Rate our casino ranking. Disagree with it? Tell us why.

[LuckAtlas]

Everyone here telling about betking and ggbet but how is degen.com not even on ther list? No kyc, instant withdrawals, never had a single problem with them

You put all these casinos nobody even knows and skip the one people actually use daily. Makes no sense if you want your ranking to be taken seriously. Please reconsider

built around operators licensed for the Ukrainian market — currently regulated by PlayCity, previously by KRAIL. So if a casino popular on Bitcointalk is missing, it doesn’t necessarily mean we overlooked it; it may simply fall outside the core selection criteria.

At the same time, we also look at brands that proved themselves in a regulated market and later expanded with international products. Where such an international product is available, users can access it directly from LuckAtlas.

What I’m genuinely interested in is this: should we break our own selection principle and add a separate category for strong crypto-first brands like Degen?

[WhoDaresWinz]

This thread has nothing to do on Bitcointalk, as none of the operators you promote are crypto casinos.

[Haunebu]

built around operators licensed for the Ukrainian market — currently regulated by PlayCity, previously by KRAIL. So if a casino popular on Bitcointalk is missing, it doesn’t necessarily mean we overlooked it; it may simply fall outside the core selection criteria.

At the same time, we also look at brands that proved themselves in a regulated market and later expanded with international products. Where such an international product is available, users can access it directly from LuckAtlas.

What I’m genuinely interested in is this: should we break our own selection principle and add a separate category for strong crypto-first brands like Degen?

I don't get your goal here op. You advertise mostly unknown gambling casinos through your specific site within this forum which is known for primarily crypto first gambling websites which is nonsensical to say the least. What kind of reception did y'all expect?

Go back to the drawing board, do your research and then figure out whether y'all need to break/modify your selection principles or not. Smh!

[LuckAtlas]

built around operators licensed for the Ukrainian market — currently regulated by PlayCity, previously by KRAIL. So if a casino popular on Bitcointalk is missing, it doesn’t necessarily mean we overlooked it; it may simply fall outside the core selection criteria.

At the same time, we also look at brands that proved themselves in a regulated market and later expanded with international products. Where such an international product is available, users can access it directly from LuckAtlas.

What I’m genuinely interested in is this: should we break our own selection principle and add a separate category for strong crypto-first brands like Degen?

I don't get your goal here op. You advertise mostly unknown gambling casinos through your specific site within this forum which is known for primarily crypto first gambling websites which is nonsensical to say the least. What kind of reception did y'all expect?

Go back to the drawing board, do your research and then figure out whether y'all need to break/modify your selection principles or not. Smh!

The point of LuckAtlas being on Bitcointalk is not to create yet another list of the same crypto casinos everyone here already knows. We cover a different segment of the market — operators that have worked in the regulated Ukrainian market, established themselves there, and in some cases expanded with international products.

If we simply replace that principle with a list of the most popular crypto casinos on this forum, LuckAtlas would stop being different from dozens of existing rankings.

But the question to the forum is fair: what is more useful to you — another ranking of familiar crypto-first brands, or a separate ranking covering operators from a different regulated segment of the market?

[WhoDaresWinz]

built around operators licensed for the Ukrainian market — currently regulated by PlayCity, previously by KRAIL. So if a casino popular on Bitcointalk is missing, it doesn’t necessarily mean we overlooked it; it may simply fall outside the core selection criteria.

At the same time, we also look at brands that proved themselves in a regulated market and later expanded with international products. Where such an international product is available, users can access it directly from LuckAtlas.

What I’m genuinely interested in is this: should we break our own selection principle and add a separate category for strong crypto-first brands like Degen?

I don't get your goal here op. You advertise mostly unknown gambling casinos through your specific site within this forum which is known for primarily crypto first gambling websites which is nonsensical to say the least. What kind of reception did y'all expect?

Go back to the drawing board, do your research and then figure out whether y'all need to break/modify your selection principles or not. Smh!

The point of LuckAtlas being on Bitcointalk is not to create yet another list of the same crypto casinos everyone here already knows. We cover a different segment of the market — operators that have worked in the regulated Ukrainian market, established themselves there, and in some cases expanded with international products.

If we simply replace that principle with a list of the most popular crypto casinos on this forum, LuckAtlas would stop being different from dozens of existing rankings.

But the question to the forum is fair: what is more useful to you — another ranking of familiar crypto-first brands, or a separate ranking covering operators from a different regulated segment of the market?

You are in the wrong forum. It is Bitcointalk not FIATcasinotalk. There is other iGaming industry forums you can post your site and get feedback.

There is literally no reason to promote a affiliate site here and ask for feedback where you only have traditional fiat online casinos, as this is a crypto community.