|
mmpool (OP)
|
 |
October 12, 2016, 09:27:29 PM |
|
Is mining the altcoins under bitcoin done at the same time as one mines bitcoin? Is that a miner side tweak in one's ASIC, or is that done at the pool interface? BTW, the wallet at http://devcoin.org/devcoin-wallet.html is a broken link right now. It's done at the same time from the pool side using merge mining. Currently though merge mining is disabled so only bitcoins are actually being mined due to technical issues that are being worked on. Namecoins are still be awarded through pool reserves so if you include a namecoin address on your account you'll get those. |
mmpool.org - BTC Pool - DGM - pays tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/ tor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paramind22
|
|
October 13, 2016, 09:54:46 PM |
|
At the time I signed up, I only had the BTC address. Now I have a Devcoin one and am compiling the Namecoin wallet to get one. But, when I'm at the registration screen if I just enter an altcoin address it says I need a BTC one. If I enter them both with user name it says that name exists. Is there a way to take on some altcoin addresses if you already are registered with only a BTC one?
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7723
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
October 13, 2016, 11:56:14 PM |
|
At the time I signed up, I only had the BTC address. Now I have a Devcoin one and am compiling the Namecoin wallet to get one. But, when I'm at the registration screen if I just enter an altcoin address it says I need a BTC one. If I enter them both with user name it says that name exists. Is there a way to take on some altcoin addresses if you already are registered with only a BTC one?
you need to pm mmpool as he can correct it. I ended up with philipma1957 philipma1957.1 philipma1957.2 etc before I had all merged addresses setup right |
|
|
|
|
mmpool (OP)
|
|
October 13, 2016, 11:56:46 PM |
|
At the time I signed up, I only had the BTC address. Now I have a Devcoin one and am compiling the Namecoin wallet to get one. But, when I'm at the registration screen if I just enter an altcoin address it says I need a BTC one. If I enter them both with user name it says that name exists. Is there a way to take on some altcoin addresses if you already are registered with only a BTC one?
Yes, if you email admin@mmpool.org or PM me here with the additional addresses and your account name I'll add them to your account. |
mmpool.org - BTC Pool - DGM - pays tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/ tor
|
|
|
Pizdation
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
October 16, 2016, 12:06:27 PM |
|
Yes, if you email admin@mmpool.org or PM me here with the additional addresses and your account name I'll add them to your account. Do You Need The Account Name or ID? How Do I Know When You Add The Additional Adress, Will You Respond? |
|
|
|
|
|
mmpool (OP)
|
|
October 25, 2016, 08:20:39 PM |
|
Pool is currently down. I'm working on bringing it back up now.
|
mmpool.org - BTC Pool - DGM - pays tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/ tor
|
|
|
|
mmpool (OP)
|
|
October 25, 2016, 09:05:36 PM |
|
Pool is operational again.
|
mmpool.org - BTC Pool - DGM - pays tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/ tor
|
|
|
|
mmpool (OP)
|
|
October 27, 2016, 08:51:44 PM |
|
500 Th rental underway for a few hours.
|
mmpool.org - BTC Pool - DGM - pays tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/ tor
|
|
|
wetsuit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 981
Merit: 1026
|
|
October 28, 2016, 09:23:01 AM |
|
This seems to be the only decent merge mining pool I have found. Is merge mining still disabled as mentioned in the 1st post?
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7723
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
October 28, 2016, 06:20:05 PM |
|
This seems to be the only decent merge mining pool I have found. Is merge mining still disabled as mentioned in the 1st post?
yep right now only btc and nmc |
|
|
|
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023
Mine at Jonny's Pool
|
|
October 28, 2016, 06:28:12 PM |
|
According to mmpool, there is no merge mining currently. NMC is paid out based upon pool reserves - not minting new NMC blocks. Unless that's been updated, and I missed the post... will let mmpool provide the corrections if I'm wrong  |
Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow! Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets! No SPV cheats. No empty blocks.
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7723
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
October 28, 2016, 06:36:40 PM |
|
According to mmpool, there is no merge mining currently. NMC is paid out based upon pool reserves - not minting new NMC blocks. Unless that's been updated, and I missed the post... will let mmpool provide the corrections if I'm wrong yeah that is more accurate as i read it I think your post is up to date not mine. although for the miner you still get nmc. |
|
|
|
|
mmpool (OP)
|
|
October 30, 2016, 09:06:15 AM |
|
According to mmpool, there is no merge mining currently. NMC is paid out based upon pool reserves - not minting new NMC blocks. Unless that's been updated, and I missed the post... will let mmpool provide the corrections if I'm wrong That is correct. |
mmpool.org - BTC Pool - DGM - pays tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/ tor
|
|
|
|
sloopy
|
|
November 06, 2016, 12:19:47 AM
Last edit: November 06, 2016, 06:52:09 AM by -ck |
|
MOD EDIT: Link to unrelated pool removed. Your link does not work for me and it is bad form to publicize another pool in mmpool's pool thread. PM the user if you think the merged uno mining is to their advantage. Open blatant attempts to lure user's away are bad PR moves. Look to Johny's behaviour as an example. He uses his sig to advertise and always attempts to help people with any issue. Not a post to get people to his pool, but helps with ANY issue if possible. Make posts with positive comments which are knowledgable. Show your pool NFO in your sig. If you are sincerely helping others they will look at what you are selling. Again, the UNO comment should have been a PM, IMHO. It was helping the user find something similar to what he wanted, but what he really wanted is UNO here on MMPool. UNO is a great coin and again IMHO any pool who is merge mining should be giving their users UNO. Seems like a simple decision to me, but I am not a pool operator with experience in setting up and merge mining UNO from the operator perspective. Maybe it is a huge PITA to merge mine. Either way I firmly believe IF the pool is already merge mining UNO is a coin which should be on the list. Good luck with your pool. 502 Bad Gateway nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu) |
Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
|
|
|
|
sloopy
|
|
November 06, 2016, 12:42:54 AM |
|
As I mentioned I will no longer being discussing the aforementioned topic outside of a PM just to be respectful of mmpool and this being their pool thread.
On another note, I used to throw a little hash at mmpool. At the time there was an almost constant rash of Denial attacks. It appears that things calmed down and the script kiddies have moved on to harass others.
Does anyone know if there was a resolution / agreement to make a payment or if the pool simply fought and never paid a dime?
It is a tough situation for a pool owner. If you pay them how do you know they won't ba back tomorrow wanting more coin?
If you do not pay them, how long do they play the cat and mouse games with your servers until they give up and move on?
I am especially interested in MMPool's situation and the outcome. However, I completely understand if there are reasons where MMPool leadership refuse to discuss these things.
IF possible I think it is or would be great to hear how it was handled in detail versus the posts about it in the thread.
|
Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
|
|
|
|
mmpool (OP)
|
|
November 06, 2016, 09:30:05 AM |
|
I am especially interested in MMPool's situation and the outcome. However, I completely understand if there are reasons where MMPool leadership refuse to discuss these things.
IF possible I think it is or would be great to hear how it was handled in detail versus the posts about it in the thread.
We ignored the requests to pay. We changed hosts and restructured so our public interface is an easily changed proxy hiding the actual host we are using to protect them from the effects of the ddos. I'm sure there will be future DDoS attempts but our policy is not to pay. Regular users can get their own IP address to mine on and the tor onion service is an option as a backup. |
mmpool.org - BTC Pool - DGM - pays tx fees/vardiff/merge mining/ tor
|
|
|
|
paramind22
|
|
November 19, 2016, 02:42:06 AM |
|
Hi, been mining to the pool on and off and had over the payout of .005 for DGM Estimated Round Payout, but I noticed it went down to .00499. Can it go back up by itself without me mining or will it just keep doing down?
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 7723
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
November 19, 2016, 04:49:59 AM |
|
Hi, been mining to the pool on and off and had over the payout of .005 for DGM Estimated Round Payout, but I noticed it went down to .00499. Can it go back up by itself without me mining or will it just keep doing down?
It will shrink but with the low hash rate it shrinks slowly. Or you can mine a bit and it will climb back up. |
|
|
|
|
paramind22
|
|
December 11, 2016, 05:19:15 PM |
|
Would be nice to get some Kano pool support here since they are doing so awesomely, and eligius support since they are doing so poorly. Maybe a holiday present for mmpool |
|
|
|
|
|
|
