@OP: this isn't a democracy, it doesn't matter whether or not we agree.
...
Did you suddenly lose the urge to post on the Gambling boards?
It is just a poll. I have a point behind using it and it is not intended to make any pressure on admins of course. I removed the part that I already answered before and I didn't want to see it from a serious member. The last part of the quote was partly answered in other topics. It is related to the dedicated time I have and how to distribute it. Reading posts here alone and replying to it costs me half of it.
-snip-
I recall many posts of theymos in particular because I consider him as a serious and let's say clean person trying to improve the forum. Thus doesn't mean that I agree with all of his ideas and actions. Sometimes a try period in some sections for anything new could reduce the damage done when applied globally.
Now I understand why you had to write almost 11K posts to earn 161 merits.
...
So I made all the 10803 posts after the merit system was invented? By the way I was in the same signature campaign as you so show some respect @Little Mouse. I refrain from dealing further with such superficial way of thinking. You are trying to increase your post in a silly manner.
By the way, I have here 3 998 days from registration, you can make your calculation (you can use AI to avoid mistakes from what I see here).
As a forum user, spam is not in my interest and I think (most of) the Sigbans they received make the forum a better place.
Can I suggest that you (forums) make a new list about members that should never (or temporarily not) join signature campaigns and force all managers to check it before accepting these members? + check it periodically to kick those mentioned there? That would get ride easily from the non cooperative managers and his followers. Restricting the usage of avatar and signature is not relevant for single users.
I don't mind topping that list (like that I avoid seeing people posting random thing about me because of this idea).
Ban on this forum regardless of the status on the ban should not be a child's Play or for testing sake, that is why the law is there and anyone that goes against it face the consequence, be it a moderator, merit source, campaign manager or any other forum member, no one is above the law and once you see a ban is being placed on a user, then know that every reason to why this is being issued is valid.
It is what you have in mind and in abundance that you speak out; you only throw your opinion or idea, and this does not mean it is 100% acceptable, so don't be scared when people rake all manner of attack on you over this.
There is an immunity for some users here. That's undeniable until they make a mistake that cannot be forgiven. Testing? You can get a lot of information and drawing things from that. By the way, I am not scared about the attacks I got. I didn't do anything wrong or against the law. People might get irritated once they see a threat and attacking the person is the easiest way to make the process looks biased. You can take a look on politics how they discredit themselves by using personal stuff rather than discussion the threat itself.
- That's exhausting and time consuming -
Poll
