████████░░████████░░████
█████████▄▀██████▀▄████
████████▀▀░░░▀▀▀▀░░▄█████
██████▀░░░░██▄▄▄▄████████
████▀░░░░▄███████████████
█████▄▄█████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
.
.WHERE EVERYTHING IS A MARKET..
█████
██
██







██
██
██████
Will Bitcoin hit $200,000
before January 1st 2027?

    No @1.15         Yes @6.00    
█████
██
██







██
██
██████

  CHECK MORE > 
DaveF
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4214
Merit: 7315


✅ NO KYC


View Profile WWW
Today at 10:31:26 AM
Merited by vapourminer (1)
 #3

It's crazy someone actually pay 1.25 million satoshi ($958.24) to MARA slipstream for this TX, when someone else already did that long time ago with P2MS on https://mempool.space/tx/54e48e5f5c656b26c3bca14a8c95aa583d07ebe84dde3b7dd4a78f4e4186e713.

We don't know what it actually cost them.
All we know is the fee was 1.25 million satoshi.
Could just have been an employee of mara testing something or someone else who had an agreement with them.

Could also be someone sitting on dozens and dozens of 50BTC blocks they mined back in early 2010 and really don't give a crap. In which case yeas they did pay it but it's the equivalent amount of money to them  of me not making a U-turn to get a cheaper cup of coffee on the way to work.

-Dave


 
 b1exch.to 
  ETH      DAI   
  BTC      LTC   
  USDT     XMR    
.███████████▄▀▄▀
█████████▄█▄▀
███████████
███████▄█▀
█▀█
▄▄▀░░██▄▄
▄▀██▄▀█████▄
██▄▀░▄██████
███████░█████
█░████░█████████
█░█░█░████░█████
█░█░█░██░█████
▀▀▀▄█▄████▀▀▀
P2PKH_dude (OP)
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 1


View Profile
Today at 04:36:04 PM
 #4

It's crazy someone actually pay 1.25 million satoshi ($958.24) to MARA slipstream for this TX, when someone else already did that long time ago with P2MS on https://mempool.space/tx/54e48e5f5c656b26c3bca14a8c95aa583d07ebe84dde3b7dd4a78f4e4186e713.

Yeah, the whitepaper has been added to the blockchain before, but this is the first time - as far as I know - that it's been pushed as a single, contiguous block of bytes.

But I agree, 1.25M sats for this is crazy! I could have put that to much better use, hehe.

I pulled it from my node like this:

Code:
bitcoin-cli getrawtransaction 00000000000ad99639585eb5fb0dc0bb093575719ecd78cfede972637b65de07 true | jq -r '.vout[1].scriptPubKey.hex' | xxd -r -p | tail -c +7 > whitepaper.pdf

Vout=1. The scriptPubKey starts with 1 byte for the OP_RETURN, then OP_PUSHDATA4 (1 byte), then 4 bytes as the length, and the rest of the bytes are the whitepaper.

BTCBTCBTC
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!