[LIST] Signature Campaign Ban List

[bangjoe]

This thread is intended to see a list of users who are signature banned by nutildah because if in the main topic it will be an unnecessary pile, I think here is much better to make it easier to see who is banned recently and notifications to each user, I put a link into his profile to easily see each user who is banned.

For appeals and QNA about this can be to the thread directly, Signature Ban Appeal and Q&A : appeal your sigban here

You can also see a list of banned users on Modlog or on BPIP for a list of all of them.

No	|	User Names	|	Rank Forum	|	Last Signature	|	Ban Expiration Date	|
1	|	virasog	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	January 16, 2027, 07:46:00 AM	|
2	|	Akbarkoe	|	Legendary	|	Stake Campaign	|	July 15, 2027, 07:33:04 AM	|
3	|	fuguebtc	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	January 16, 2027, 07:30:09 AM	|
4	|	topbitcoin	|	Hero Member	|	Kikabet Campagin	|	January 16, 2027, 07:31:02 AM	|
5	|	tygeade	|	Legendary	|	Bitz.io Campaign	|	January 16, 2027, 11:58:40 PM	|
6	|	FanEagle	|	Legendary	|	Bitz.io Campaign	|	January 16, 2027, 11:59:55 PM	|
7	|	Danica22	|	Full Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	January 17, 2027, 12:01:00 AM	|
8	|	Farhan99	|	Hero Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 16, 2027, 12:02:07 AM	|
9	|	bitgolden	|	Legendary	|	Stake Campaign	|	January 17, 2027, 12:02:58 AM	|
10	|	livingfree	|	Hero Member	|	Bitlist Campaign	|	July 16, 2027, 12:04:40 AM	|
11	|	Jody.Drummer	|	Hero Member	|	-	|	January 16, 2027, 07:32:34 AM	|
12	|	longyenthanh	|	Sr Member	|	Kikabet Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 01:36:07 AM	|
13	|	Yurkov	|	Sr Member	|	Kikabet Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 01:37:01 AM	|
14	|	cyberninja2	|	Full Member	|	Block.Race Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 01:37:34 AM	|
15	|	michellee	|	Hero Member	|	Degen.com Campaign	|	January 18, 2027, 01:39:37 AM	|
16	|	impulse709	|	Full Member	|	Bitz.io Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 01:40:41 AM	|
17	|	LordShanken	|	Sr Member	|	Kikabet Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 01:42:07 AM	|
18	|	whiteblue	|	Sr Member	|	Bitz.io Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 01:53:31 AM	|
19	|	Sithara007	|	Legendary	|	Stake Campaign	|	October 20, 2026, 01:50:57 AM	|
20	|	Fredomago	|	Legendary	|	Stake Campaign	|	January 18, 2027, 01:52:58 AM	|
21	|	junder	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 11:04:59 PM	|
22	|	redhack	|	Legendary	|	-	|	July 17, 2027, 11:06:27 PM	|
23	|	Wakate	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	January 18, 2027, 11:05:41 PM	|
24	|	Finestream	|	Hero Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	January 18, 2027, 11:07:24 PM	|
25	|	Fivestar4everMVP	|	Legendary	|	Stake Campaign	|	October 20, 2026, 11:08:13 PM	|
26	|	Bobrox	|	Sr Member	|	Vegabet Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 11:09:43 PM	|
27	|	juttsab@	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 11:12:01 PM	|
28	|	Zanab247	|	Sr Member	|	Bitz.io Campaign	|	July 17, 2027, 11:12:55 PM	|
29	|	Nadifa2030	|	Newbie	|	-	|	August 26, 2027, 05:42:10 PM	|
30	|	Minor Miner	|	Legendary	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 19, 2027, 03:49:11 AM	|
31	|	Adams0001	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 19, 2027, 03:51:00 AM	|
32	|	hyudien	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	October 22, 2026, 03:52:21 AM	|
33	|	passwordnow	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	October 22, 2026, 03:55:55 AM	|
34	|	JeffBrad12	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	October 22, 2026, 03:55:55 AM	|
35	|	alankasman	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 19, 2027, 03:59:02 AM	|
36	|		|		|		|		|

Note: Do not reply unnecessarily.

[Karl_3000]

I was thinking the signban users will be full of Stake users but Bitz users are there with other campaigns also. Nobody will complain anymore than a campaign manager is accepting spammers. No more drama like that anymore because such people signature can easily be banned now. Also a Bitlist and a user that did not wear a signature were also sigbanned. Spammers have categories.

[TryNinja]

You can also see a list of sig-banned users (from modlog) on https://bitlist.co/modlog?type=sig_ban

[MoparMiningLLC]

You can also see a list of sig-banned users (from modlog) on https://bitlist.co/modlog?type=sig_ban

is there a reason why OP has 20 on their list but the link you shared has only 17? is it just a timing issue between actual and when that site updates?

[TryNinja]

You can also see a list of sig-banned users (from modlog) on https://bitlist.co/modlog?type=sig_ban

is there a reason why OP has 20 on their list but the link you shared has only 17? is it just a timing issue between actual and when that site updates?

Nice catch. My scraper didn't catch the first ones. Fixed.

[nutildah]

I was kind of hoping somebody would take a look at where this guy's merits came from, its an interesting mix of characters (looks like somebody did yesterday):

Short but very important note: Why are so many people applying with less than 10 merits earned in last 120 days? We stated clearly in our opening post that this requirement must be met in order to qualify. Please do us all a favor and read threads before you are applying, this will help you in future.

It is possible that they apply, becuse they think that posts quality is more important..   Not many people care about Merits, because 10 Merits everyone can buy for a few cents on local forums ..

Why is this one of your more interesting posts? Because its outside of where you normally post, about a subject you almost never post about, and to top it off, you got 9 of your 21 merits for it. You got them from 4 different members: 2 accounts from 2013, 1 from 2014 and 1 from 2015. That is some serious OG respect right there.

Having said that, I'm gonna refrain from tagging accounts that get sig bans, just to separate forum functions.

[AakZaki]

Nice catch. My scraper didn't catch the first ones. Fixed.

It seems that the modlog in the bitlist is not UpToDate bro, recently I calculated the number of people affected by SigBan there are about 45 users, while the data in the modlog in the bitlist is about 30 users.
20 on the first page, 11 on the second page and there is 1 trial user.


Which I calculated based on the forum modlog:

Code:

+-----+--------------------+
| No. | User               |
+-----+--------------------+
| 1   | virasog            |
| 2   | Akbarkoe           |
| 3   | fuguebtc           |
| 4   | topbitcoin         |
| 5   | tygeade            |
| 6   | FanEagle           |
| 7   | Danica22           |
| 8   | Farhan99           |
| 9   | bitgolden          |
| 10  | livingfree         |
| 11  | Jody.Drummer       |
| 12  | longyenthanh       |
| 13  | Yurkov             |
| 14  | cybernija2         |
| 15  | michellee          |
| 16  | impulse709         |
| 17  | LordShanken        |
| 18  | whiteblue          |
| 19  | Sithara007         |
| 20  | Fredomago          |
| 21  | Zanab247           |
| 22  | Fivestar4everMVP   |
| 23  | juttsab@           |
| 24  | Ochan_yazo_tochant |
| 25  | BattleDog          |
| 26  | Wakate             |
| 27  | hamba laeh         |
| 28  | Mehedi72           |
| 29  | Volimack           |
| 30  | gurunanakji777     |
| 31  | creeps             |
| 32  | zaim7413           |
| 33  | asrinur            |
| 34  | Jose Mourinho      |
| 35  | adpinbr            |
| 36  | Bishop Victor      |
| 37  | KennyR             |
| 38  | Bobrox             |
| 39  | zarintasnim        |
| 40  | monetizator4       |
| 41  | Ivystar5           |
| 42  | VashaUdacha777     |
| 43  | Nadifa2030         |
| 44  | Finestream         |
| 45  | junder             |
+-----+--------------------+

[bangjoe]

Nice catch. My scraper didn't catch the first ones. Fixed.

It seems that the modlog in the bitlist is not UpToDate bro, recently I calculated the number of people affected by SigBan there are about 45 users, while the data in the modlog in the bitlist is about 30 users.
20 on the first page, 11 on the second page and there is 1 trial user.


Which I calculated based on the forum modlog:

Code:

+-----+--------------------+
| No. | User               |
+-----+--------------------+
| 1   | virasog            |
| 2   | Akbarkoe           |
| 3   | fuguebtc           |
| 4   | topbitcoin         |
| 5   | tygeade            |
| 6   | FanEagle           |
| 7   | Danica22           |
| 8   | Farhan99           |
| 9   | bitgolden          |
| 10  | livingfree         |
| 11  | Jody.Drummer       |
| 12  | longyenthanh       |
| 13  | Yurkov             |
| 14  | cybernija2         |
| 15  | michellee          |
| 16  | impulse709         |
| 17  | LordShanken        |
| 18  | whiteblue          |
| 19  | Sithara007         |
| 20  | Fredomago          |
| 21  | Zanab247           |
| 22  | Fivestar4everMVP   |
| 23  | juttsab@           |
| 24  | Ochan_yazo_tochant |
| 25  | BattleDog          |
| 26  | Wakate             |
| 27  | hamba laeh         |
| 28  | Mehedi72           |
| 29  | Volimack           |
| 30  | gurunanakji777     |
| 31  | creeps             |
| 32  | zaim7413           |
| 33  | asrinur            |
| 34  | Jose Mourinho      |
| 35  | adpinbr            |
| 36  | Bishop Victor      |
| 37  | KennyR             |
| 38  | Bobrox             |
| 39  | zarintasnim        |
| 40  | monetizator4       |
| 41  | Ivystar5           |
| 42  | VashaUdacha777     |
| 43  | Nadifa2030         |
| 44  | Finestream         |
| 45  | junder             |
+-----+--------------------+

I think the feature in this Bitlist process takes data from the first time nutildah performed a Sigban (on July 21) , so not the entire data from the previous one like the one in https://bpip.org/TempBans which even has 46 users who are in signature ban.

And when the modlog is updated [Sigban applied] he takes all his data without filtering whether it is a trial account or not.

[TryNinja]

It seems that the modlog in the bitlist is not UpToDate bro, recently I calculated the number of people affected by SigBan there are about 45 users, while the data in the modlog in the bitlist is about 30 users.

I think the feature in this Bitlist process takes data from the first time nutildah performed a Sigban (on July 21) , so not the entire data from the previous one like the one in https://bpip.org/TempBans which even has 46 users who are in signature ban.

And when the modlog is updated [Sigban applied] he takes all his data without filtering whether it is a trial account or not.

Yes, this is correct.

Before nutildah got his powers, the sig ban did not show on modlog, so of course they can't appear on bitlist.co/modlog

[Satofan44]

Excellent work, please keep it updated frequently! The appeals thread is already starting to become an annoying clusterfuck, and since this one is not self-moderated we have to be careful not to allow whining children to hijack it to discuss their individual cases.

I'm cross referencing my post from the other thread.

What I can suggest besides this is that in some thread a good tracking of all issued bans, ordered in some way, is provided because it will be very interesting to follow up on the accounts -- if we don't, I suspect many will just resume quietly the same spamming the same way that they always did.

The most important part of this is to observe:
1. How the accounts behave during their signature ban.
2. How they behave it once it is over.

In most cases we will probably see accounts being mostly dormant or continuing to shitpost during the ban or after the ban is over. All three activities are negative, continuing to shitpost in an attempt to pretend that they were not account farming and solely shitposting for money should be obvious for anyone who isn't blind enough like western liberal retards.

@nutildah what is the policy for getting a permanent signature ban? Have you considered how many violations or repetitions you would require for this? I expect the super majority will not improve significantly if at all.

[stompix]

We need a few more columns....
- average posts per day in the last year before the sig ban, average posts now (updated like in a month or so after the sig ban)
- merit earned now and then
There would be a few more funny columns like local board and so on, but that will trigger a lot of people, so, well, it is what it is!

[Brahmahatyaa]

Hi bangjoe I will help you update the Signature ban list.

No	|	User Names	|	Rank Forum	|	Last Signature	|	Ban Expiration Date	|
36	|	asus09	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:57:46 AM	|
37	|	bounceback	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:57:27 AM	|
38	|	martinex	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:56:56 AM	|
39	|	woez	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:56:37 AM	|
40	|	Teknisi88	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:56:18 AM	|
41	|	niall51	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:56:01 AM	|
42	|	PytagoraZ	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:55:43 AM	|
43	|	komisariatku	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:55:26 AM	|
44	|	NewRanger	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:54:55 AM	|
45	|	ahmia39	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:54:35 AM	|
46	|	kenelmark	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:53:48 AM	|
47	|	Kocret02	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:53:33 AM	|
48	|	rhodelmabanal	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:53:17 AM	|
49	|	BitTraderCute	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:52:52 AM	|
50	|	50 Cent	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:52:23 AM	|
51	|	BTC_Bear	|	VIP	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:51:57 AM	|
52	|	muratsink	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:51:37 AM	|
53	|	celot	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:51:20 AM	|
54	|	tazmantasik	|	Hero Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:50:57 AM	|
55	|	mrongoz_imut	|	Hero Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:50:42 AM	|
56	|	jamkesmas	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:50:01 AM	|
57	|	mrongoz22	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:49:42 AM	|
58	|	rmhuntley	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:49:20 AM	|
59	|	beami	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:49:03 AM	|
60	|	pliego	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:48:47 AM	|
61	|	aysha9853	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:48:24 AM	|
62	|	lornadane	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:46:30 AM	|
64	|	Antona	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:45:21 AM	|
65	|	devlin85	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:45:03 AM	|
66	|	gibrab16	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:44:43 AM	|
67	|	asrinur	|	Full Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:44:24 AM	|
68	|	Xxmodded	|	Sr Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 15, 2028, 06:44:02 AM	|
69	|	$weetne$$	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	January 22, 2027, 06:39:03 AM	|
70	|	Webetcoins	|	Hero Member	|	Stake Campaign	|	October 24, 2026, 06:37:37 AM	|
71	|	7788bitcoin	|	Legendary	|	Lucky.fun	|	October 24, 2026, 06:36:44 AM	|
72	|	Vaculin	|	Hero Member	|	Kikabet Campaign	|	January 22, 2027, 06:35:59 AM	|
73	|	CoinFoxs	|	Copper Member	|	Bitlist Campaign	|	July 21, 2027, 06:34:52 AM	|
74	|	|MINER|	|	Hero Member	|	Jackclub Campaign	|	July 21, 2027, 06:34:08 AM	|
75	|	ITExpert	|	Sr Member	|	Rollbit Campaign	|	July 21, 2027, 06:33:26 AM	|
76	|	Gallar	|	Hero Member	|	Rainbet Campaign	|	July 21, 2027, 06:32:40 AM	|

[SilverCryptoBullet]

Hi bangjoe I will help you update the Signature Campaign ban list.

Your list is not too accurate in information about campaign banned users joined.

I'm seeing some sketchy stuff going on. Most users in your update are not in the Rainbet signature campaign. They wore avatar and signature of Rainbet but not the campaign participants.

You can quickly check with Rainbet's Spreadsheet.

[Pandu Geddon]

Hi bangjoe I will help you update the Signature Campaign ban list.

Your list is not too accurate in information about campaign banned users joined.

We don't know the intentions of those accounts in using the signature and avatar from that project. But looking at the last activity of those accounts, they were definitely managed by the same person. They're no longer active, and I think that 2-year ban is appropriate.

[LoyceV]

Your list is not too accurate in information about campaign banned users joined.

OP should remove the word "Campaign" from the title

[Karl_3000]

OP should remove the word "Campaign" from the title

Yes, users' signature ban lists will be more appropriate.

Edit: Bitcointalk users' signature ban lists is another good subject title.

[Xiestar]

Your list is not too accurate in information about campaign banned users joined.

OP should remove the word "Campaign" from the title

Even on the updated list share by user above. Some of them is not truly a participant of Rainbet campaign rather they are just wearing signature code of Rainbet for shady reason.

[Karl_3000]

Even on the updated list share by user above. Some of them is not truly a participant of Rainbet campaign rather they are just wearing signature code of Rainbet for shady reason.

Why are you repeating what another user has posted already?

I'm seeing some sketchy stuff going on. Most users in your update are not in the Rainbet signature campaign. They wore avatar and signature of Rainbet but not the campaign participants.

You can quickly check with Rainbet's Spreadsheet.

@Xiestar, LoyceV has read it and posted that it will be good if campaign is removed form the subject title.