* No founder or controller controlling it that will make it to be rear or scors in the market unlike other coin that have CEO's or MD's that control it.
You mean Bitcoin has 'no founder? Then who do you want to give Satoshi Nakamoto credit to? Or are you just tossing his contributions out the window? You are right that Bitcoin is not controlled by anyone and that is because it is decentralized, that was the aim of satoshi, to create a currency that won't be controlled by anyone but can be used as medium of exchange via p2p transaction. Bitcoin is decentralized, it has a limited supply, it uses Proof of Work (PoW), its developer is not known which in my opinion is a great advantage for Bitcoin.
No founder or controller controlling bitcoin means that the founder of bitcoin isn't in control of the coin, context matters when trying to figure out what someone is saying so you don't misunderstand them and end up misquoting them, I'm pointing this out because I hate being misquoted my self because it's not the same thing as correcting me for my mistake.
Basically, bitcoin's entire creation worked in such a way that everyone involved (buyers, sellers, miners, holders etc) were collectively in control of the coin and when everyone is in control of something then no one is and this is why bitcoin has been and will continue to be above other coins out there currently becteven though others have tried to create something like bitcoin they've been to selfish to leave it out of their control.
Context matters, words too matters. The kind of words someone uses to convey their messages can obscure the meaning of what they intend to pass. I understand the feeling when someone misquotes you or misinterprets your intentions, I also don’t like it and that’s why we should do better in conveying our messages clearly.
Bitcoin was designed to be decentralised so everyone who owns it has control over what happens with their portion, there’s no central body in control but it is not without a founder.