🔓 Lock.com - Software isolation will replace the hardware wallet [PREVIEW]

[Ashawowo(OS)]

Hmm, That's correct. I also noticed this thing.
I again checked the last time madebylock came online around 8 days ago.
Hopefully, everything is alright, and maybe they are working on something.
And questions asked by members here should be answered ASAP to build trust in the community and for the longevity of the project.

I'm sure you shouldn't worry. The team members themselves are not always active on the forum, because they have enough time, and I think they left the manager as their representative, who forwards the letter directly to the Lock team when really important issues arise. And we should not forget that the manager leading this signature campaign does not undertake untested or short-term collaborations.

I think the Signature campaign is to establish themselves in the community before releasing the software, so that they are no more strangers when it is launched, it is a good step.

I still don't like that they've become very inactive recently, I might make an excuse for them that they're planning to answer every question when the project is already launched and being tested, so that people can confirm their claims as they reply and not just taking it with a pinch of salt. But It would've still helped to build confidence if they were still engaging to satisfy prospective clients curiosity.

BTW, when are we going to get the final version of this software so that it can be tested?

Signup for the waitlist, you'll be among the first to be notified when the project is ready

[MainIbem]

I think the Signature campaign is to establish themselves in the community before releasing the software, so that they are no more strangers when it is launched, it is a good step.

I still don't like that they've become very inactive recently, I might make an excuse for them that they're planning to answer every question when the project is already launched and being tested, so that people can confirm their claims as they reply and not just taking it with a pinch of salt. But It would've still helped to build confidence if they were still engaging to satisfy prospective clients curiosity.

It normal to be curious when representative of a platform is not active in the forum, it brings suspicions among some members but i don't think you're making excuses for them but giving your opinion and i have similar thought too cause since the project is not fully ready, maybe the team is working on something big that's keeping them inactive. I can't wait to be notified that the project is ready, i suspect that they're collecting feedbacks from different platforms about the project to help them offer better service when they fully launch, I'm just so curious about their quantum immunity claim but I'm patiently waiting for a full launch.

[Yamane_Keto]

I still don't like that they've become very inactive recently, I might make an excuse for them that they're planning to answer every question when the project is already launched and being tested, so that people can confirm their claims as they reply and not just taking it with a pinch of salt. But It would've still helped to build confidence if they were still engaging to satisfy prospective clients curiosity.

If there is no executable code, there is nothing to discuss. The team is giving a revolutionary idea, and without testing it, there is no discussion. Launching signature campaign will raise expectations, which is good.

[snowpega]

Signup for the waitlist, you'll be among the first to be notified when the project is ready

Mate, I have been on the waiting list for too long. If you follow the previous discussion, you will come to know about this...

If there is no executable code, there is nothing to discuss. The team is giving a revolutionary idea, and without testing it, there is no discussion. Launching signature campaign will raise expectations, which is good.

Yeah, this is too correct, and for this we need to wait for the team to announce the project's final version, maybe so that we can test it.
And the team must be working on it. So let's see when they come back here with the final version.

[oll]

Hmm, That's correct. I also noticed this thing.
I again checked the last time madebylock came online around 8 days ago.
Hopefully, everything is alright, and maybe they are working on something.
And questions asked by members here should be answered ASAP to build trust in the community and for the longevity of the project.

I'm sure you shouldn't worry. The team members themselves are not always active on the forum, because they have enough time, and I think they left the manager as their representative, who forwards the letter directly to the Lock team when really important issues arise. And we should not forget that the manager leading this signature campaign does not undertake untested or short-term collaborations.

I think the Signature campaign is to establish themselves in the community before releasing the software, so that they are no more strangers when it is launched, it is a good step.

I still don't like that they've become very inactive recently, I might make an excuse for them that they're planning to answer every question when the project is already launched and being tested, so that people can confirm their claims as they reply and not just taking it with a pinch of salt. But It would've still helped to build confidence if they were still engaging to satisfy prospective clients curiosity.

BTW, when are we going to get the final version of this software so that it can be tested?

Signup for the waitlist, you'll be among the first to be notified when the project is ready

It's possible that members of any project on the forum are so busy that they only visit when called upon by the campaign manager, who is the intermediary, to address issues raised by forum members. For example, the Stake campaign has been going on for a very long time, despite the fact that their intermediary hasn't been online in a while. In general, now is a very dangerous time for any crypto project because they need to constantly double-check their code. And it's even better to do this using the most powerful AI models, which, I believe, are excellent at detecting errors. In general, we live in a time when crypto projects will increasingly be checked for errors. The AI ​​war is affecting the crypto world on a massive scale. Therefore, it's best for the Lock team not to rush releases.

[ZAINmalik75]

I think the Signature campaign is to establish themselves in the community before releasing the software, so that they are no more strangers when it is launched, it is a good step.

I still don't like that they've become very inactive recently, I might make an excuse for them that they're planning to answer every question when the project is already launched and being tested, so that people can confirm their claims as they reply and not just taking it with a pinch of salt. But It would've still helped to build confidence if they were still engaging to satisfy prospective clients curiosity.

The purpose of the signature team is a lot bigger than the interaction or bringing people to the ANN, but still, they come and either they saw the signature or not, they at least try to visit the ANN before even interacting with the project directly, and it is a wise idea.

So ANN is like a double edged situation here, because imagine if you as a newbie come to visit an ANN which is full of questions, people raising concerns, and no one from the official side is answering those questions. Then what will be your first thought? You will say at least these signature wearing people are active and giving their opinions. Maybe they will give their answers and comments, but does that count as accountability and updates from the team? No.

Therefore, the team has to come and manage some time, but I would not force this all on them yet because the deadline for the final release of the product is about to come, so they must be busy fixing things for us.