Bitcoin Forum
July 31, 2026, 11:45:45 PM *
News: COLDCARD users only: critical vulnerability risks funds stored on COLDCARD devices; immediate action required
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Can Bitcoin mining become more sustainable?  (Read 232 times)
hd49728
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1360



View Profile
Today at 03:52:32 AM
 #21

Of course it's not "the dirtiest industry in the world". The point is that it is still not an especially "clean" industry.
I agree and I know you are not a person who is anti-Bitcoin.

I believe you also know a famous saying "The truth lies somewhere in the middle" and it's true with Bitcoin energy consumption too. It's not the dirtiest industry, not the cleanest one but the point is it is better than many industries, nations that are used to attack Bitcoin mining industry.

Quote
IMO there IS FUD. But it would be much better to refute that FUD not only by even increasing the renewables percentage, but also by showing that Bitcoin is actually really useful.
There are still many opportunities for increasing percent of clean, renewable, sustainable energy resource in Bitcoin mining industry from technological innovations, applications to mining locations and operations. It takes time but the human civilization are going toward the future this way, and Bitcoin mining industry will not be the exception, while I believe it will be more or the most adaptive in this energy consumption shift.

Quote
But many Bitcoiners still propagate the narrative that Bitcoin is only good for speculation. And you can speculate with high risk/return also with things like penny stocks, gold and PoS altcoins. (I'm playing the Devil's advocate, but that is like many people think!)
That's stupid and people must beware of this stupid idea.

There is no convincing point for shifting from PoW (decentralized) to PoS (centralized). If they need an example to wake them up, it's Ethereum.

Alvin_talk
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 123

I don't want peace, I love problem always


View Profile
Today at 11:27:29 AM
 #22

I respectfully disagree. Still about 40% of mining relies on fossil fuels, and that's not even taking into account "flare mining".[1]  That can and should be better. Mining could be easily using 80-90% of renewables/nuclear, and solar energy since more than 5 years is the cheapest electricity source that exists.

You know, the whole aim here is to minimise the cost of electricity while maximising profit. From this point of view, I think geographical location plays a role in this rather just focusing 100% on renewable energy. If I am to go by this factor, then I will probably prefer flare mining for my location instead of renewable energy mining because it is literally free in my location, I discussed that in this Local thread post.

Yeah, I'm also aware that renewable energy makes the environment cleaner but this is still hypocrisy from the part of so many government, they claim to reduce carbon emission yet they subsidise oil and gas production, approve new drilling project and continue building infrastructure for fossil fuel. This kinda make me feel the government is just blabbing and nothing more.
BluebloodCXVI
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 102


Karma Is An Imaginary Cope For The Weak


View Profile
Today at 01:36:34 PM
 #23

It's more realistic to think that bitcoin mining is going to be less profitable ans less sustainable in future.
We have halving every few years (next one is in two years), and electricity prices are going up all the time.
Sure there are some cool projects for using excesses energy, but only small percentage of miners will do that.

Halving puts more pressure on miners, Yes!!
Does that mean mining as a whole becomes less sustainable, fuck No!

Mining has always been a competitive business, so as soon as the less efficient miners start to drop out, the difficulty adjust(downwards if enough miners leave). Giving the more efficient ones a better chance to stay profitable.

Also don’t forget that bitcoin wasn’t designed to rely on block rewards forever.
Transaction fees are expected to make up a bigger share of a miner’s income as the network continues to grow over time, alongside other factors like bitcoin’s value and more efficient mining operations.

I think it is very clear to us  by now  that Bitcoin doesn’t need every miner to stay in business for it to keep working.
Surely some companies will always drop out of business while others will adapt and replace them, just like any other competitive industry.

But as long as enough efficient miners still exist to keep securing the network, Bitcoin will keep doing exactly what it was designed to do.

Prioritize Self Custody,Don’t Trust Your Future To A Login Screen.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!