Poverty is orchestrated by man.

[viljy]

I even know the name of the person who creates poverty. But there is no practical benefit from this knowledge. Society is designed in such a way that the poverty of the majority of society is inevitable. This pattern reproduces itself even if the elite is completely replaced, even if the political system and economy are completely replaced. It all comes back to the same thing - economic and social inequality.

[Jaweria parveen]

Not everyone's problem is the same, so some people are in trouble because of their poverty and some because of the government. Now, if someone has everything, if he does something foolish, he will ruin all his wealth, and the one who has nothing will become even poorer because of the government. Everyone lacks something for which he works hard but does not get it, just like the poor want to end their poverty but he is not able to do it. And the rich make arrangements to improve their reputation but sometimes he is not able to do it. Therefore, most people are not able to improve themselves because of their poverty and get stuck in it.

[Fragrance1122]

Poverty is not an accident but a systematic design by the government. To keep people under control. Government control minimum wage, inflation, taxation and education. All these can be used to orchestrate the poverty. If you think I am lying, look around you.

Banks charge the poor and give the wealthy leverage. Is that not one angle poverty is by design. The education system teaches you to be employees not entrepreneurs. Religion too has been used to control people.

Bitcoin came as a way to destabilize the system. Let's be honest with ourselves, can anyone point out in history where poverty is naturally occuring or by design?

You are 101 percent right. Usually the government run a country like a driver. They know better where to start from, where to stop and where to operate again. It all depends on a country's policy , the level of their people and their position globally and also the trending environment. The law and taxes are all for the ones who couldn't afford it, not for those who can afford it but are not welling to pay at all. The inflation is man made. The poor wants to bring revolution and a change but whenever they are able to bring revolution and they become rich , their standards and motives change and they too become a bit classy and hate poor. Poor people are not poor by choice , they are compelled to stuck in one place.

[The Cryptovator]

Poverty is not an accident but a systematic design by the government. To keep people under control. Government control minimum wage, inflation, taxation and education. All these can be used to orchestrate the poverty. If you think I am lying, look around you.

If all the citizens become rich and smart, then the government will have to struggle to control the country, and they can't do corruption. Do you know most of the poor people are suffering from corruption? Corruption has prevented poor people from becoming rich or achieving stability. The government thinks much more about corruption; they don't contemplate removing poverty from the country. They never have such real plans. Only they have paper plans.

Banks charge the poor and give the wealthy leverage. Is that not one angle poverty is by design. The education system teaches you to be employees not entrepreneurs. Religion too has been used to control people.

Bitcoin came as a way to destabilize the system. Let's be honest with ourselves, can anyone point out in history where poverty is naturally occuring or by design?

Poverty is inherent, but the system is designed in a way that makes it difficult to escape from it. The government thinks poor people should stay poor somehow, so these people always will be obliged. But rich people aren't often obliged to follow something that looks like corruption. Rich people are smart, and they know how society works and how they should act.

[CageMabok]

Poverty is not an accident but a systematic design by the government. To keep people under control. Government control minimum wage, inflation, taxation and education. All these can be used to orchestrate the poverty. If you think I am lying, look around you.

I've looked around my neighborhood personally, and most of the poverty is caused by laziness and by previous generations not leaving any assets to the next generation. As for the government, which generally manages the country and enforces existing legal policies, it doesn't intentionally impoverish its own citizens. I've seen some wealthy people who once struggled from poverty to become successful today, but I don't understand the perspective from which you're saying this.

Banks charge the poor and give the wealthy leverage. Is that not one angle poverty is by design. The education system teaches you to be employees not entrepreneurs. Religion too has been used to control people.

Actually, banks also charge the same fees to the rich, only the rich are sometimes able to manage the money taken from the bank to cover interest and also to pay off the loans they have taken from the bank. Meanwhile, the poor only have one choice, which is to work hard to become rich and not have to deal with the bank if the person still realizes that he is poor because the bank only sees the customer as the same without making any special distinctions in terms of loans and fees. But regarding school, I agree with what you said because I never found a lesson on being a boss when I was in school, but regarding the matter of religion being used to control people, I think you need to review it again because if that has happened, maybe the person who uses religion for that is not a good person.

[Egii Nna]

The government create and implement all the above mentioned policies to be able to control the people which they have achieved all over. Before the introduction of the government human at some point are lazy that give room for poverty, if someone has is satisfied with the life style he or she is living this can really lead to poverty. The difference between the rich and the poor is that the rich are willing to extend there boundaries for a more complex flow of income while the poor is ok with where the are then with time they bocome stocked.

Poverty is not caused by laziness, many people are hard working, but they are still poor. Some are poor due to destiny, while some are due to unfortunate circumstances that can’t be changed, so you saying people that are poor are lazy is not true.

I agree with you that those that are willing to extend their source of income become rich, yes, but not all the time, because those people tend to take bigger risks, which sometimes crash and break them.

So, wealth is not all about being hardworking, it is just about being smart, knowing when to act, and also not being greedy.

[Swordsoffreedom]

The government create and implement all the above mentioned policies to be able to control the people which they have achieved all over. Before the introduction of the government human at some point are lazy that give room for poverty, if someone has is satisfied with the life style he or she is living this can really lead to poverty. The difference between the rich and the poor is that the rich are willing to extend there boundaries for a more complex flow of income while the poor is ok with where the are then with time they bocome stocked.

Laziness is a cause of poverty, but it is only one of many causes. Poverty is a complex issue, and its causes can vary depending on the country, region, or family circumstances.

Saying laziness is the main cause of poverty oversimplifies the issue and looks down on the poor. Because, in reality, the vast majority of the hardest working people are often the poor. Because that is how they survive, because they have no saving, no asset, and hard work is the only way.

[Coyster]

Poor people are not poor by choice , they are compelled to stuck in one place.

Whoa, i don't believe that anybody is compelled to be stuck in a particular place, that is wrong. One of the benefits of capitalism, which is widely practised as an economic and political system, is that it gives everyone the opportunity to build something, to get rich. I understand that we know it to be a system of the rich getting richer; and the poor poorer, but it is also characterized by competition and innovation, and because of that, a lot of people are able to move from zero to 100, it is very possible.

[michellee]

The wealth is only for those who already rich but now, poor people could still try. Bitcoin may not solve the problem but Bitcoin gives the way to have an investments like rich people. They could buying regularly using small money and hodl it for a long term.

But poverty is the way from the government to control their citizen and like or not, they know who can be rich and who can't and if we look closely, the government controlling many things to prevents the citizen against them.

[laijsica]

Your words are logical in the context of some countries. Most governments do not intentionally want to keep their citizens poor. The development of a country depends on the availability of natural and mineral resources of that country. If the government and bureaucrats of the country are corrupt, then there is no development in that country and the country remains poor. Even due to various conspiracies internationally, a country does not progress.
Be confident in yourself and acquire skills and try to be financially independent because whatever the government's objective, if you have talent, it will be easy to reach the desired position.

[Son Of Blockchain (SOB)]

 From the onset, life has been very unfair to the poor class in the sense that they have to live and abide by the rules and regulations set by the richer class but most poor people are their own problems, why I said so is because life would always give opportunities to everyone and only the wise would seize a good opportunity when they see one.
 Some poor people instead of seizing good opportunities would misplace their priorities on the wrong things that would be quite difficult to get them out of poverty, in that case they've become their own problem and should blame themselves if they finally grow old remaining poor,  some people are unfortunate to be born poor but becoming rich lies in their hands and how well they can seize good opportunities.

[TheUltraElite]

A proper mindset to approach the world is important to stop these, bitcoin is not the answer to everything but the ideology is.

Be the rebel, learn about how religion works and you can quickly understand the lies - stop the indoctrination but be prepared to face the wrath of their hencemen.
Education is important but learning skills is also important to get a proper job. Eventually the employee learns how to develop a product to solve a problem and then they can start their own business.

Taxation is a necessary evil. Without it the government cannot develop the land, provide free healthcare or support or protection. It is something that even bitcoin cannot save you from yet.

[Razmirraz]

Much of poverty results from unequal social, political, and economic systems, where groups are prevented from accessing resources such as education and capital. In this regard, the effects of structural poverty often lead to criticism of state policies when they fail to achieve equitable wealth distribution. If you feel that the impact of poverty occurs due to the system and dynamics of government policies in limiting salaries for government employees, then you must have the courage to break out of this vicious circle to gain independence and freedom in determining your destiny.

The reason why it is difficult for government employees to become rich is because they rely on a fixed salary and do not have an unlimited income leverage system, this pattern is very different from entrepreneurs who have unlimited profit potential whose scale can increase several times if they are able to expand the market. If you want to escape poverty, you should not sell your time to continue being an employee, but must have a growth mentality and upgrade your skills to increase your selling value.

[WillyAp]

Society is designed in such a way that the poverty of the majority of society is inevitable.

That is not true. Education makes the difference. Early societies did address the issue, i.e. Greeks. 
True is that a % resists to commit to the necessary steps. Similar way it is handled in the way society treats overweight.
The difference is willpower, the only thing you need to attack overweight.

[Salahmu]

Poverty is not an accident but a systematic design by the government. To keep people under control. Government control minimum wage, inflation, taxation and education. All these can be used to orchestrate the poverty. If you think I am lying, look around you.

Banks charge the poor and give the wealthy leverage. Is that not one angle poverty is by design. The education system teaches you to be employees not entrepreneurs. Religion too has been used to control people.

Education didn't tell us if we are going to choose employment and leave being an entrepreneur because if it teaches so we wouldn't have been leaning business administration or entrepreneurial studies so actually so long as school has those courses under there curriculum is important and it was the entrepreneur that helps a lot of people so that the poverty plans of there government will not prevail on them as they wouldn't be aiming for an employment or seeing effects on the poor minimum wages the government has given them. I no that everybody cannot be into business at once but if everybody was to become a business person they wouldn't regard the minimum wage as anything.

[Dreadboost]

Poverty is not an accident but a systematic design by the government. To keep people under control. Government control minimum wage, inflation, taxation and education. All these can be used to orchestrate the poverty. If you think I am lying, look around you.

Poverty strategy may be a pattern that the government uses to keep those who are poor extremely poor, while those who are rich will remain rich. This means these strategies only keep people in a stagnant position. However, poor people should not blame the government for making them poor, they are poor either by birth or because they haven't had a good opportunity. Every poor person can become rich if they want to, as long as they want it. There are business skills that are capable of changing someone's life, but some people choose to remain poor while blaming the government for it.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Orwell showed how those in power keep the masses poor and distracted on purpose, because a struggling people are easier to control. Keep them just fed enough to work, too tired to question anything. Inflation, taxes, endless debt, it's all the boot stamping down to keep you in your place.

Bitcoin is one of the few real ways to step outside this absolute mess.

[ColdLava40]

Banks charge the poor and give the wealthy leverage. Is that not one angle poverty is by design. The education system teaches you to be employees not entrepreneurs. Religion too has been used to control people.

Bitcoin came as a way to destabilize the system. Let's be honest with ourselves, can anyone point out in history where poverty is naturally occuring or by design?

Definitely true, poverty was created by man and imposed by man on a fellow man.

The government plays a game that targets only the poor. They don't want the poor to get out of their current situation. So they make a system that's meant to keep it that way, while the rich keeps getting richer and the poor getting poorer.

Taxes affects the poor the most. The rich finds different ways to escape these tax. With Bitcoin though we might be able to live an equal standards. It gives a balanced system rather than that which was meant to affect only one people.

[Fortify]

Poverty is not an accident but a systematic design by the government. To keep people under control. Government control minimum wage, inflation, taxation and education. All these can be used to orchestrate the poverty. If you think I am lying, look around you.

Banks charge the poor and give the wealthy leverage. Is that not one angle poverty is by design. The education system teaches you to be employees not entrepreneurs. Religion too has been used to control people.

Bitcoin came as a way to destabilize the system. Let's be honest with ourselves, can anyone point out in history where poverty is naturally occuring or by design?

We should always be questioning, but lots of different economic models have been tried in the past and capitalism seems to be the best of the worst. The countries who are able to successfully tame and regulate it, which is an ever changing dynamic, seem to do the best for their citizens but there will always be elites who have amassed the most in any system. Bitcoin is not an economic model, it is simply a tool that is used as part of an economic model - it's a helpful and transparent method of money transfer. Just like the internet is not an economic model, it just helps to facilitate trade and communication. You seem to think that Bitcoin has solved poverty? It's not done anything of the kind, the richest people are actually amassing it right now and probably own far more than all the other average people who used to own it. Yet for them it's just another asset and buy owning it they are actually helping to stifle it.

[Yeesha]

Poverty is not an accident but a systematic design by the government. To keep people under control. Government control minimum wage, inflation, taxation and education. All these can be used to orchestrate the poverty. If you think I am lying, look around you.

Banks charge the poor and give the wealthy leverage. Is that not one angle poverty is by design. The education system teaches you to be employees not entrepreneurs. Religion too has been used to control people.

Bitcoin came as a way to destabilize the system. Let's be honest with ourselves, can anyone point out in history where poverty is naturally occuring or by design?

I think the government is purposely ignoring individual's needs because they want to be in control of everyone, because they're all thinking that if everyone in the economy is financially stable they might fail to follow the rules of the governments. But, the fact that those problems are not mainly caused by the government alone, but also by some of the people around us. The fact is that we cannot purpose chose to ignore our principles, but even without the government they are ways we could help one another. I think wickedness is part of nature of human, and it is only small number of people that has pure hearts, and are capable of fulfilling their promises, but honestly speaking they are difficult to find. A lots of mess are happening in our communities and tackling those issues is going to be extremely difficult. But I still believe that things could still come back to normal if the government is willing to do so.