Solved. Severe mental retardation on Michael Saylor and Strategy

[philipma1957]

^ Just bold the letters you want to highlight instead of increasing size that much, because it becomes eyesore. Thank you.

I'm 3/4 blind, and I actually appreciate them huge letters there, so I thank FMC for enlarging some of that for me.  Much obliged, FMC.

I am not sure if you are fucking around or what but I am gonna leave it here.

I won't also deny it that there are  actually one of those mental retardating threads.

Yeah.......

Those many fullstops make you look like a shitposter, please don't do it because you are not. Thank you.

Well written. As for the op that thread is as okay as an other.

Including threads like your: "Bitcoin bubble burst"  title

[Lida93]

I have observed that there's always trends in the forum and individuals will either follow the trend or ignore it completely.

Another example are the world cup threads. I think I have seen more up to 5 of thems on the gambling discussion board.

What about the Iran and USA face off war and the Strait of Hormuz which has continued to making the global news. We get to find topics relating to this issue in the economics and PS board depending on where the OP chooses to post it, even a few where deposited in the Bitcoin Discussion board as I remembered. But that doesn't mean that these topics are gonna be around for ever but because they're a trending issue we would keep seeing them made and anyone who doesn't feel comfortable which a particular one of them could just ignore to avoid creating drama that could make users mistake it that he may be having a rancour with the OP, whereas he's not.

[nutildah]

The problem I see isn't with Saylor but with the entirety of the post in question being rehashed in different forms over the last 12 days. Since the topic doesn't exactly mirror any other, I'd guess it ordinarily wouldn't be deleted, unless we can prove it was AI or plagiarism. It is definitely worth putting the OP of that thread on ignore.

I'd say not only is that a low-value thread, but I could swear it was 'helped' by who-the-fuck-knows what kind of AI tool, but one that churns out sentences in English that very closely resemble the typical output of *usually* newbie shitposters.

This is a real thing BTW. People are literally using AI to reconstruct shitposts!

FFS, maybe I've been going about this entirely wrong. Some people will do anything to avoid having to write their own posts.

[Free Market Capitalist]

Ok I see the thread has been locked, finally.

For those who still don't get it.

1. A guy starts a thread saying: "Don't worry about last week's halving".

2. I create a thread here saying that a thread like that is completely retarded.

3. Then I get _act_ telling me that I don't like people writing about halvings. I also get philipma1957 telling me that the OP of that thread wrote something perfectly fine.

4. I keep trying to explain why basing a thread on something completely false—that a halving happened last week—is completely retarded.

5. The thread is finally locked.

I'm going to leave this thread open a little longer, in case anyone wants to add anything, and I'll lock it tomorrow at the latest.