We've integrated Rubic, an aggregator inside the route table
We've added Rubic to the route table of our
cross-chain aggregator. Its quotes are pulled live on every comparison, alongside 30+ other exchanges, bridges and DEX aggregators.
An aggregator inside an aggregatorMost sources in our table are single venues: one exchange, one bridge, one pool. Rubic is different. It runs its own network of liquidity providers and returns the best route it finds among them.
Adding Rubic means the table now includes an aggregator doing, at its own scale, what the table itself does: searching across a set of liquidity providers and returning a route.
That's less redundant than it sounds. Rubic's provider set is not ours. Where its network reaches liquidity we don't query directly, its quote can win outright. Where it doesn't, it is another row competing with the venue we already call.
When the same liquidity shows up twiceThere is one detail worth explaining when you put an aggregator inside another aggregator.
On some pairs, Rubic routes through a provider that EIDEX already queries directly. A transfer of USDC from Ethereum to Arbitrum is one example: Rubic reaches that liquidity through Relay, while Relay quotes the same pool to us directly. Two rows, one pool, one price.
Rather than show both, the table keeps the direct quote as the main row and records Rubic on it as an "also-via" route.
Rubic is still quoted and included — it simply isn't displayed twice when the underlying liquidity is the same. Showing it twice would inflate the count and suggest a choice that doesn't actually exist.
Where Rubic's route is genuinely distinct, it gets a row of its own.
What it looks like on a live pairOn a
0.01 BTC to ETH swap, run at the time of writing, the table returned
14 live quotes. Rubic came back
fifth, 0.58% behind the leader.
Across the whole table, the difference between the best and worst route was
2.12% on the same swap at the same moment.
Don't treat fifth place as a fixed property. An hour earlier, the same pair returned 15 quotes in a different order because providers drop in and out and rates move underneath.
The ranking changes. That's exactly why the route table compares live quotes rather than relying on a permanent provider ranking.
Why the ranking is the wrong thing to watchA source earns its place by winning sometimes, not by winning always.
A provider that never reaches the top on any pair only makes the list longer. Rubic is different: it has surfaced in the upper half on every pair we have run it against.
The useful question is not whether one source stays permanently on top. It's how often the answer changes when another source is added.
On the live run above, choosing the worst quote instead of the best one meant a
2.12% difference, even though it was the same swap at the same moment.
Where Rubic fitsRubic is a cross-chain aggregator that routes swaps between chains through its own set of liquidity providers.
In the EIDEX route table, Rubic appears as its own row wherever its route is distinct, and as an "also-via" route on the winning row wherever it reaches liquidity already represented by a direct provider.
The point is not to make the table longer for its own sake. It's to add another independent route source and see whether it changes the actual answer: how much the user receives.
Open the route aggregatorAbout RubicRubic is a cross-chain swap aggregator that routes trades across multiple blockchains through an aggregated set of liquidity providers.
Full article: eidex.io/blog/eidex-integrates-rubicWebsite: eidex.io |
News: Telegram |
Chat: Telegram |
Support: @eidex_support |
X (Twitter)
We've integrated ChangeHero, now quoted live alongside 30+ providers
We've added ChangeHero to the route table of our
cross-chain aggregator. Its quotes are pulled live on every comparison, alongside 30+ other exchanges, bridges and DEX aggregators.
What a thirteenth quote is actually worthThe reason for comparing routes is easier to see as a measurement than as a claim. On a
0.5 BTC to ETH swap, run at the time of writing, the EIDEX table returned
13 live quotes.
The best route paid out
15.9374 ETH. The worst paid
15.5481 ETH. Same pair, same moment, a gap of roughly
2.5%.
That spread moves constantly because it is made up of things that move: each provider's inventory, its fee schedule, and the depth available behind the pair at that moment.
No provider wins every route. In this comparison, ChangeHero came back
second — ahead of eleven sources that had been in the table considerably longer.
Fixed rate, floating rate, and the gap between sending and settlingChangeHero has operated as a non-custodial instant exchange since 2018, supporting 100+ assets with customer support available around the clock.
It offers two types of rates: a
fixed rate, locked before you send, and a
floating rate, which settles according to the market when the transaction arrives.
That distinction matters most when confirmation takes time. The interval between broadcasting a transfer and having it credited is exactly the window in which the market can move.
A fixed rate turns that price risk into a known cost. A floating rate keeps the possibility of benefiting from a better market move.
Neither option is universally right. Having both available gives the user a choice depending on how much certainty they want before sending.
The number in the table is a live quoteEIDEX doesn't read a cached ChangeHero rate card.
We call the
ChangeHero API on each request, so the figure shown in the comparison is what ChangeHero would pay out at that moment, after its own fees.
That matters because exchange rates, liquidity and provider conditions can change continuously.
A quote that was second a few minutes ago can move down the table. Another provider can move up. The comparison is therefore about what is available now, not about maintaining a permanent ranking.
Why adding another source mattersA source doesn't need to win every pair to be useful.
The point of adding ChangeHero is to put another live liquidity source into the same comparison and see whether it changes the actual answer: how much the user receives.
On the live BTC to ETH run above, the difference between the best and worst route was roughly
2.5%. That is the practical reason for having more than one quote on the same screen.
A provider earns its place by sometimes changing that answer. One that never reaches the top only makes the list longer.
Where ChangeHero fitsChangeHero is a non-custodial instant crypto exchange operating since 2018. It supports 100+ cryptocurrencies and offers both fixed-rate and floating-rate swaps.
Inside the EIDEX route table, ChangeHero appears automatically wherever the requested pair is supported.
Its quote is pulled live and compared with the other available routes. There is nothing the user needs to enable.
What doesn't change: EIDEX compares the routes and shows the available options. We don't hold funds and don't execute the swap. The exchange itself happens with the provider you choose, under that provider's own terms.
Open the route aggregatorAbout ChangeHeroChangeHero is a non-custodial instant cryptocurrency exchange operating since 2018. It supports 100+ cryptocurrencies and offers both fixed and floating rate swaps, with customer support available 24/7.
Full article: eidex.io/blog/eidex-integrates-changeheroWebsite: eidex.io |
News: Telegram |
Chat: Telegram |
Support: @eidex_support |
X (Twitter)
