Expected na mas malala sa nangyari sa FTX if ever wala niyan. Napaisip tuloy tayo na may kahalagahan rin yung centralization sa ganitong mga seryosong insidente, pero yun nga lang walang guarantee na makukuha pa nila yan unless talagang ibalik or magkaroon ng agreement onchain. Talino din ni CZ to came up with this idea kasi nagrerely lang talaga sila rito sa ganitong mga breaches.
Yep, ito ang pinaka-benefit ng centralization, kontrolado nila ang funds as a whole, not just individual users owning a piece.
As for your question if makukuha pa ng Binance yung ninakaw sa kanila, most probably hindi (if the mangagaling mismo sa hacker), pero there's still a way around that. Tether, yung nag-issue ng USDT, can burn the funds held in the hacker's address- yes, burnnnnn.

Mawawala sa total circulation yung nakaw na funds, and Tether could just easily mint a few billions again to replenish those removed tokens sa total circulation, pupwede nila itong ibigay ulit sa Binance. Sa mismong smart contract ng USDT, andun yung burn function: destroyBlackFunds.

All in all, depende na sa negotiations ng Binance at Tether 'yan.
Source: [
1 ]
As for OP's question,
what if walang SAFU, walang freeze ng stablecoins at tuluyang nawala ang funds ng mga users, do you think magdump ng tuluyan ang Bitcoin?
Anong guess nyo na price na pwedeng abutin ng Bitcoin kung magdump ito starting from $80k?
Yes. Very possible. Market is driven mostly by big news at itong hacking incident ng Binance is the biggest one this year (yet). If hindi agad na-assure ng Binance na kaya nilang i-compensate ang stolen funds, malamang mas bumagsak pa ang BTC price since many more would opt to liquidate their BTC holdings in exchange for safer, less volatile stablecoins. Despite halting withdrawals, marami pa rin ang nag-move from BTC to stablecoins, kaya bumaba ang presyo ng BTC. Maybe they should just have halted trading as well - pero malamang baka mas marami pa ang nagalit since may cons din ito.
