Most crypto gambling sites have 1x wagering requirements

[PX-Z]

A more user friendly thing to do though would be to reduce it, instead of 1x it can lower, like what Duelbits is doing, sure 10% is something money launderers can manage but it's still a deterrent.

Duelbits is just being far too generous with that. They could simply increase the wagering requirement to 1x, or even something below that, such as 0.8x.

I also wonder how they would defend their position if bad actors were to use the platform for laundering funds, and of course, authorities will eventually can trace the transactions back to them. If that were to happen, the platform would presumably have to explain why such a low or i say, nonexistent wagering requirement was considered sufficient from the perspective of platform that follows aml protocols or whatever you call that.

[Filicius]

After that, I was able to withdraw my fund directly to my wallet without any hassle regarding 1x turnover requirement . I’m not sure if this method still works, though.

I remember playing Dice in the past and setting it like 98% chances of winning, to lift the wagering requirement, but I don't think it is such a common thing nowadays because now the trend is to set certain percentage of contribution to wagering to each games (100% to slots, 10%-5% to roulette, etc.) which makes it more difficult to withdraw your balance if you haven't really risked it above the limit set by each casino.

[Junii]

Which other crypto gambling sites do you think have less than 1x wagering requirement?

Exactly you are right and i agree with you actually the 1x wagering requirement is not like a universal standard in the world of crypto casinos it usually depends on the casino and the type of there promotion and some other terms and conditions etcetera. Now casino with 0X wagering requirements i think  Jack's rake back is credited as real cash with no wagering requirement i am not confirmed on it because i didn't check it but my cousin told me and he was sure about it and duel bits is also the example you shared with a 0.1x requirement.

[Agbe]

Which other crypto gambling sites do you think have less than 1x wagering requirement?

  This 1X wagering requirement is a new requirement I am seeing here in the forum and it is not all the casinos asking for it and I have not seeing the 0X wagering requirement casino here and I made a research and saw some of the casinos out here offering free wagering or No Wagering requirement. But since there are not here I will not mention them because I don't know the legit level of those casinos.

[panjul07]

Is it a new terms by Duelbits or has it been in place for a long time? I played in duelbits long time ago but I did not realize that they have this friendly term.
10% or 0.1x wagering requirement on deposits before withdrawal can be requested is great but it can be abused easily as well IMO if people want to use duelbits as a place to launder some money.
Although KYC might be asked but I think it does not reduce the chance for people who are willing to use this friendly term for their money laundering effort.

[JiiBs]

Only Duelbits have a 0.1 x wagering requirement, right? You can check most of the casinos in the forum, on average apply 1x wager to be able to process withdrawals.

I've done a little research just now... Sportsbet, Rainbet, Whale, Vega, Betfury and some other casinos apply 1x wager.

Some I didn't check... but I'm pretty sure the majority of casinos have requirements like the one I mentioned 1x.

Regardless, I think 1x wagering requirement is quite far. After all, making a deposit for your bankroll is actually meant for gambling. So, having your gamble it all away doesn’t change the idea behind making the deposit. Surely you might win and that does boost your bankroll but still, it doesn’t mean you would withdraw both your winnings and deposit. You’re always likely to leave something behind and that still plays to the 1x wagering requirement.

Duelbit having it different to be about 0.1x it’s quite unique and cool too. It’s always much of a discomfort to find gambling sites that would want to go above the 1x.

[WhoYouCantKill]

Is it a new terms by Duelbits or has it been in place for a long time? I played in duelbits long time ago but I did not realize that they have this friendly term.
10% or 0.1x wagering requirement on deposits before withdrawal can be requested is great but it can be abused easily as well IMO if people want to use duelbits as a place to launder some money.
Although KYC might be asked but I think it does not reduce the chance for people who are willing to use this friendly term for their money laundering effort.

I do agree that the 10% requirements actually makes the rule a bit less stricter, but I wouldn’t just conclude that it automatically makes it easier for people to exploit it for money laundering. Even with that, casino would still effectively monitor transaction patterns, account activities and also source of funds, and should anything appear to be suspicious, then they’d automatically trigger a compulsory KYC.

[Dr.Bitcoin_Strange]

Most of the casino I know and have used once or twice has 1x wagering requirement, although some promotion cashback are stated as having 0x wagering. Based on my research too, I just saw that there's a casino that also has 0x wagering but there's a maximum number of times one can cash out, the casino is not on this forum, so there's no need to mention it. I also saw about two casino and another one that their requirement is 3x, 3x and 2x respectively, meanwhile they still require for KYC, I am just wondering who will play there when some people still complain about the 1x requirement.

[qurbanshah02]

Most of the casino I know and have used once or twice has 1x wagering requirement, although some promotion cashback are stated as having 0x wagering. Based on my research too, I just saw that there's a casino that also has 0x wagering but there's a maximum number of times one can cash out, the casino is not on this forum, so there's no need to mention it. I also saw about two casino and another one that their requirement is 3x, 3x and 2x respectively, meanwhile they still require for KYC, I am just wondering who will play there when some people still complain about the 1x requirement.

The advantage of this is that if you have less money, then you can work with 1x, in addition to this, the profit expectation from it will be less than 2x. Although it is very beneficial if you are getting the facility of 1x in any casino, but in gambling, those things happen repeatedly which make a person run towards it again and again. Now these small things are deliberately kept so that it is human nature where all such things will be more and it is beneficial for a person to go more. Now I was seeing a person who said that 1x is allowed in Duelbit, then those who are satisfied with it will definitely be attracted to it, so I look at the new casino tool or am interested in it because such things have been innumerable. Although I do not know any reason for the 0x thing, meaning how much profit will it make if I bet $10, how much profit will I get from it, 1$ or 10$.

[KTChampions]

I’m sure many users here don’t realize that Duelbits has lower wagering requirements compared to other casinos. They probably assume Duelbits has a 1x wagering requirement. Even I, who used to bet on Dota 2 on Duelbits quite often, thought they had the same requirement as other casinos. I only found out today that their wagering requirement is actually very generous. 

You know, after reading this thread and the neighboring one, it’s only just now that I’ve actually noticed the existence of these requirements 
Probably many people, like me, do not pay attention to such things, since it is obvious to them that if they deposit money, they are going to play with it. Overall, I understand that it’s not profitable for services when users employ them as a wallet or mixer rather than for their intended purpose, but is it really such a major issue that they need to introduce such a controversial rule?

[Smartprofit]

To be honest, I've never played at an online casino with a wagering requirement lower than 1x, but since I'm paranoid, I always sense a catch. 🙋

For example, I think (I haven't verified it) that under such conditions, an online casino can impose additional fees on withdrawals. So, it's not that simple...

In general, in my opinion, the 1x wagering requirement was introduced for a reason. As far as I understand, it's a direct FATF requirement. Most of the casinos we're discussing are licensed (most often, a Curacao license). This means they are obligated to comply with FATF requirements.

Why are these requirements in place? To combat money laundering. Online casinos don't want dishonest players turning them into mixers. If that happens, the cryptocurrency online casinos themselves will have serious problems with regulators.🤷

[xenomorfo]

Wow, that's too low. I thought 1x wagering requirement was the standard for all casinos. I never thought there would be a casino that only requires 10%. This is favorable to those players who changed their mind after losing a few bets or those who won a small amount and want to withdraw early. Is the casino not afraid their site will be used for money laundering? Because what is 10%? That's like almost nothing already. Easily reached and could be done in just 1 bet or a few bets more. Obviously, it's also favorable to those who do money laundering.

It's not always that low, let's say that in my opinion it will stay that way to attract a few users and then disappear as a "bonus".
In the end the aim is to attract people by stealing them from other casinos, obviously provided that the casino is valid.

[Ruttoshi]

I am surprised to see that Duelbit casino has just 0.1x wager requirements different from other casinos that has 1x wager requirements. I don't think that we still have more casinos that accepts below 1x  wager requirements.

I was thinking that it's a compulsory wager requirements for all casino and didn't know that the casino are the ones to choose how many times wager requirements they want from customers at first deposit.

[Itz-prisigold]

I'm not even interested if a casino has 0x, 0.1x or 1x, but what is it they are requiring?  Because I believe that two different casinos may both claim 0.1x wager requirement, but end up having different conditions for withdrawals.

Like for example, does the requirement only apply to your original deposits, the overall balance or only certain kinds of deposits? And is there any other requirements or withdrawal fees involved.

When looking at these requirements people should also check out the terms, because the number are not really the most important thing to consider. A lower wagering requirement is good in the beginning, but the same goes to the other conditions attached to withdrawals.

[YOSHIE]

Which other crypto gambling sites do you think have less than 1x wagering requirement?

In my opinion, they are not wrong in assessing conventional and crypto casinos in general, where they often make a minimum turnover rule of 1x, we can understand it, maybe when they try to win at the casino in question by chance the casino enforces a 1x minimum bet rule which makes sense.

But as you said, even though conventional and crypto casinos treat these rules, there are different crypto casinos that do not require a minimum turnover of 1x and no deposit such as Cloudbet, As far as I know, Cloudbet casino users can immediately withdraw funds without the conditions in question.

[Adiljutt156]

I am surprised to see that Duelbit casino has just 0.1x wager requirements different from other casinos that has 1x wager requirements. I don't think that we still have more casinos that accepts below 1x  wager requirements.

I was thinking that it's a compulsory wager requirements for all casino and didn't know that the casino are the ones to choose how many times wager requirements they want from customers at first deposit.

Its also surprised me as well because in long experience on this forum and with multiple casinos I never have anything like this mostly are having 1x wagering because its related to money laundering just because of this no casino is having any compromise on this but they are managing this with effective and many already taking advantage its fantastic to know because now its going to be have more new customers those will be started their journey with them.
It's an important point because I also have in mind it's always compulsory, but now it's showing it all depends on the casino how to do this with this. Now it's really easy to understand a few tactics that are used by casinos for increasing their wagering requirements, but still there are a few flaws in their system that are helping bad people to do their business and stay in touch.

[ZeroVinsonN]

A more user friendly thing to do though would be to reduce it, instead of 1x it can lower, like what Duelbits is doing, sure 10% is something money launderers can manage but it's still a deterrent.

Duelbits is just being far too generous with that. They could simply increase the wagering requirement to 1x, or even something below that, such as 0.8x.

I also wonder how they would defend their position if bad actors were to use the platform for laundering funds, and of course, authorities will eventually can trace the transactions back to them. If that were to happen, the platform would presumably have to explain why such a low or i say, nonexistent wagering requirement was considered sufficient from the perspective of platform that follows aml protocols or whatever you call that.

It doesn't have to be 10% like Duelbits but putting it at 100% isn't entirely fair, I initially had no problem with it, after it I deposited money in a casino I was expecting myself to gamble with all of it, but recently my perspective changed. Something can come up after I've deposited the money that will make me need to withdraw it, I can't do that with the 1x requirement, this could very well leave me stranded. Well, it has it's advantages and disadvantages.

[boyptc]

If not all, then most of them require that much.

And if that's with that casino that only requires 10% of the deposit, that's good. It gives more option for those who like to try it without having the need to think of the wagers.

When looking at these requirements people should also check out the terms, because the number are not really the most important thing to consider. A lower wagering requirement is good in the beginning, but the same goes to the other conditions attached to withdrawals.

There can be some more strict rules to it but, if they're only requiring that little wager compared to the others. This is their way of attracting more users which is a good thing for gamblers.

[Findingnemo]

There are some gambling sites that have less than 1x. Example is Duelbits that it is 0.1x. You can see that under section 5.3 of duelbits terms of service.

I never realized that they had a lower wagering requirement than 1x but I am notn sure this will be applicable on all cases like if someone made a deposit of 1 million and wagered 100K on low odd game and lost around 10K and then proceed to withdraw 990K almost instantly looks sus and they will be surely asked for further verification if they attempt to do that even though they technically completed the requirement to proceed for the withdrawal.

[Nwada001]

Duelbit is among the crypto casinos I have seen this possible, and it’s even after you made mention of it now I went straight back to check their rules. Aside from that, I have seen crypto casinos that even have higher wagers compared to the 1x wager some members are complaining about. It's only on local casinos that I have seen them allow withdrawal without any wager condition, but those are in special cases, and the method of withdrawal must be the same method used in funding the casino, and the details must match.