The real inflation problem is in asset inflation.

[YOSHIE]

When individuals, households, and even the government talk about inflation, one of  the first thing that comes to mind is food and service prices.

Talking about inflation, I have surveyed several regions, yes, in 2026 the impact of inflation will be felt and currently many people say it will be felt very much.
We all know that gold has risen tremendously, perhaps now those with large economic incomes can buy it, property asset prices have soared, land assets that were once affordable to buy are now no longer available, what's more, the current economic conditions are pressing.

People now understand that inflation doesn't just happen to goods and services, as I said above, what's more, the current decline in the value of fiat currency is crazy, I don't imagine that in 2030 the world economic situation will be worse and inflation will run rampant, this will be a disaster for world society as a whole.

[batang_bitcoin]

Is there any benefit to that? Are wealth owners outside the inflationary policy? What is the point of being rich? Owning more wealth, not owning money. If you consider money as the criterion of being rich, then you can go to Iran or Vietnam. If you own $1k in your country, you are a millionaire in those countries.

That's why others who have worked hard in their countries are moving to a country where their money is superior. Those with wealth are not exempted with inflation but they know how to defeat it with how they are managing their assets and wealth. Instead of them being eaten by the inflation and getting frustrated by it. They're looking for ways to defeat it and retain the money that they've worked hard for. I would like to migrate in a country as well where my pension might make me live to the fullest without having to think that I'm actually poor to average.

[Cryptomultiplier]

When individuals, households, and even the government talk about inflation, one of  the first thing that comes to mind is food and service prices.

Talking about inflation, I have surveyed several regions, yes, in 2026 the impact of inflation will be felt and currently many people say it will be felt very much.
We all know that gold has risen tremendously, perhaps now those with large economic incomes can buy it, property asset prices have soared, land assets that were once affordable to buy are now no longer available, what's more, the current economic conditions are pressing.

People now understand that inflation doesn't just happen to goods and services, as I said above, what's more, the current decline in the value of fiat currency is crazy, I don't imagine that in 2030 the world economic situation will be worse and inflation will run rampant, this will be a disaster for world society as a whole.

That's there is no argument about how inflation of asset structurally reshapes the landscape of the socioeconomic class of any country.
It is bare open and anyone who understands economics well will see  how assets trend upwards in price to show how much inflation has eaten into a country's economy.

The more inflated fiat currency becomes, the higher the value of hard assets in price distribution overtime, making ownership more difficult than ever before.

[slapper]

We still have to say this is capitalism. However, as defined in any textbook there must be some relationship between labor and capital that produces a reward for productivity. You're talking about something different. Asset-ism, maybe. In places where the main source of wealth lies outside of work.

The stock price of a company trading at 40 times earnings. What is that reflecting what? Not productive output. Not innovation necessarily. It's reflecting excess liquidity that has nowhere else to go because rates were held down so long that money just... Piles into equities because there's no alternative. TINA, they called it. There Is No Alternative.

However, workers're not falling behind. They've been blocked from the main engine for building wealth during their lifetime. Behind means the same race. This isn't the same race.

[bhadz]

Assets value increasing or inflating is also a byproduct of what's happening in the economy. And if the cost of goods are also dealt with inflation, that turns out that the assets that drives the investing market will also have its own increase. IMHO, the real problem deals with how manipulative the big corporations are. If they are holding specific industries in the neck and they're the oligarchs of it, they can drive the prices up and also can result to the appreciation of their valuation and as well as the assets that they own. But, the consumers are the ones to suffer from it. They're playing it well like involving the global politics and as well as the Strait of Hormuz war to control the oil prices. And it's no doubt, whoever control oils, controls the world and that's the same with these corporations who are into this industry.

[programmer3666]

When individuals, households, and even the government talk about inflation, one of  the first thing that comes to mind is food and service prices.

Within, there's the real underlying issues; housing inflation, stock inflation, land inflation and education inflation.  The aforementioned matters because, asset owners become wealthier while workers fall behind.

Could be unintentional, but today's monetary policy may widen inequality by inflating assets at a higher proportion to wages, consequently transferring wealth to the ownership class!

A lot of people notice inflation when food, transport or electricity prices go up, but asset inflation is another big problem that often gets ignored. Take instance where a worker may get a salary increase from $1,000 to $1,500 which looks like progress. But at the same time, the price of land, houses and even quality education may have doubled. So despite earning more, that person is actually finding it harder to own a home or build long-term wealth. This is why people who already own assets tend to get richer, while those living only on salaries struggle to catch up.

[Bitcoin_people]

When individuals, households, and even the government talk about inflation, one of  the first thing that comes to mind is food and service prices.

Within, there's the real underlying issues; housing inflation, stock inflation, land inflation and education inflation.  The aforementioned matters because, asset owners become wealthier while workers fall behind.

Could be unintentional, but today's monetary policy may widen inequality by inflating assets at a higher proportion to wages, consequently transferring wealth to the ownership class!

When ordinary people think of inflation, they usually mean the increase in the price of food, fuel, rent or daily services. Moreover, the cost of land, shares, and even education is increasing rapidly, making it difficult for workers to meet all these needs. A worker's salary increases gradually. If he has assets, he can become rich if he sells them at a good price in the future. But those who have no assets, no matter how hard they work, they cannot move fast and their chances are very low because the salary of workers does not increase at all. If we can see that in most countries, due to inflation, the price of goods increases, so they have to work for low-paid jobs and have a lot of difficulty in purchasing them. However, in the current situation, only those who have money, those who have assets and those who do big business in the stock market can become rich. Currently, the price of assets increases faster than the salary of a wage earner, which makes it difficult for workers to become rich by earning money through their labor, but those who have enough assets can move forward.

[Darker45]

What's actually the issue?

If money is losing its purchasing power, everything becomes more expensive. It's not just food and other services that grow more expensive because the value of money weakens; it's everything else as well. That includes education cost, land, other real estate properties, and practically everything else that you buy with your money.

But that's not necessarily unintentional. Inflation rates are supposed to be within the control of central banks, although there might be instances it could go beyond their control as in the case of hyperinflation. But the systematic and continuous devaluation of money is intentional.

[khiholangkang]

But don’t forget the wealth being transferred are also inflated. Asset owners may seem to become wealthier by figures but the inflation that cause the asset price to inflate will also cause the money paid for that inflated asset to also not have any value too.
So the real question does selling your asset in an inflated economy make you actually wealthier. Many asset owners will hope they can sell their asset in more stable currencies and not an inflated one, an inflated economy is not a wealth creator.

This means that even though our assets have increased at a reasonable rate with inflation, we are not actually richer, we just keep getting the same value but with a different number in fiat in your country.
Simply put, in numbers it increases but in value it is the same if you look at it from that point of view, but it is much better because we can maintain the value of our money stored in an asset.
But inflation is not only from the declining value of money, but from the scarcity of assets that can be one of the reasons why someone can become rich.

[Joy_learns_crypto]

But don’t forget the wealth being transferred are also inflated. Asset owners may seem to become wealthier by figures but the inflation that cause the asset price to inflate will also cause the money paid for that inflated asset to also not have any value too.
So the real question does selling your asset in an inflated economy make you actually wealthier. Many asset owners will hope they can sell their asset in more stable currencies and not an inflated one, an inflated economy is not a wealth creator.

This means that even though our assets have increased at a reasonable rate with inflation, we are not actually richer, we just keep getting the same value but with a different number in fiat in your country.
Simply put, in numbers it increases but in value it is the same if you look at it from that point of view, but it is much better because we can maintain the value of our money stored in an asset.
But inflation is not only from the declining value of money, but from the scarcity of assets that can be one of the reasons why someone can become rich.

Yes what’s worse is that you may not be getting the same value with a higher inflated number from when it wasn’t inflated and less, you can even be getting lesser value from the inflated numbers.
Inflation makes 10 million have less value than 2 million that is not inflated.
Scarcity of asset is not an end result of an inflated economy, asset can be scare at any point of the economy so it’s not an advantage of inflation only.