Bitcoin Forum
September 19, 2026, 02:50:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: WAM Coin: A RandomX Fork of Bitcoin Core v28.1 (Launching Sept 15, 2026)  (Read 428 times)
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 14, 2026, 12:37:27 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2026, 01:20:57 PM by Waleed Al80
 #1

Four days out. Everything that can be checked before the chain exists.

Mainnet opens 15 September 2026 at 00:00 UTC. This is the whole state of the
project in one post, four days from genesis, so nobody has to read the
thread backwards to find it.

The part worth your time is not the feature list. It is that almost
everything below can be verified before the chain exists
- and where
something cannot be, that is said plainly rather than left out.


WHAT IT IS

Code:
algorithm       RandomX - CPU, ASIC-hostile, key rotates every 2048 blocks
supply          22,000,000 WAM, hard cap
block reward    50 WAM, halving every 200,000 blocks (~9.1 months)
block time      120 seconds, DarkGravityWave v3 retarget every block
premine         2,000,000 WAM in the genesis block, all of it time-locked
treasury        5% of the block subsidy, ends at height 400,000
ports           9555 p2p / 9554 rpc
SLIP-44         5718349, registered with SatoshiLabs (slips PR #2051)
codebase        Bitcoin Core v28.1
licence         MIT

No presale. No ICO. No airdrop. No exchange listing. No token sale. The
chain opens at 00:00 UTC on 15 September and everyone starts from the
same block.


1. THE PREMINE IS LOCKED BY CONSENSUS, NOT BY PROMISE

2,000,000 WAM is minted in the genesis block. That is a premine and calling
it anything else would be dishonest. What is different is that not one
coin of it can move on launch day, or in the first year.


It is five outputs of 400,000 WAM each, every one behind a bare
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY script with a calendar date in it:

Code:
tranche 1    400,000 WAM    unlocks 2027-09-15
tranche 2    400,000 WAM    unlocks 2028-09-15
tranche 3    400,000 WAM    unlocks 2029-09-15
tranche 4    400,000 WAM    unlocks 2030-09-15
tranche 5    400,000 WAM    unlocks 2031-09-15

The scripts are bare, not P2SH. A P2SH output would show you a hash
and you would have to trust a redeem script published somewhere else. A bare
script puts the unlock date in the scriptPubKey where anyone reads it
directly out of block 0:

Code:
wam-cli getblock $(wam-cli getblockhash 0) 2

The locks are timestamps, not block heights. A height-based lock of
"262,980 blocks" only equals one year if the chain holds 120 s per block
forever; if hashrate falls, a four-year promise silently becomes five. The
public will hold this schedule to calendar dates, so calendar dates are what
consensus enforces.

An earlier design had the first tranche liquid at genesis, described as
working capital. It was removed. The 5% treasury already covers operating
cost, so the only thing an unlocked tranche bought was 400,000 WAM the
founder could sell on day one into a market with no liquidity - the exact
shape of the objection every premine attracts, granted for no benefit.


2. THE TREASURY ENDS, AND IT COMES OUT OF THE SUBSIDY

5% of the block subsidy goes to a development treasury. It is carved out
of
the reward, not added on top of it, so emission and the hard cap are
untouched:

Code:
epoch 0    miner 47.5 WAM + all fees      treasury 2.5 WAM    total 50

Transaction fees are never touched. They are the miner's entirely.

And it stops:

Code:
heights       1 .. 200,000    2.50 WAM/block     500,000 WAM
heights 200,001 .. 400,000    1.25 WAM/block     250,000 WAM
heights 400,001 ..            0
                                             --------------
lifetime treasury                              750,000 WAM

Roughly eighteen months of funding, then miners take 100% of the subsidy
forever. A permanent 5% tax reads to a miner as a tax for twenty-five years.
The same money over a fixed published window is launch funding. RandomX's
audience is precisely the audience that cares about the difference.


3. THE RELEASES ARE SIGNED, AND THERE IS ONE COMMAND TO CHECK IT

Until 3 September the releases carried SHA256SUMS and nothing else. A
checksum file hosted beside the file it describes proves only that both came
from the same place: whoever can replace the binary can replace the list,
and the two agree perfectly. It protects against a corrupted download. It
protects against nobody.

Every release from v0.1.6 is signed with an offline key:

Code:
4BD4 A8D3 AFD4 3F5C BCB5  00E2 3798 462F E00A DBA4

Code:
https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases/tag/v0.1.7

Download the release, SHA256SUMS and SHA256SUMS.asc into one directory.
Then get the checker and the public key from the repository - deliberately
a different place from the binary - and run it:

Code:
curl -LO https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases/download/v0.1.7/SHA256SUMS
curl -LO https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases/download/v0.1.7/SHA256SUMS.asc
curl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/main/scripts/verify_release.sh
curl -LO https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/main/SIGNING-KEY.asc
bash verify_release.sh .

It refuses to print ok unless three things hold: the signature is good, it
was made by that fingerprint, and the file in front of you is the
file that fingerprint signed for. It verifies in a throwaway keyring, so it
does not touch yours, and the fingerprint - not the key file - is the trust
anchor. Check that fingerprint over HTTPS, here, and not in this post - a
post is exactly the thing an attacker gets to write:

Code:
https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/blob/main/SECURITY.md


4. THERE IS A TESTNET, AND IT HAS BEEN RUNNING FOR SIX WEEKS

Code:
testnet genesis    2026-08-01
height now         8,291
independent nodes  2 people outside this project have run one

Two. Not a number worth inflating, and deliberately not a count of who is
connected at this instant -- people close their laptops, and a figure that
becomes false when somebody goes to bed is not worth printing.

They do not dip in and out. The first found the network on 2 September and
has been on it since, and one single connection of his was measured at 135
hours -- five days and six hours unbroken, ended by a restart of ours and
not of his. The second built under WSL on Windows this week, synced from
genesis, and his node reported the same block hash at height 7738 that
ours did. He then mined: his miner rebuilt its RandomX dataset across a key
rotation and did not drop a share. Until this week both of those had only
ever been proved on our own machines.

The seeds are ours, and saying otherwise would be the first checkable lie
in this post.
5. THE LAUNCH IS BEING REHEARSED, AND WHAT EACH REHEARSAL FINDS IS
PUBLISHED


One rehearsal a day until launch. Not because something is expected to be
wrong, but because every rehearsal so far has found something no amount of
reading found, and how much a rehearsal still finds is the only
honest measure of whether this is ready.

docs/REHEARSALS.md carries the schedule and a table of what each one found,
including the days that found nothing. Some of what is in there:

Code:
28 Aug   a pre-launch mainnet node cannot survive a restart
29 Aug   ElectrumX ports 50001-50004 collided between networks
30 Aug   wallets are not created under wallets/ unless it already exists
 4 Sep   four defects in two hours, in the pool, explorer and announcer
 4 Sep   the verify command in section 3 told a first-time reader that a
         correctly signed release was FORGED. It resolved its own location
         after changing directory, so it never found the public key and
         fell back to a keyring that, for a first-time reader, is empty.
         Found by running it the way a stranger runs it -- clean machine,
         nothing imported -- rather than from inside the repository, where
         it had always passed. Fixed and re-proved before this post
 7 Sep   the launch-night announcement command failed before reaching its
         own safety check. Two files disagreed about where the config
         lives, so the guard that stops the announcement going out on the
         wrong chain never ran at all
 8 Sep   the signed channel list verified on this disk and was BAD in the
         repository. It was signed with CRLF line endings and git stores
         LF, so the file and its signature differed by 142 bytes and
         anybody cloning got "BAD signature" -- which reads as tampering
10 Sep   a Windows build and a macOS build each synced the test chain from
         genesis and agreed with the Linux nodes block for block. The
         first independent node under WSL, and the first outside miner,
         both reported by people who are not us
11 Sep   a third seed node, and the clean machine found five more: both
         production servers were carrying a v0.1.5 wallet tool in PATH
         beside a v0.1.7 node, and the runtime library line this project
         publishes names a package that does not exist on Ubuntu 24.04

A project that publishes its defect list before launch is doing something
unusual, and it is deliberate. Read it and judge for yourself whether the
rate is falling fast enough.


WHAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO PRETEND

  • No security audit. Two independent developers read the consensus
    changes and their findings were adopted. Peer review is not an audit and we
    will not call it one.
  • The hashrate will be small. True of every new proof-of-work
    chain, and not made less true by omitting it. A chain with little hashrate
    can be reorganised by somebody renting enough CPU. That costs money to those
    who accept payment on few confirmations - exchanges mostly, not people
    holding coins. We ask 20 confirmations wallet-to-wallet, 60 for an exchange
    deposit, and we will publish a review of those numbers against measured
    hashrate rather than quietly leaving them.
  • No exchange, no price, no listing. There is nothing to buy. If
    someone offers you WAM before 15 September, they are selling something that
    does not exist.
  • No pre-built Windows or macOS binary yet. Linux x86_64, and
    building from source.


LINKS

Code:
website     https://wamcoin.org
source      https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin
telegram    https://t.me/wam_coin_updates
x           https://x.com/WAMCoinCore
discord     https://discord.gg/Gxvmrjy9Qb
bluesky     https://bsky.app/profile/wamcoin.org
youtube     https://www.youtube.com/@WAMcoin-l1z
reddit      https://www.reddit.com/user/WAMCoinCore/
tiktok      https://www.tiktok.com/@wamcoin
twitch      https://www.twitch.tv/wamcoin
email       wam.coin.official@proton.me

There are no others -- no second account on any platform above, no "support"
account, no exchange listing, no presale, no airdrop. The full list is signed,
and checkable rather than merely believed:
https://wamcoin.org/CHANNELS.txt

The Bluesky handle @wamcoin.org is not a name chosen on Bluesky, it is the
domain itself -- granted only to whoever can write a DNS record under it. So
it proves itself without trusting us and without trusting Bluesky:

  dig +short TXT _atproto.wamcoin.org

The Reddit account u/WAMCoinCore is ours. One post was made from it and Reddit
removed it under a temporary spam restriction -- a new account posting external
links -- so the page looks empty.
Nobody official will ever message you first, ask for a seed phrase, or offer
you an allocation.


RUN A NODE

Code:
git clone https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin
cd wam-coin && ./install.sh

Builds from source, checks its own checksums, and requires no trust in a
binary anybody handed you.

Four days. Questions here get answered.
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2026, 12:42:56 AM
 #2

WAM Coin — a RandomX fork of Bitcoin Core v28.1, launching 15 September 2026.
Review welcome.

WAM is a fork of Bitcoin Core v28.1, not a rewrite. Roughly 250,000 lines of
networking, script and wallet code are inherited from a codebase that has been
adversarially reviewed for fifteen years. About 3,000 lines are ours.

What differs:
* 22,000,000 hard cap, 2-minute blocks, 50 WAM initial subsidy
* RandomX proof of work, so CPUs stay competitive
* DarkGravityWave v3, retargeting every block
* A consensus-enforced 5% treasury output that stops permanently at block 400,000
* Founder reserve of 2,000,000 locked in genesis by OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY,
  releasing 20% a year to 2030

Founder + treasury is 12.50% of supply. Both are disclosed and enforced by
every node.

Every upstream change is a scripted, anchored transformation in
scripts/patch_upstream.py — no patch files — so --list prints every difference
from Bitcoin Core with its rationale. There has been no third-party security
audit.

Testnet is live. Two seed nodes, France and Singapore. A node finds the network
by itself through DNS; there is a prebuilt release on GitHub, 11 MB, needing
libevent and libsqlite3 and nothing else.

github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin · wamcoin.org

I would value review of the consensus changes in src/wam/ in particular.


Bug bounty

Report privately. Do not post a consensus or security bug in this thread — a
public consensus bug is an attack that has not happened yet. Email
wam.coin.official@proton.me, or open a GitHub Security Advisory on the
repository. SECURITY.md has the details.

In scope: src/wam/ (consensus, subsidy, treasury, DGW, RandomX), the stratum
pool in pool/, scripts/patch_upstream.py, and the release tooling.

Out of scope: inherited Bitcoin Core code — report those upstream; DoS against
the testnet; anything needing physical access or social engineering.

Rewards, paid in mainnet WAM after launch, from the founder reserve:
* Consensus split, inflation beyond the 22,000,000 cap, or theft of pool funds — 50,000 WAM
* Remote crash, or a way to steal another miner's shares — 10,000 WAM
* Everything else accepted — 1,000 WAM

Say plainly: WAM has no market value and may never have one. These figures are
units of a coin that does not trade. If that is not worth your time, I would
rather you knew before you spent it.

Duplicates and already-known issues do not qualify. I decide what is verified,
and I will publish every accepted report with credit once it is fixed.
visibleplayer
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 5


View Profile
August 17, 2026, 06:16:52 PM
 #3

We have officially launched listing applications and technical outreach with targeted platforms—including XeggeX, TradeOgre, NonKYC, and Bisq—ahead of our Mainnet launch on September 15, 2026.
Xeggex and tradeogre are perfect as a start exchange  Grin Grin Grin
If it was 2 years ago  Grin Grin Grin
Dumb scammer
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 19, 2026, 02:39:43 PM
 #4

[CORRECTION — my previous update was wrong, and I am fixing it myself]

That update was written with help and I posted it without reading it
closely enough. It is my account, so it is my mistake. Two things in it
were wrong.

FIRST, the venues. It named XeggeX, TradeOgre and NonKYC. I have not
contacted any of them. The enquiries I actually sent went to Komodo
Wallet, BasicSwap DEX, Bisq, Maya Protocol, Haveno and Block DX — venues
that settle native assets by atomic swap or a peer-to-peer order book,
which is the category that fits a layer 1 like this. If anyone checked
with the three named above they would rightly have been told nobody had
heard of me.

SECOND, what those enquiries are. They ask what each venue requires in
order to list. Nothing has been agreed, no application has been accepted,
and there is no timeline. The post said this "ensures trading
infrastructure, DEX capability, and immediate liquidity from Day 1". It
ensures none of those, and nobody can promise liquidity.

Plainly: WAM has no market value, is listed nowhere, and may never be.
There is no price and no way to buy it. It is mined or it is nothing.

WAM is also its own layer 1, not a token on another chain, so it cannot
appear on an automated market maker such as Uniswap without a bridge and
a wrapped representation — the same reason Monero does not.

The technical claims stand and are checkable. Every difference from
Bitcoin Core v28.1 is a scripted transformation in
scripts/patch_upstream.py; run it with --list to read all of them with
their reasons. The founder reserve is 2,000,000 WAM and none of it is
spendable at launch — all five tranches sit behind
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, opening one a year from 2027 to 2031. Those locks
are bare scripts in the genesis block, so you can read the dates out of
block 0 rather than take my word for them.

github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin

I would rather be the person who corrects this in public than the person
who leaves it up.
visibleplayer
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 162
Merit: 5


View Profile
August 19, 2026, 06:20:17 PM
 #5

[CORRECTION — my previous update was wrong, and I am fixing it myself]

That update was written with help and I posted it without reading it
closely enough. It is my account, so it is my mistake. Two things in it
were wrong.

FIRST, the venues. It named XeggeX, TradeOgre and NonKYC. I have not
contacted any of them. The enquiries I actually sent went to Komodo
Wallet, BasicSwap DEX, Bisq, Maya Protocol, Haveno and Block DX — venues
that settle native assets by atomic swap or a peer-to-peer order book,
which is the category that fits a layer 1 like this. If anyone checked
with the three named above they would rightly have been told nobody had
heard of me.

SECOND, what those enquiries are. They ask what each venue requires in
order to list. Nothing has been agreed, no application has been accepted,
and there is no timeline. The post said this "ensures trading
infrastructure, DEX capability, and immediate liquidity from Day 1". It
ensures none of those, and nobody can promise liquidity.

Plainly: WAM has no market value, is listed nowhere, and may never be.
There is no price and no way to buy it. It is mined or it is nothing.

WAM is also its own layer 1, not a token on another chain, so it cannot
appear on an automated market maker such as Uniswap without a bridge and
a wrapped representation — the same reason Monero does not.

The technical claims stand and are checkable. Every difference from
Bitcoin Core v28.1 is a scripted transformation in
scripts/patch_upstream.py; run it with --list to read all of them with
their reasons. The founder reserve is 2,000,000 WAM and none of it is
spendable at launch — all five tranches sit behind
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, opening one a year from 2027 to 2031. Those locks
are bare scripts in the genesis block, so you can read the dates out of
block 0 rather than take my word for them.

github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin

I would rather be the person who corrects this in public than the person
who leaves it up.
Good luck scammer
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 21, 2026, 02:14:25 AM
 #6

**WAM Coin — asking for review and testnet miners**

WAM is a Bitcoin Core v28.1 fork using RandomX, so it mines on an ordinary CPU. 22,000,000 cap, halving every 200,000 blocks, 2-minute blocks. No premine sale, no ICO, no allocation to anyone but a founder reserve that is time-locked and a treasury that takes 5% of the subsidy for the first 400,000 blocks. Both addresses are in the source and enforced by every node.

**Testnet is live now. Mainnet launches 15 September 2026.**

Two things would help more than anything else:

**1. Run a node, or point a CPU at the testnet pool.** It takes about five minutes, costs nothing, and the guide is written for someone who has never done it — every command, and what each number on screen means.
<https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/blob/main/docs/START_HERE.md>

**2. Read the consensus code.** Two developers outside the project have reviewed it and found two real security holes — a Redis instance reachable without a password, and a share-accounting race. Both are fixed and the whole exchange is in the repository. Nobody has been paid to audit the consensus changes, which is the part where a mistake costs the most. There is a bounty:
<https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/blob/main/SECURITY.md>

**What I am not asking for:** money, or attention for a price. There is no price. Testnet coins are worth nothing and cannot become real coins — the testnet has already been wiped and restarted twice this month, once because a consensus rule changed underneath blocks that had already been mined.

Source: <https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin>
Explorer: <https://explorer.wamcoin.org>
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 23, 2026, 11:26:31 PM
Last edit: August 24, 2026, 05:53:47 PM by Welsh
 #7

v0.1.5 — mandatory before mainnet on 15 September

This release changes a consensus rule, so it is not an optional upgrade.

Every release before v0.1.5 enforces a different mainnet treasury
address. A node still running v0.1.4 or earlier on launch day will
reject every valid block and fork itself off the network at height 1.
There is no error for this. The node syncs, mines, and reports itself
healthy — on a chain with nobody else on it.

Testnet is unaffected today. Mainnet will not be.

Download
https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases/tag/v0.1.5

Verify before running it:
Code:
sha256sum --ignore-missing -c SHA256SUMS

The binaries for v0.1.3 and v0.1.4 were removed deliberately. v0.1.3
could not send a transaction at all — no wallet on the chain could,
because estimatesmartfee has no data on a chain whose only transactions
are coinbases, and the fallback was disabled. If you have either version
on disk, replace it.

Where the project is
Testnet has been running since 20 August. Two independent nodes joined
this week and have stayed up, one in Europe and one in North America —
neither of them ours. The pool pays every ten minutes, encrypted stratum
is on 3336, and two Electrum servers run on separate providers.

Every claim on the site has a command that proves or disproves it:
Code:
python3 scripts/verify_supply.py
python3 scripts/patch_upstream.py --list
bash scripts/sweep.sh

No paid audit has been done. Two independent developers reviewed the
code and their findings were adopted, and the site says exactly that.

Still no price, no presale, no allocation, and nothing to buy.
If you run a node

Subscribe to releases on GitHub. It is the one channel that reaches a
node operator at the moment it matters, whether or not you follow
anything else:

github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin → Watch ▾ → Custom → Releases ✓

A consensus change is not something you want to hear about a week late.
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 25, 2026, 10:48:24 AM
 #8

v0.1.6 released -- the miner survives a pool that stops talking

This one is for miners. Consensus is untouched: a node on v0.1.5 and a node
on v0.1.6 agree on every block, and no node has to do anything for it.

What went wrong

On 24 August a miner on our testnet held one job for six hours. The pool
had sent it at 06:18 for height 1370. The chain reached 1430 without it. At
12:36 a worker solved that six-hour-old job -- work on a block already
buried sixty deep -- and then the hash rate went to zero.

Nothing was broken in a way anything could see. The TCP connection was
half-open: recv() returned neither zero nor an error, so the miner
had no event to react to, and SO_KEEPALIVE is set but Linux waits two hours
before its first probe. The process was alive, the connection was
"established", and it was carrying nothing.

It was found because the machine's owner noticed the fan had gone quiet.
That is not a monitoring system.

What changed

The miner measures the silence itself now. Ten minutes with nothing at all
from the pool -- no job, no reply to a share, nothing -- and the connection
is treated as dead whatever the socket claims, and it reconnects.

Two things about it were wrong before it shipped, and both were caught by
testing it rather than by reasoning about it:

  • The check has to come after the read. Placed before, it measures
    how long the miner went without looking, not how long the pool went without
    speaking -- and it fired while a job sat unread in the kernel buffer.
  • Time in which the miner was not listening cannot be charged to the pool.
    RandomX rebuilds its dataset on a seed change, which stopped the loop for 78
    seconds when measured, and the first two versions counted that as silence
    and threw away a healthy connection holding a fresh job.

Verified in three directions before release: a silent pool with no job
(reconnects), a silent pool while holding a job across a 79-second dataset
rebuild (no false alarm, then reconnects on the real silence), and the live
pool for 170 seconds with the threshold lowered to 60 (never fires, shares
accepted throughout).

WAM_MINER_SILENCE_SECONDS overrides the ten minutes, so the
behaviour can be watched in a minute instead of ten. A watchdog nobody has
seen fire is a watchdog nobody can vouch for.

It fired in the wild the next morning

Code:
11:15:12  no job or reply from the pool for 601s -- reconnecting
11:15:13  connected / subscribed / authorized
11:15:24  share accepted

Same machine, same failure, ten minutes instead of six hours, and it
recovered without anyone touching it.

And it found something else

That machine runs inside WSL on a laptop, and Windows had paused the virtual
machine from 07:19 to 11:05. The guest kernel recorded no suspend at all --
CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_BOOTTIME were still exactly equal afterwards -- so
no monotonic time had passed and there was no silence for the watchdog to
measure. It was right and useless.

The wall clock is the one thing that did move. The next release compares the
two: when real time has run far ahead of monotonic time, the process was not
running, and any socket it holds is one the far end stopped hearing from
long ago. That is committed but not released; the watchdog already recovers
this case in ten minutes on its own, and a second release on the same day as
the first is worse than waiting.

Download

Code:
curl -LO https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases/download/v0.1.6/wam-miner-v0.1.6-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
curl -LO https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases/download/v0.1.6/SHA256SUMS
sha256sum --ignore-missing -c SHA256SUMS

Release notes

If you run a node

Nothing here is for you, but v0.1.5 is still the release you need. Anything
older enforces a consensus payout to the burn placeholder, and on 15
September it will reject every valid block and fork itself off mainnet at
height 1 -- and nothing will tell it, because the protocol carries blocks,
not notices.

Standing disclosure

WAM is testnet software until 15 September 2026. The coins have no market
value and may never have one. Two independent developers have reviewed the
code and their findings were adopted; no security firm has audited it.
Everything is built by CI from a tag, so the published binaries and the
documented build cannot drift apart.

Source: https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin
Site: https://wamcoin.org
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 26, 2026, 09:43:29 PM
 #9

WAM Coin registered in SLIP-0044 and SLIP-0173

SatoshiLabs merged the entry into master on 26 August 2026.

Code:
SLIP-0044   coin type  5718349
SLIP-0173   prefix     wam  ·  twam  ·  wamrt

What it means

The coin type and the bech32 prefixes are reserved to this chain and to no
other. Any wallet deriving a WAM address has one correct answer to look up
instead of guessing, and nobody else can take wam.

It also settles a confusion that had already cost us a review here and
elsewhere. A Bisq maintainer went looking for WAM, found an unrelated BEP-20
token of the same name on BNB Chain, and wrote that he saw no project
related to it. That was a fair thing to conclude from what was findable at
the time. From today, anyone checking finds WAM Coin in the registry
SatoshiLabs keeps.

What it does not mean

It is not an endorsement, not a listing, and not a promise that any wallet
will add support. Registration checks that a coin is real and that its
numbers do not collide -- not that it is any good. Nobody should read more
into it than that, and we are not going to imply more.

Verified against the binary before it was written down

A registration that disagrees with the code is worse than no registration,
so it was checked in that direction first:

Code:
slip-0044.md   | 5718349 | WAM | WAM Coin |
wam-params.h   static constexpr uint32_t WAM_BIP44_COIN_TYPE = 0x57414D;

slip-0173.md   | WAM Coin | wam | twam | wamrt |
chainparams.cpp  bech32_hrp = "wam";    (mainnet)
                 bech32_hrp = "twam";   (testnet)
                 bech32_hrp = "wamrt";  (regtest)

0x57414D is 5,718,349, and is also the letters WAM in ASCII.

Read it without taking our word for any of it:
https://github.com/satoshilabs/slips/blob/master/slip-0044.md
https://github.com/satoshilabs/slips/blob/master/slip-0173.md

Unrelated, and standing

Mainnet opens 15 September 2026. Anything older than v0.1.5 enforces a
consensus payout to the burn placeholder and will reject every valid block
from height 1, forking itself off with nothing to tell it -- the protocol
carries blocks, not notices. WAM is testnet software until then; the coins
have no market value and may never have one. Two independent developers have
reviewed the code and their findings were adopted; no security firm has
audited it.

Source: https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 04, 2026, 01:34:01 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2026, 01:31:59 PM by Waleed Al80
 #10

This was the 4 September version of the announcement. The post at the top of this thread is kept current instead, so there is only one copy to read and only one to trust.

Two things in this old copy were wrong by 11 September and are worth naming rather than quietly deleting:

- it said "eleven days out" -- it is four
- it said "No Reddit". u/WAMCoinCore is ours, registered on 10 August so nobody else could take the name. One post was made from it and Reddit removed it under a temporary spam restriction, so the page looks empty. Denying our own account was our mistake, not evidence of anything.

The signed list of every account that is ours: https://wamcoin.org/CHANNELS.txt
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 05, 2026, 09:29:19 PM
 #11

WAM Coin v0.1.7 — a node can find the network when DNS cannot be trusted

NOT MANDATORY. No consensus rule changed. A node on v0.1.6 validates exactly
the same blocks, connects to the same peers, and is in no danger. Upgrade when
convenient.

WHAT CHANGED

Fixed seed nodes are compiled into the binary for the first time. Until now the
three names in chainparams were the only way a new node could discover WAM, so
whoever could forge one DNS answer for seed1.wamcoin.org decided who every
newcomer met -- without touching a block, a key or a rule, and without anything
in the project noticing. The domain's transfer and delete locks were already
on; the zone was not signed, and now is.

Only machines this project runs are in that list. A fixed seed is compiled into
every copy of the software and cannot be withdrawn from binaries already
downloaded, so an independent operator's address does not go in without their
explicit consent, and neither operator has been asked.

The binaries stop naming a different coin. wam-cli was telling people to "make
sure the bitcoind server is running" and to run `bitcoin-cli -help`, which is
what a stranger sees at the exact moment something has gone wrong. Thirty-seven
such strings across eleven files, message text only -- the include paths, source
filenames and makefile variables are untouched, and half the tests for that
rename assert what it must not change.

WHAT IT DOES NOT FIX

Hashrate. The test network runs at about 11 kH/s and one ordinary desktop is a
meaningful fraction of it. That is true of every new proof-of-work chain, it is
not fixed by software, and the guidance stands: 20 confirmations
wallet-to-wallet, 60 for an exchange deposit.

DOWNLOAD

    https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases

VERIFYING THIS RELEASE

    git clone https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin
    bash wam-coin/scripts/verify_release.sh ~/Downloads

Not sha256sum alone. A checksum file hosted beside the file it describes proves
only that both came from the same place: whoever replaces the binary replaces
the list, and the two agree perfectly. The signature is the part that cannot be
produced without the key, and the key is not on any machine this project
exposes to the internet.

Check the signing fingerprint over HTTPS, at

    https://github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/blob/main/SECURITY.md

not against the release page. A release page is something an attacker gets to
write, and so is a forum post.

This is testnet software. The coins have no market value and may never have
any. Two independent developers have reviewed the code and their findings were
adopted; no security firm has audited it.
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 12, 2026, 07:06:08 PM
 #12

v0.1.8 — Windows and macOS, signed

WAM now publishes signed binaries for three operating systems. Node and
miner for each, in one release, covered by one checksum list and one key
that is kept off every machine that touches the internet.

github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases/tag/v0.1.8

Code:
Linux    x86_64          node + miner
Windows  x86_64          node + miner     new
macOS    Apple Silicon   node + miner     new

No WSL, no building, no installer. Archives and a terminal on all three.

Why this and not something else

WAM uses RandomX so that an ordinary desktop processor can compete for
blocks. Most ordinary desktops do not run Linux, and until today this
project asked those people to install one before they could take part in
the proof of work — which excluded the exact audience the algorithm was
chosen for. The node had cross-compiled for Windows since 7 September; what
was missing was the miner, and nobody had noticed.

What was measured

No platform was published because it compiled. Each had to sync the test
chain from the genesis block, over the real peer-to-peer protocol, and
agree with the Linux nodes at heights 0, 1, 5000 and 6000. Block 1 is where
the 5% treasury rule is first enforced, so a binary that disagrees about
consensus disagrees there.

That gate ran on the archives that are on the release page — after
stripping and packaging, not on an earlier build of them. It is the reason
the workflow packages first and tests second.

Each miner passed its own self-test on the platform it is built for,
including both of RandomX's official test vectors. A miner whose RandomX
disagrees with the network hashes all day, finds nothing, and reports no
error at all, so that check is the whole question and not a formality.

The Windows miner was then pointed at the testnet pool from an ordinary
desktop:

Code:
10 shares accepted      0 rejected
block 8478              recorded and paid by the pool

Zero rejected is the number worth reading. A single byte-order mistake in
the header, the nonce or the target comparison gives every share rejected,
with no error message — a miner that hashes correctly and finds nothing.

macOS is built natively on macOS rather than cross-compiled, so its miner
runs its own self-test on the machine that produced it. That is a shorter
chain of custody than the Windows one, not a longer one.

Two warnings, because you will meet them

Windows Defender deletes the miner. Fourteen seconds into its first
run it was removed and reported as Trojan:Win32/Bearfoos.A!ml. It is a false
positive and we cannot make it go away. A program that opens a network
connection and then uses every core behaves exactly like the cryptojacking
malware that infects people without asking; no scanner can separate them by
behaviour, because the behaviour is the same. The difference is that you
chose this one, and it mines to the address on its own command line and
nowhere else. The only thing that removes the warning is a publisher
certificate, and this project has not bought one.

What to do: check the file, not the verdict. If you want to mine, allow that
one file by name — never a folder, and never the whole machine. If you would
rather not, the node is a separate archive, is not a miner, and is not
normally flagged. Anyone claiming to be us and telling you to switch your
antivirus off entirely is not us.

macOS refuses to run them at all, the first time. Not a virus report:
the binaries are not notarised, which requires a paid Apple developer
account. One command clears the quarantine flag on three named files, and it
is not "disable Gatekeeper". Run it after you have checked the signature,
not before.

Apple Silicon only. A binary for one architecture does not run on the other,
and asking a free public repository for a second macOS runner per build
costs hours in a queue. Intel Macs build it in about twenty minutes.

Checking it

Code:
Linux and macOS   scripts/verify_release.sh
Windows           scripts/verify_release.ps1

The PowerShell one is new in this release, for a reason worth stating: the
verifier that guarded every release until now is a bash script, and the
audience a Windows build was added for cannot run it. What the documentation
told them instead was to compare sixty-four hexadecimal characters by eye,
which nobody does — people check the first four and the last four, which is
the check an attacker would design for.

Seven lines for each platform, and both warnings in full

A correction

For about seven hours on 12 September the checksum list on that release page
did not match its own signature. A file was replaced and its signature was
not, so anyone who verified in that window was told the signature was
invalid — about a release that was sound. It is fixed: six files, one list,
one signature, and you can confirm that from the page rather than from this
post. If you saw that failure, download again.

Two things came out of it. The announcement bot now refuses to say anything
about a release that does not verify, and the published release is now
watched from more than one machine and alarms when it stops verifying. The
check that would have caught this existed already and ran only when somebody
remembered to run it.

Still testnet

These coins are worth nothing and will not become real ones. The test chain
has been wiped before and may be again. Mainnet is 15 September 2026, 00:00
UTC.
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2026, 10:56:10 AM
 #13

WAM mainnet has been live for twelve hours. Facts, not a pitch —
every one is checkable without us.

  height 384 · network 2.18 MH/s · blocks every ~2 minutes
  every block since block 1 has paid the treasury by consensus
  our pool has found 12 blocks and PAID 568.40 WAM to miners
  https://pool.wamcoin.org/api/payments  — the txids are there

Two things changed today, which matter if you tried us last night
and gave up:

  The pool takes 0%. Not a promotion. While one operator writes
  most of this chain, the project's own pool has no business
  earning from miners.

  And we had a real bug: the share difficulty floor was computed
  from the same rule as the ceiling, so every miner sat on one
  value and a small CPU waited hours for a single share. A miner
  called it "solo mining with extra steps" and he was right. Fixed
  this morning — miners who had made three shares in eight hours
  made six in the first half-minute after the restart.

The number we publish whether it flatters us or not:

  https://explorer.wamcoin.org/api/concentration

One finder holds 79.2% of the last 48 blocks. Twelve hours ago it
was 97.5%, and there were two distinct finders. There are now six.
It fell because people acted — one miner left the biggest pool and
started his own to mine solo on it.

So if you mine: pick any pool but the largest, or do what he did
and run your own. The pool code is in the repository and we will
help you set it up for free, including if you compete with us.

    ours          stratum+tcp://pool.wamcoin.org:3333   0%
    CryptoPickaxe stratum.cryptopickaxe.co.uk:6040      1%
    ARIA          wam.ariabrain.com:3333                1%

Mine on a CPU: https://wamcoin.org/mine/

WAM has no market value and may never have one. Nothing here is a
price, and nobody will buy it back from you.
BoozyTalking
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 391
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2026, 12:19:51 PM
 #14

Mining not work, and useless, owned by big mining farm.
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2026, 09:02:06 PM
 #15

Three claims, and the first one is the only one I can fix for you
— so let me start there.

"Mining not work." There were three real causes today, two of them
ours:

  1. Until this morning the pool's share difficulty floor was
     computed from the same rule as the ceiling, so every miner
     sat on one value and a small CPU waited hours for a single
     share. Our own fault, fixed, tested. If you tried before
     ~09:45 UTC that is what you hit.
  2. Our mining guide still said port 13333 — the testnet pool,
     which was converted at launch and answers nothing. Fixed on
     all three pages.
  3. An address beginning twam1 is a TESTNET address; the mainnet
     pool refuses it. It must start with wam1 or W.

Which symptom did you see? Post the miner's last three lines and I
will tell you exactly what is wrong, today, for free.

Does mining pay? Measured, our pool alone, 20 hours in:

  40 blocks found, 0 orphaned
  1,514.29 WAM paid out, to 14 distinct addresses
  0% pool fee — every WAM went to miners
  56,631 shares credited
  every txid public: pool.wamcoin.org/api/payments

"Owned by big mining farm." Not a farm — a POOL of 94 separate
miners, which I can read off its own public dashboard. The coins
are spread across those 94; what is concentrated is the hash rate
under one operator, and that is a real problem, not a slogan.

Note where you got the number: from our own post, in this thread.
We publish it hourly, whether it flatters us or not:
explorer.wamcoin.org/api/concentration

And what we did about it in the first day: dropped our pool fee to
zero so choosing us costs nothing, fixed the bug that was starving
small CPUs, asked the largest operator publicly to point miners
elsewhere (he agreed), and the founder committed in public not to
apply to, ask, or pay any exchange while one operator is above
50%.

You are right that it is concentrated. You are wrong that it is
hidden, and wrong that it is one farm. Try again with a wam1
address on port 3333 and tell me what happens.
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 17, 2026, 12:09:33 PM
Last edit: September 17, 2026, 07:41:55 PM by Welsh
 #16

The daily number, as promised — day 3.

Over the last 1,755 blocks, seven days' worth:

  largest single finder    72.1%
  distinct finders         10      (it was 2 on day one)
  our own pool             22.4%

And the thing that changed today, measured from both pools' own
dashboards:

  the two largest pools are now within 2% of each other
  299,617 H/s and 293,418 H/s

The uncomfortable half, said before anyone else says it: over the
last 47 blocks the largest finder is OUR pool, at 51.1%. The rule
applies to us exactly as it applied to anyone else — no exchange
application while one finder is above 50%, and that finder is
currently us on the short window. We publish both windows now,
side by side, for precisely this reason:

  explorer.wamcoin.org/api/concentration

Why two: the 48-block window swung between 100% and 51% inside a
day, which flatters and damns whoever happens to be lucky. The
seven-day window is what the condition is written against.

And a number we had never measured until today, after the founder
pointed out that our reading was incomplete — a pool address is
not a holder, it is a pass-through:

  548 addresses have ever received WAM
  540 of them are end recipients, not pools
  the largest end recipient holds 25.8% of what reached them

So: 72% of blocks found through one address, and 25.8% is the
biggest share any single person received. Both are true. The first
is reorg risk; the second is distribution. We had been publishing
only the first.

If hash rate stays level, the seven-day figure reaches 50% in
about two days and 35% in about four. We will publish it on the
days it goes the wrong way too.

WAM has no market value and may never have one.
The daily number, as promised — day 3.

  last seven days (1,773 blocks): largest finder 72.1%, 10 distinct
  right now (47 blocks, ~1.5h):   largest finder 59.6%, 3 distinct

Both are published side by side now, neither as the headline. The
short window turns over in an hour and a half, so three lucky
blocks move it twenty points and it named OUR pool as the largest
twice today. The seven-day window is what the published condition
is judged on: no exchange application while one finder is above
50%, target below 35%.

  explorer.wamcoin.org/api/concentration

Four independent pools now serve WAM. I probed all four minutes
ago: each authorises a wam1 address and is serving work on the
current tip.

  pool.wamcoin.org:3333             0%   (the project's)
  wam.ariabrain.com:3333            1%
  stratum.cryptopickaxe.co.uk:6040  1%
  pool.liquidpool.net:4333          1%

Two of them have no miners yet. A new pool with nobody on it finds
no blocks, and a pool that finds no blocks attracts nobody — the
circle breaks with the first miner. We were in it on launch night
with ten miners and two blocks. None of these is ours to recommend
over another: pick the one that is not the biggest.

And a number we had never measured until yesterday, after the
founder said our reading was incomplete — a pool address is a
pass-through, not a holder:

  548 addresses have ever received WAM
  540 of them are end recipients, not pools
  the largest end recipient holds 25.8% of what reached them

So 72% of blocks found through one address, and 25.8% is the
largest share any single person received. Both true. The first is
reorg risk; the second is distribution. We had been publishing
only the first.

Our pool, for the record: 351 blocks confirmed, 49 maturing, 0
orphaned, 16,378.96 WAM paid to miners, 0% fee.

WAM has no market value and may never have one.
Waleed Al80 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 01:01:35 PM
 #17

WAM Coin -- four days of mainnet, and a release for node operators

Mainnet opened 2026-09-15 00:00 UTC. Measured today, 2026-09-19:

  height            3,149
  network hash rate 412,686 H/s (RandomX, CPU)
  difficulty        0.0104
  block target      120 s
  mined so far      157,450 WAM of a 22,000,000 cap
  distinct finders  17, over the life of the chain
  largest finder    61.2% of all blocks

That last line is the number that matters, and it is published permanently
at explorer.wamcoin.org -- high or low, whatever it says. One party has
produced most of this chain. It is not an accusation: that operator runs the
published pool code, pays the consensus treasury in every block, and
answered publicly when asked. It is arithmetic, and the only thing that
changes it is miners choosing differently.

So, plainly: this chain needs hash rate that is not at the largest pool. Not
for our benefit -- the founder does not mine, and the project's own condition
is that no exchange is approached while one finder is above 50%.

v0.1.9 is out and is NOT mandatory. It sets nMinimumChainWork on mainnet,
which was zero until now, so a node installed today cannot be walked onto a
cheap fabricated history by the first peer it meets. A v0.1.8 node accepts
exactly the same blocks and needs no update. Why it was not set at launch,
and what it does not protect against, are in the release notes -- including
the fact that it is a floor, not a shield.

  releases  github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/releases
  verify    SHA256SUMS.asc is signed; fingerprint:
            github.com/wam-coin-official/wam-coin/blob/main/SECURITY.md
  start     wamcoin.org/start/
  mine      stratum+tcp://pool.wamcoin.org:3333 -- fee 0%

Linux, Windows and macOS (Apple Silicon) downloads are signed and covered by
the same checksum file.

No listing, no price, no presale. There is nothing to buy. If that is not
interesting, it is the wrong project to read about.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!