The more I learn about Bitcoin, the more respect I have for its creator.

[Joy- maker]

Many people believe that satoshi was a team working together because, if we take a look at Bitcoin it combines knowledge from several fields and it was developed to a high standard.  While others believe that satoshi is a single person that was technically skilled.

but imo satoshi is a single person who is highly technically skilled, and  If we go back to history Bitcoin was created during the global financial crisis when Banks collapsed and governments bailed them out.  Perhaps there were other expertise in different fields who worked with him to create Bitcoin, although I'm not sure just speculating like everyone else.

[SamReomo]

You can't blame them though, as no one can say they really know who Satoshi is, so they are just working on assumption to ensure they pull Satoshi out, even though they don't have the proof or evidence to show that its a team and not a single person and I like its idea of being invisible, as he might suspected that the future will need help and the only he can ensure his help last, he decides to vanished and designed Bitcoin to be out of anyone's control and that is what I find very interesting.

I won't blame them because everyone wants to gain attention in name of Satoshi and that's okay. Satoshi is either alive or he's given Bitcoin to the world and is now resting in peace, no one knows that. I must say that instead of focusing on who Satoshi was, we should focus on the innovation that we have which's Bitcoin, we can use it everyday as payment system or it's the safest asset where we can store our wealth by doing DCA. So in end Bitcoin matters not the one or a team who created it.

[Achalugo BTC]

I won't blame them because everyone wants to gain attention in name of Satoshi and that's okay. Satoshi is either alive or he's given Bitcoin to the world and is now resting in peace, no one knows that. I must say that instead of focusing on who Satoshi was, we should focus on the innovation that we have which's Bitcoin, we can use it everyday as payment system or it's the safest asset where we can store our wealth by doing DCA. So in end Bitcoin matters not the one or a team who created it.

I completely agreed with you, we'll probably never know what happen to Satoshi and honestly that doesn't change anything in Bitcoin, as he has lay a lifetime investment for us, that serve as a means to evade poverty in people's lives and that is what people should be thankful for, which people ought to focus on investing in Bitcoin through the method of DCA. We should make use of this gift, as its for our benefit both in this present and for the future.

[Catenaccio]

I completely agreed with you, we'll probably never know what happen to Satoshi and honestly that doesn't change anything in Bitcoin, as he has lay a lifetime investment for us

Bitcoin is only a good investment asset if this project can survive, develop without Satoshi Nakamoto, and it has been actually like this. It's a decentralized project from development to its network hashrate, blockchain storage and transaction confirmation and relay. Imagine that Ethereum without Vitalik Buterin, it will possibly cause a massive panic and other sever consequence.

Bitcoin fortunately has never faced with such challenge because since the start, it was programmed to be a decentralized project. The decentralization becomes stronger after Satoshi Nakamoto left the community and completely disappeared.

[GEMIN_M4]

You can't blame them though, as no one can say they really know who Satoshi is, so they are just working on assumption to ensure they pull Satoshi out, even though they don't have the proof or evidence to show that its a team and not a single person and I like its idea of being invisible, as he might suspected that the future will need help and the only he can ensure his help last, he decides to vanished and designed Bitcoin to be out of anyone's control and that is what I find very interesting.

I won't blame them because everyone wants to gain attention in name of Satoshi and that's okay. Satoshi is either alive or he's given Bitcoin to the world and is now resting in peace, no one knows that. I must say that instead of focusing on who Satoshi was, we should focus on the innovation that we have which's Bitcoin, we can use it everyday as payment system or it's the safest asset where we can store our wealth by doing DCA. So in end Bitcoin matters not the one or a team who created it.

Yea this it, people are much more interested in who Satoshi really is instead of focusing on what he created, it's a shame that developers haven't surpassed Bitcoin, I know that this isn't what many want to hear but why can't they learn from what Satoshi did?

Or everyone just prefer a project where they can control and keep tab on people? Because decentralised projects shouldn't be hard to build, but I guess they can't make that same sacrifice that Satoshi made.

[Achalugo BTC]

Bitcoin is only a good investment asset if this project can survive, develop without Satoshi Nakamoto, and it has been actually like this. It's a decentralized project from development to its network hashrate, blockchain storage and transaction confirmation and relay. Imagine that Ethereum without Vitalik Buterin, it will possibly cause a massive panic and other sever consequence.

Bitcoin fortunately has never faced with such challenge because since the start, it was programmed to be a decentralized project. The decentralization becomes stronger after Satoshi Nakamoto left the community and completely disappeared.

That is the point, Bitcoin has passed the test, that it can survive without its creator and why Satoshi left is for the good of the people who will someday know its value, that's why its a threat to the governments because they are not able to control the assets and this is an advantage to the people and why Ethereum can't really survive without its creator its because it was designed differently, though its also a decentralized like Bitcoin but the way Satoshi designed Bitcoin is not the same as Ethereum.