~snip
I love the number 4 the most, number 4 exists because of number 5. Because people treat Bitcoin as just a digital investment tool, they encourage people to buy and hodl to make profit disregarding it as money, but this too isn't necessarily an attack on Bitcoin if I must say.
Well, I do have a little critics on some of your points especially the one saying centralized institutions came in to control the market. That's not completely true, individuals still hold large portions of Bitcoin
source. Without most of these centralized institutions, Bitcoin wouldn't be as widely used and accepted as it is today. There are so many users out there treating Bitcoin as a security asset, using it for features and spot trading, these CEXs make this happen and they're also creating order book that enable Bitcoin's price discovery. Without all these technologies, the wide spread success of Bitcoin won't be as it is today. So I don't see CEX's as something meant to kill Bitcoin but to create more utility to it.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating for CEXs, I'm just saying that it's not necessarily a bad thing. I love self-custody and decentralization, but that doesn't mean I'll turn a blind eye to the upside of it and say it is killing Bitcoin when it have actually done some good for it.
Of course the government sees that the masses trust and accept Bitcoin as a means of exchange even more than their local currencies; it's a no brainer to impose regulations on it before it outdoes their local currency and plunge the country's economy downward. This signals one thing and that is, Bitcoin is already successful enough that it even attracts the government's attention.