Crash game with runner-style gameplay — more interesting than the classic graph?

[Cantsay]

Curious what experienced crash players think:

— Does the visual/gameplay format matter to you, or mostly RTP and math?

I think I lean towards the RTP rather than the visuals, because I haven't really ended a game that gave me more wins just because it has a bad GUI.

— Would you play something like this instead of a classic crash game?
— What matters most to you in this type of game: fast rounds, high multipliers, or the gameplay itself?

You should keep in mind that a lot of gamblers are already used to the classic crash game, so even if you come up with more interesting visuals, they might not think about it too much, but it is still not a bad idea. It could be used as a differentiator for your site, so people would be able to know that they can only find that specific crash on your site and if it performs well than what we think on this thread it could take your site on a different projection.

[Ayers]

While fast round are exciting to watch, they also mean we are making more turnover at the same time.

Does the visual/gameplay format matter to you, or mostly RTP and math?
Would you play something like this instead of a classic crash game?
What matters most to you in this type of game: fast rounds, high multipliers, or the gameplay itself?

My answer to your question would be,
Yes, visual or gameplay matters, but after math.
I can play runner-style version, if underlying mechanic and fairness are clear.
I would value fair RTP, transparent rule and controllable cashout more than fast round.
High multiplier are certainly attractive. But they can create lot of variance. just showing a higher multiplier doesn't make any game better.

[red4slash]

The visual Format is sometimes a special attraction but not all gamblers are looking for it because some will be more interested in the RTP given so in this case it depends on the perspective and interest of the gambler so that until now the site always gives changes that are increasingly leading to visuals and showing better RTP because the gambler's thoughts are not all the same.

I have tried but these two types of games do not suit me, it does not mean that they are all bad but sometimes in some way The Gambler always has comfort in a game and these types of games are not very suitable for me to do.

If faced with a choice then I would prefer to follow the flow because it goes back to the initial situation where everything depends on the perspective of each but compared to the fast flow I prefer something that looks much more relaxed in terms of gameplay. For a high multiplier although it looks very good but we also certainly can not force something like this because this is not the will of the player but rather the site.

[Iranus]

Recently I tried EORunners, where the same basic crash mechanic is presented as a character run. The multiplier increases during the round, and you have to stop before the run ends.

When evaluating new format like EORunner, I first look at whether it is just hyped up an old crash game with nice wrapper. Or is there any meaningful change to gameplay? If it's just an animation change then to me it is something like cosmetic improvement. And if UX is really better but mathematical house edge is same then it might be better presentation. But that is not any better gambling proposition.

[acroman08]

— Does the visual/gameplay format matter to you, or mostly RTP and math?
— Would you play something like this instead of a classic crash game?

Doesn't really matter for me, but if the visual gameplay makes it more entertaining, I'd be fine with it, but it doesn't mean I'd prefer to play it more than the calssic crash game, I view crash game the same way I view dice game or plinko, where visual gameplay isn't imporant.

— What matters most to you in this type of game: fast rounds, high multipliers, or the gameplay itself?

It's fast rounds and high multipliers. I don't know about other but I have a feeling that a lot of gamblers that play crash game look for it too.

[Orpichukwu]

A different interface and gameplay are certainly interesting; sometimes, a change can make the game more appealing and keep the player engaged for longer. Sticking to "more of the same" isn't the best option when everything in this market looks alike. I don't play many crash games, but I do enjoy trying out new ones.

I have played different crash games, with almost all of them being the same, both the ones in local casinos and the ones from crypto casinos. At a point I will say it's boring to always be playing something with the same sound, almost the same design, etc. It's only one which I have played that has a different interface and something like the one the OP is describing; there should be more design on crash, as it’s very popular, in order to keep players intrigued.

[uneng]

Gamblers mostly prefer simle and sleek animations over the heavy one, and it will be interesting in the beginning but the game part has less relevance in gambling so it won't make a big difference in the long run and also having heavy animated game play might cause delay that can cause confusion with bet and results.

Another reason why they prefer a simple animation is because their smartphones can't support heavy graphics and might end literally crashing or working quite slow, what can prevent the gambling session from running smoothly and annoying the gambler, since he might face delays when trying to stop the game before going busted.

If developers make the game too fancy and more like a real game, the tendency is that it will reach only a minor and select group of gamblers who have superior devices. And that isn't interesting for casinos, since the more customers they reach, more profit they make.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

What do you think about a crash game where the usual graph is replaced by an actual runner-style game?

What would you be considering is about the probably fair game or not scenario here, so therefore, a number of gamblers will not consider choosing a particular platform based on what is attractive to them to live from the casino down if they could actually discover the provably fair game feature or not from the casino.

[Davidvictorson]

— Does the visual/gameplay format matter to you, or mostly RTP and math?
— Would you play something like this instead of a classic crash game?
— What matters most to you in this type of game: fast rounds, high multipliers, or the gameplay itself?

- both the visuals and RTP matter more to me. For newbies who may not be aware of the importance of the RTP, they may pick only the visuals, which of course is one of the things that draws attention first.

- it’s doesn’t matter to me

- high multipliers matters a lot to me …first then the others.

[lombok]

What do you think about a crash game where the usual graph is replaced by an actual runner-style game?

What would you be considering is about the probably fair game or not scenario here, so therefore, a number of gamblers will not consider choosing a particular platform based on what is attractive to them to live from the casino down if they could actually discover the provably fair game feature or not from the casino.

It is apparent that providing system fairness visibly is an unconditional basis that bombards all the cosmetic allurements of casinos. Proficient gamblers will not part with their capital on the ground of some unfancy differences, or seducing incentives, when the legitimacy of spin results cannot be confirmed.

Probably fair algorithms ensure real control and certainty of implementation. The purity of the computer code has also been an absolute determinant in question of credibility of an online betting platform.

[Hispo]

Recently I tried EORunners, where the same basic crash mechanic is presented as a character run. The multiplier increases during the round, and you have to stop before the run ends.

When evaluating new format like EORunner, I first look at whether it is just hyped up an old crash game with nice wrapper. Or is there any meaningful change to gameplay? If it's just an animation change then to me it is something like cosmetic improvement. And if UX is really better but mathematical house edge is same then it might be better presentation. But that is not any better gambling proposition.

It is pretty much just a different format to play crash/aviator games. It is a change of perspective and the mechanics are the same, one just needs to see the character running and decide when one wants to cash out. There is actually nothing new to see there.

Also, in order to implement an attractive variation of this crash/aviator game, the casino needs a 2,5D or 3D game, similar to android games from the early 2010s, like Subway surfers or temple run.

It may be appealing to Zoomers and new gamblers who just turned into adults and can legally gamble, but the older generations won't feel so much attracted to it.

[ralle14]

— Does the visual/gameplay format matter to you, or mostly RTP and math?
— Would you play something like this instead of a classic crash game?
— What matters most to you in this type of game: fast rounds, high multipliers, or the gameplay itself?

The few times i've played crash, I prefer the classic because something feels strange with the fancier versions, almost like there's a bit of delay.

The one time I got interested again was the gameplay, or at least seeing another casino put a different spin on their crash game by adding three types of jackpot.

[Julien_Olynpic]

More advanced graphical presentation is important to many players, especially those who play for fun. Indeed, enjoyment requires a more advanced emotional experience, which is typically associated with a more vibrant, sensuous interface or graphical presentation. However, if you're the rare person who visits a casino to make money, or if you're simply a low-emotional person and are irritated by excessive graphical noise, then a game with a sparse design is the way to go.

[Nrcewker]

I am not a hardcore crash player but yes, I do play it to make some quick profits. For me profits and RTP matter. I dont care what the character is, whether its a rocket, a graph or a person running. None of that helps me in any way. If the game is destined to crash at 1.9x, then no matter what the character is, will it give me a higher payout than 1.9x? These fancy things are for kids. A real gambler only wants the game to be fair and the house edge to be very low.

I still love Bustabit’s crash game because it was one of the OG crash games that I played and won big with it.

[TheUltraElite]

One user even made a worm digging deeper as the graphic but that site was never created and the user also never responded back.

Its all to keep the boring graphic away and give something new to the players, imagination has got no bounds and gamblers love to watch colorful things go round and round. What I like is a casino crash game that is fair, but quite a lot of others will like the graphics to be cool as well, they got to flex that PC gaming setup as well.

To me the game running smoothly and an option to invest in the bankroll are the good things.

[viljy]

Runner is good for playing on a phone. It’s a classic way to kill time (right after all sorts of balls). But I practically don’t play gambling games on my phone. And I very rarely play crash‑like games like Aviator. So, probably not, it won’t interest me... By the way, there’s an implicit side effect: when playing crash runner on your phone, you risk smashing the phone onto the ground out of anger, because it’s easy to lose a lot of money in such a gambling game in one go (well, that’s a joke... although).

[OsaiEmma]

— Does the visual/gameplay format matter to you, or mostly RTP and math?
— Would you play something like this instead of a classic crash game?
— What matters most to you in this type of game: fast rounds, high multipliers, or the gameplay itself?

1) Personally, the visual doesn't matter. It's just the adrenaline rush, the fact I could multiply my money in such a short time. I don't really do any math because I don't know any to apply here, everything is pretty random to me; certainly, RTP is important.

2) Well, honestly I don't mind playing it, if I play and I feel it's fun, I don't mind continuing.

3) I think high multipliers are my number one: the higher the multiplier, the higher my winning potential. Next is provably fair mechanism: I don't want to play where the game is being manipulated.

Although, I don't often play this game, but whenever I do, I know I'm going for a high risk high reward gambling where I can lose everything in just a short period of time.