Ai double standard

[BIT-BENDER]

I don't know if this description is even enough maybe I should added Ai stereotype, Ai false narrative and bad agenda I don't still think the description is enough because it is very weird to me.

I will let you interpret this yourself, if you could goole the sentence A boy is touching me  and then Google the sentence a girl is touching me. Read both Ai overview of the two sentences and you will observe the high contrast between the two sentences which is weird.

In the first sentence A boy is touching me the Ai overview was about it's bad, seek protection, you are being taken advantage of and just pure red alert but in the second sentence A girl is touching me the Ai overview was more relax, took it lightly and even suggested ways to continue the events.

I think that is not very intelligent since Ai is artificial intelligence, the difference between but overview is worrisome and completely wrong you need to stand on a ground for both sexes.

[caroasi]

What do you think the context is supposed to be for that? Is touch supposed to be about a specific topic to you by default? The single most common actual event of a boy being touched is probably in context of their mother changing their diaper, holding their hand, etc. So statistically, I guess that would be the most likely event. But almost everyone expects that, so they wouldn't necessarily do a web search about something so commonly known already. There are people who say a mother should actually not touch a child without permission, however one study that did that studies nobody touching a child (with or without permission), the child died with that being considered a primary cause, and now that kind of study is considered highly unethical.

[Karl_3000]

If a girl is touching me, I will tell her to continue 
If I touch her and she is responding positively, wow 

Jokes apart

It is good to be very careful of infection.

I did not see what AI gave wrong, the AI that I used says the right thing.



But it is better if you explain better, like you are a child and an adult is touching you. That is when you will see more accurate answers.

[SPIDERMAN008]

AI has the ability to update itself. And AI keeps storing new data regularly. Since online, including social media, men and women are presented in such a way that women are harassed by men. Such news is seen more. And since people talk about this issue more online as well as offline. So considering that aspect, AI keeps developing itself in the way that people think about themselves and the way society deals with any problem. That is why maybe AI thinks the boy's touch is harmful. But when a girl does the same thing, it does not see it as harmful. It responds in a friendly manner.

[Curious T]

I get the stereotypes and how society treats both cases differently, but you can't blame the AI or the people who programmed it. I haven't tested your theory, so I would take you at your word. You can't blame the AI or its programmers because statistically, only about 5-20 percent of all sexual offenders are women. This figure takes into account those who were not reported or convicted, because we can all agree that a good number of these crimes are not reported. If we look at the convicted ones alone, then that number will be about 2 percent. So it's normal for the AI to treat the same situation differently.

Women are more oppressed than men, and women tend to be more sexually abused than men. If an anonymous person writes on a platform that "I was raped", most people will immediately think she's a woman. This doesn't mean men don't get raped, but most of the time, a woman is the victim. And even the men are more threats to fellow young boys than women are. A lot of young boys that were sexually abused were abused by men.

[gracreavix]

This is not AI's fault. It is just influenced by humans. This is how basically we humans see both genders. We can pretend all we want, but that is how we view the genders. That needs to change cause it is not nice at all. It's even worrisome, where one gender is seen as the dangerous one, but the other gender as an angel. Instead of treating both as human beings, cause that is what we are. It's not Al's fault at all. Humans put the data in there and that's how it is seeing it now. Nobody is an angel or the devil. Classify all as human beings. Both genders do things that are good and bad. This stereotype is what is making some boys not to speak up when they are being molested by thr opposite gender. I am even furious now that I want to digress a little bit. Check the news and all initiatives is always going for the girl child. So you mean to tell me there are no younger boys again. Just imagine. The world we leave in. Everything needs to be balanced. That's all I am saying. Just balance all.

[dotpizza]

AI was trained on data from across the internet, as well as on feedback from people who interacted with the AI itself. There’s nothing hidden or strange about that. If a certain statement is “generally accepted in society,” then for the AI that statement is treated as true. AI does not think - it generates outputs based on its training and the data available to it.

[Doll2233]

The concern about consistency is quite valid. Artificial intelligence systems should never automatically assume that one gender is harmless and other one is Victim, based on a small sentence. The meaning of a girl is touching me and a boy is touching me, depends on the context, consent, age, relationship and the situation.

Instead of giving completely different interpretations, a better AI approach is to give a safe response regardless of the gender. Most of the time AI systems produces different type of responses to these type of questions just trying to recall the pattern that are associated with any sort of potential harassment or abuse but yes this type of patterns can lead to these type of unfair stereotypes in the context is missing the main goal is equals standard not identical assumptions.