The 8/10 BC.Game test score and the 6.5/10 Stake test score describe those particular hands-on tests. They shouldn’t be interpreted as saying that BC.Game has a better overall reputation than Stake.
We need to make that distinction much more visible on the test pages. A clear disclaimer is one option, but we also want to separate the hands-on test score from the broader casino rating more clearly in the layout itself.
Otherwise, the numbers can easily send the wrong message when they are viewed without the full context.
The money test should be included in the overall rating of the casino and should not be separated from the score sheet, because, in your own interpretation, it could send the wrong signal.
There are instances when a scam casino will stand out on this, but when it comes to important points, they failed miserably, and your comparison between Stake and BC.Game proved this point.
You should not include a test where there is a possibility for a scam casino to stand out.