Is few-word/one-liner responses spam?

[libert19]

As the title says.

[_act_]

No

It depends on how useful and meaningful the post is.

[Hazink]

That depends on the content of the response. There are a few lines comment that can be very detailed and pass down better information than some other wall of text, so not all is spam.

It depends on on which is what I voted for.

[DYING_S0UL]

It depends!  

I have seen LoyceV making few word/one liner responses many times, and none of them were spam, I felt he was always on point.

If you can give the solution in one word/sentence then that's enough, doesn't mean it's spam. On the other hand, a paragraph of sentences doesn't always mean that's helpful either.

[_act_]

If you can give give the solution in one word/sentence then that's enough, doesn't mean it's spam. On the other hand, a paragraph of sentences doesn't always mean that's helpful either.

There are times that my post will be of few words, but I just increase it without adding more meaning to it just because of signature campaign, but still a good post. I believe many people will be doing this also. It is not often, but there are times that it happens like that despite that I post more that required.

[libert19]

If you can give give the solution in one word/sentence then that's enough, doesn't mean it's spam. On the other hand, a paragraph of sentences doesn't always mean that's helpful either.

There are times that my post will be of few words, but I just increase it without adding more meaning to it just because of signature campaign, but still a good post.

Holy cow! I have never seen this kind of honesty before. +1 for you.

[LoyceV]

In this case: yes.

There are times that my post will be of few words, but I just increase it without adding more meaning to it just because of signature campaign

So you're saying your signature campaign manager encourages spam by setting a minimum post length. There's a better solution:

4. There is no minimum length to make a post constructive, but you can expect scrutiny. If you can post a constructive post in 12 words, you don't need to make it longer.

[Free Market Capitalist]

no

[MarryWithBTC]

Is few-word/one-liner responses spam?

I voted "It depends".

Posts like "thanks, I appreciate", "interesting topic", "pm me", etc could be regarded as spam depending on the context.

While,

Posts like "run a node instead", "do CPFP", "multiSig wallet is the solution", etc could be short, yet quality.

So you're saying your signature campaign manager encourages spam by setting a minimum post length. There's a better solution:

4. There is no minimum length to make a post constructive, but you can expect scrutiny. If you can post a constructive post in 12 words, you don't need to make it longer.

If I were a signature campaign manager, I would take enough time to recruit quality posters, when I get the right posters to hire, I will remove post length rule.

I understand that the post length rule was introduced because of spammers, I don't think that such rule is strictly applied to everyone.

[Ambatman]

I have seen few words that better explains a question than huge text
And have seen wall of text that barely explains anything.
But there are some that are obviously spam

Such posts as "SELL SELL SELL", "I agree", "+1", "Support", "Watching", "Interesting", "LOL", "SCAM", "LEGIT", "FAKE", other one word posts, posts consisting mostly of swearing, quote pyramids, useless introduction threads, threads about a topic already recently discussed in several other threads