I would like to highlight my post posted in the AI post search topic separately.
That's some new level of spamming; looked up their recent posts and they're all off topic and out of context - they copied from AI chat box and forgot where each posts belongs. When you don't think for yourself, such mistakes are bond to happen.
They shouldn't be getting paid for this..
AI Content DetectedTopT3nsI'll quote something that struck me as very true. I'd like TopT3ns to explain how these (the two messages I've seen so far) ended up in the same thread, but they're clearly off-topic and don't make any logical sense. Could someone explain how many tools these two messages went through before they were posted on the forum?
A gambler that blames the casino for his loses is yet to understand the realities about gambling that it is somebody's business and you cannot expect them to structure their business in a way that wouldn't be favorable to them. This is why it is a wrong mindset to put all your trust in making money from gambling because you have to be lucky to win and when you win it doesn't mean that the same strategy will make you to win when you gamble again. It is not the casino's fault that you lost it is the way casinos operate and to remain in business also when you win don't think that you have outsmarted the casino because a few gamblers have to win everytime to give losers hope to continue gambling.
The determination of long-term plans on a randomly distributed returns is an indication of an underlying failure with risk analysis. However, all the temporary profit anomalies tend to give illusions of superiority and the mechanisms of architecture are continuously striving to gain producer surplus. The knowledge about the rules, which are already established in the industry, helps not to get emotionally attached to the multiplied offers of riches, unless some productive labor is made and measured.
It is only gambler that lack the understanding that gambling is a game of luck and winning is entirely based on luck likewise losing. So any gambler that understands this won't blame a casino for there loss. Although this just common human nature, people always look for were to throw blame to when things aren't going the way they plan. Most gambler feels that they can beat a casino because they don't see gambling as a game of luck and sometimes they do feel that they are always bound to be lucky at all time . However,this is wrong gambling is luck based and it is not possible for a gambler to beat a casino.
To establish a sound economic base, there is need to separate the speculative ideas with the actual needs of the family. Putting national security at the forefront and continuing to make mature and independent judgment is a sign of maturity and independence. The buffer of controlling capitals cushions the market subjects against the possible financial destruction by unpredictable drastic changes that cannot be precisely determined and understood.
I also believe that making money from gambling is not a realistic goal for most people. In fact, while you are learning, you are much more likely to make mistakes, and your losses will probably outweigh your wins in the beginning. After that, it can take a very long time just to recover those losses. And while going through that process, you start to realize how complex gambling really is. Eventually many people lose interest in trying to make money this way because it is difficult, time consuming, and requires a huge amount of emotional energy.
Leggett Perception It can be costly to learn the intricacies of speculative market, which in most instance can lead to huge capital losses. Being conscious of the emotional cost is an important milestone to quitting the senseless process of seeking the losses. City officials who are withdrawn out of the ecosystem show a mature way of thinking that their priorities are peace of mind rather than the damaging illusion of quick time gain.
It seems that you are counting on no one reading anything and are spamming by posting all sorts of nonsense.
Just check the idea of the topic or the meaning of the discussion itself:
Why do gamblers blame casinos when they lose, but praise “luck” when they win? or
If you can't persevere losses, don't gamble🙃
So, I would like to ask the community their attitude to the fact that some posts, in this case the three posts I found in the TopT3ns user's post history, in my opinion, absolutely do not correspond to the topic of discussion in open topics. However, managers, checking the number of posts, may not pay attention to this and in the future pay for such posts.
For understanding, so as not to waste time: The TopT3ns user quotes any user in the middle of the thread (in this case, he quoted my post with a double quote, and subsequently my post was cut off), but his answer absolutely does not correspond to either the topic itself or the post or posts that he quoted. I had some kind of "eclipse" when reading it because I didn't understand at all what the user was writing about.
But when counting posts, the manager, seeing a lot of "buzzwords," will never notice the nonsense that is observed in the course of reading the thread itself.
There is clearly the use of several tools, humanizers, and paraphrasers, to the point where AI detectors could not detect that the post was generated. Nevertheless, the post completely loses its meaning, and naturally even the detectors are "stupefied" by what the author wants to convey.
Nevertheless, the TopT3ns user confidently holds his finger up, considering himself right.
Hi, I came to attempt to trace all the posts that you quoted personally, similar to how I do with the detect majority of users utilizing AI, and possibly a few of you here also do so.
And the results are as follows:
To shorten the topic, follow the link.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66814117#msg66814117
So would I be defending myself? Of course not. I know the regulations in this forums as well as I know how to utilize the detection devices in use. Thus, I will always be careful in posting here.
Cheers!
Naturally, I sent reports to the moderators as posts of zero significance and they were deleted.
The question is, is such a user worthy, or are all the others who respond completely off-topic and, more than once, worthy of the status and tag "spammer"? As igebotz says, a "new level" spammer 
?
more:Within the last season i have so much experience that gamblers might be thinking is a better option, although every gamblers has their different mindset when it comes to accumulation and prediction of games, so with the much experience within last season, i just want to ask this question to know the strategies that work for you mostly as a gambler. The accumulation of longer term games that will be playing gradually by gradually depending on the dates and times schedule on those matches and staking only on one day games, which of the options do you prefer and which option works for you mostly in last season?.
OK, so if I understand correctly, both of this scenarios is talking about parlay (multi bet) right?
Well,I think alot of gamblers hate to tie their money down in the name of betting on games that won't be played immediately but will sit there for days, weeks and even months before the game starts, I personally don't mind betting on this type of games but then, the amount of money I am going to be staking on the game will be very small, I will have to make sure it's an amount I can comfortly forget there.
But comparing the two, I will have to choose betting on games that are only one or two hours to starting, or maybe at most one day and some hours.
I choose this type of betting because it's always better to know the outcome of your bet on time so that you know what to do next if it's either a win or loss, this is better than having to wait a long time for games on one's betting ticket to start playing, only to end up losing the bet after waitings for such a long time..
The rate of capital turnover is one of the determinant of risk management of speculative investor. The combination of the long term nature of holding funds and the long run nature of future return result in keeping a pool of funds in active liquidity that might be valuable in exploiting new opportunities. Quick settlement has the advantage of reducing the psychological intervention process where the financial position is known immediately without squandering time.
