Can a regular player actually win a casino race or is it just for whales?

[Elainebue]

random raffles would be interesting since everyone gets a shot regardless of how much they wager

[famososMuertos]

Almost every operator (maybe even everyone of them) has some kind of race with leaderboard now: weekly, monthly, whatever with '$100k up for grabs'. and in every leaderboard, the top 10 have wagered amounts ... i can't wager in my life.

:://::

This is nothing new; leaderboards have always been a feature of all sorts of games, contests, and the like. I’d say the only thing that has really evolved is the nature of the prizes.

So, it is possible to reach the top spot with a standard deposit budget;it all depends on the specific contest, the type of game, and the time you’re willing to invest.

So, it’s all relative. If you don’t have the capacity to place large bets, then (plain and simple) it’s not for you. Look for leaderboard contests that better suit your situation, focus on growing your bankroll, and wait a couple of years until you’re in a position to wager a sufficient volume. But keep one thing in mind: even for a "whale," securing a top spot is no easy feat; it takes more than just having a massive bankroll.

[Barikui1]

No, a regular gambler with limited funds cannot win a casino race contest because since the winner is mostly determined by who uses more money to gamble, he or she has no chance. If it's something else like raffle or predictions contest, he stands a chance, but a race contest that the outcome is determined by who gamble with more money over a stipulated period of time, the whales or the rich are the ones that will always win such contest because of their higher staking power, and their will to grab the big price.

[Webetcoins]

If a $1 bet could be compared to a $1000 one than how can it be more fair? Let's not forget that the ones wagering bigger amounts are also taking risk and they could also lose some money there.

Winning the bonus by climbing up the leaderboard is not an easy task. To be able to maintain the position on leaderboard, you will have to stay in profits or someone else might take over. At that point, even the bets are bigger and a single win/lose can markdown the position. Casinos want you to deposit more money and these challenges are just an another way of them asking you to deposit more. You don't necessarily have to participate in these challenges.

[viljy]

For the casino, it’s more profitable if the volume of bets is large, so an average gambler with a small bankroll has no chance of beating high rollers in a casino race. The OP formula for competition, which is based on multipliers, won’t bring any benefit to the casino if the bets are from $1. For example, if we consider bets of $1*21 and $20*1.05 to be equivalent, this will most likely only bring the casino a loss of $20. Whereas the traditional version of the race, based on the volume of participants’ bets, allows the casino to cover the costs of prizes for the winners and still make a profit.

[Shinpako09]

I never tried competing for the leaderboards because I know I never stood a chance. So, if you are also not a whale like me, you should know the answer already. That's just some common sense.

Only whales can manage to make such high volume wagers. I don't think a normal player can also manage to produce the same wager as those whales. They have bigger bankrolls, obviously they will also have a higher wager. It's a game of money. If you are just a normal player, just focus on winning instead of competing for the leaderboards where you don't stand a chance of getting in.

[Africolo]

Almost every operator (maybe even everyone of them) has some kind of race with leaderboard now: weekly, monthly, whatever with '$100k up for grabs'. and in every leaderboard, the top 10 have wagered amounts ... i can't wager in my life.

Whats even the point for regular players?

Most races are based on total wagering volume. which basically means whoever has the biggest bankroll gets the best chance at winning. and if you wanna climb higher you gotta keep betting more and more...

Personally i'd rather see a leaderboard based on the highest multiplier or something where a $1 bet could actually compete with a $1000 one.

And what do you think is more fair - wager-based leaderboards, random raffles or highest multiplier races?

I don't see any need for comparison when it comes to gambling because our luck differs and those that play regularly or regular players can actually win casinos race  which is not just for whales alone, a regular players who don't have a reasonable amount of money or who's on a smaller bankroll Management can't stake on a casino race, so he will have to stick to his normal bettings than use all the little amount he has to play on a casino race, if any player does that then I think the person is not prudent enough in the gambling system because you stake with what you have and not compete with those the have the money to stake high on casino race.

We all understand that those with little amount can't win a casino race as it's those that has a more huge amount of funds that are considered so the regular players don't have a chance to win a casino race due to the money involved in it. I better stick to what I can afford that's one of my principles in gambling.

[Outhue]

Big disadvantage on this one, I would rather use my money to place bet on a soccer game than a casino race, ther are many examples of people who want to get to the top of the leaderboard and they failed miserably, I don't know why people takes big risks like this, there are other things you can risk your money on than this, even trading with the right tools gives you an advantage over chasing the impossible, be responsible with your money.

[BigTarget]

Almost every operator (maybe even everyone of them) has some kind of race with leaderboard now: weekly, monthly, whatever with '$100k up for grabs'. and in every leaderboard, the top 10 have wagered amounts ... i can't wager in my life.

:://::

This is nothing new; leaderboards have always been a feature of all sorts of games, contests, and the like. I’d say the only thing that has really evolved is the nature of the prizes.

So, it is possible to reach the top spot with a standard deposit budget;it all depends on the specific contest, the type of game, and the time you’re willing to invest.

So, it’s all relative. If you don’t have the capacity to place large bets, then (plain and simple) it’s not for you. Look for leaderboard contests that better suit your situation, focus on growing your bankroll, and wait a couple of years until you’re in a position to wager a sufficient volume. But keep one thing in mind: even for a "whale," securing a top spot is no easy feat; it takes more than just having a massive bankroll.

In almost every competition, bankroll will play an important role. With a small account, you can hardly think of entering these competitions because no matter how long your winning streak is, the profits will still be pretty low as compared to other accounts. Casinos is not just going to reward you because you are able to maintain the winning streak but if you are able to fund your account. There are a few contests where winning streak is counted as a winner so maybe OP can dig into that.

I think even with a $100 account, it will take months to reach that mark where we can join any of these contests to actually win the prize there. The $100 amount is never going to be stable as there will be profit and loss.

[tbterryboy]

There's no point competing about almost everything not to talk of gambling. Allowing your self to having that feeling of trying to levelup/competition like other in the gambling world will likely trigger addiction or give room for addiction and we all know the effects of gambling addiction. Gamble as much as you can afford to lose, gamble according to your present ability, don't force yourself to gamble more than usual, if there's anything like over discretionary funds (funds that's over discretionary), that's what should be used in gambling not putting yourself into competition.

Gambling in itself is addictive and competitions like the one mentioned by OP will only increase our screen time. I have being a part of few of these competitions in the past and I have to say that the number of hours spent on gambling almost doubled for me.

I was constantly wagering on multiple games and sports but was also spending that research time so was able to remain in profits. I also was the runner-up in that competition and won a share of prize but later I started wondering, was it worth my time? I tried and avoided any such competition from that moment and never exceed the given hours for gambling per week. I prefer to gamble limited in order to safeguard my profits.

[eisen33]

Almost every operator (maybe even everyone of them) has some kind of race with leaderboard now: weekly, monthly, whatever with '$100k up for grabs'. and in every leaderboard, the top 10 have wagered amounts ... i can't wager in my life.

Whats even the point for regular players?

Most races are based on total wagering volume. which basically means whoever has the biggest bankroll gets the best chance at winning. and if you wanna climb higher you gotta keep betting more and more...

Personally i'd rather see a leaderboard based on the highest multiplier or something where a $1 bet could actually compete with a $1000 one.

And what do you think is more fair - wager-based leaderboards, random raffles or highest multiplier races?

These rankings show players with the largest betting volumes, and it follows logically that to be among the leaders, you need to place as many bets as possible with a large bet amount. But I've always been skeptical of such rankings because I don't know how confident I can be that they're genuine, and they don't include accounts that may belong to the casinos themselves, designed to encourage players to bet more frequently and in larger amounts.

[Yamifoud]

Whether we like it or not, this is really what was meant to be. Gambling isn't unfair when it comes to winning races. Because gambling is not just about strategy, but it is the capital that matters most.

If I can only gamble $100 per day, I don't compare and think that I will lead the competition and surpass those who bet $1000 per day. It is not because we don't have the right, but it is crystal clear already that we can't beat them.

If we want to have a peaceful gambling life, don't compare ourselves to others.

[Somegory]

Almost every operator (maybe even everyone of them) has some kind of race with leaderboard now: weekly, monthly, whatever with '$100k up for grabs'. and in every leaderboard, the top 10 have wagered amounts ... i can't wager in my life.

Whats even the point for regular players?

Most races are based on total wagering volume. which basically means whoever has the biggest bankroll gets the best chance at winning. and if you wanna climb higher you gotta keep betting more and more...

Personally i'd rather see a leaderboard based on the highest multiplier or something where a $1 bet could actually compete with a $1000 one.

And what do you think is more fair - wager-based leaderboards, random raffles or highest multiplier races?

Correct me if I am wrong, this has nothing to do with the real gambling, this race thing sounds like a contest aside from the casino itself, when it comes to leaderboard the person with the most wager will likely wins.

It's a battle of who can spend the most amount of money, and this is what makes it crazier, I remember that some online exchanges also do something like this once in a while where people will chase the leaderboard by providing the highest volume on the exchange.

People do make money this way but if someone else wagers higher amount of money than you it means you will earn less amount compare to them, and some even have levels to their contest like paying only the top 10.

[Out of mind]

In betting races, ordinary players never get big prizes and I don't think they should. We see this a lot, those who bet a lot and are at the top of the leader board can almost bet a lot of money to be in the top 10. But you and I can never bet that much money and be at the top of the leader board, it can never be expected from ordinary players. In most races, the winner is the one who has bet the most and has the most money. There are big players who have a lot of money and compete to keep themselves at the top and win prizes. But it is never possible for an ordinary player to get to those top positions, it is almost impossible to get to that position with such a lot of money, so ordinary players do not get such prizes at all. But I think it is fair that random raffle is good for small players.

[ZeroVinsonN]

Most casino races measure wagered amount so the whales have upper hands to win the prize. Ordinary player can still win prize in such contest but that should depend on how many whales are involved and should not also be the main prize of the tournament. There are some tournaments that have prizes for many people including up to 50th position, such large number should be room for ordinary players to get their hands on some of the prizes.

There could be room for ordinary players, except for when there are over 50 whales in the contest and they are all aiming for top spot, at that point regularly players don't stand much of a chance. Just look for contests or races that don't measure wagered amount though I wouldn't be able to provide examples since I'm not onto them.

Correct me if I am wrong, this has nothing to do with the real gambling, this race thing sounds like a contest aside from the casino itself, when it comes to leaderboard the person with the most wager will likely wins.

It's rules are different from regular gambling but it still works as a bet where the winning prize goes to the highest bidder and a few of the people behind them, if you don't have the money to spend then it's best to avoid these contests.

[henmark]

No, a regular gambler with limited funds cannot win a casino race contest because since the winner is mostly determined by who uses more money to gamble, he or she has no chance. If it's something else like raffle or predictions contest, he stands a chance, but a race contest that the outcome is determined by who gamble with more money over a stipulated period of time, the whales or the rich are the ones that will always win such contest because of their higher staking power, and their will to grab the big price.

I do not think that it is whether regular player or whales who are winning the tournaments of casinos but it must be inside people. Because, only if you are confident about not losing anything, you may bet even with very small odds. I have participated in many races but on the final day of race, some people do come and bet in very big amount and simply winning the race in the end.

Have you ever seen that any of our reputed forum member winning a race? Those Lambo (I do not want to name that scam gambling house cum faucet) were won by some unknown users who name frequently appeared on weekly wagering contest and nothing more. Casino races are just marketing ploy, we cannot even imagine about winning there.

[rbynxx]

And what do you think is more fair - wager-based leaderboards, random raffles or highest multiplier races?

It's a cash grab and it only favors to who got a huge bankroll to be honest. Yeah could be good if what you wager is winning more than losing but no, it's kind of a trap to me. I'd rather join with just few things to consider to win something, something like a contest that doesn't have to be so hassle. For me, raffles are good but I'd check it first if at what cost could mean before you are eligible.

[bitbollo]

Of course a normal user can't expect to get any advantage from this kind of competition, just to mention some leadobards, it's evident that first places are not competing for this prize but they are gambling by themself.  Excluding of course the fake tournament that have polluted scam accusation section in the last weeks... in that case you can't even get a single spot for prize.
My suggestion would be very easy= there isn't any real advantage to reach such bonuses, don't change or adapt your gamestyle.  Mostly are designed for seeing players playing more... hence losing more!

[TopTort777]

This is gambling. Any bet has chances to win a jackpot. All those "casinos races" are for those who can afford to lose, patience and finding a way to wager as quick as possible (not as much as possible). Whale with a lot of money most likely will lose a lot to be on first place, will grab main prize that wont satisfy him as it hardly will cover losses. Imho all those races is to find way to gamble in multiple windows, not get caught and prove innocence later.

[Smartprofit]

Almost every operator (maybe even everyone of them) has some kind of race with leaderboard now: weekly, monthly, whatever with '$100k up for grabs'. and in every leaderboard, the top 10 have wagered amounts ... i can't wager in my life.

Whats even the point for regular players?

Most races are based on total wagering volume. which basically means whoever has the biggest bankroll gets the best chance at winning. and if you wanna climb higher you gotta keep betting more and more...

Personally i'd rather see a leaderboard based on the highest multiplier or something where a $1 bet could actually compete with a $1000 one.

And what do you think is more fair - wager-based leaderboards, random raffles or highest multiplier races?

Essentially, you've answered your own question... For the average player, such a competition is pointless. Moreover, if the average player participates in such a competition, they are practically guaranteed to lose (there's a catch). 🙋

But for online casinos, leaderboard races make a lot of sense! The casino's profit increases with the size and number of players' bets. For a wealthy player accustomed to placing large bets, participating in such competitions can also be profitable. Wealthy players may have casino bonuses that give them an advantage in the game. But the average player doesn't have such bonuses! They might not even know about them. For them, it's a completely different universe.

In my opinion, the average player puts themselves at great risk by trying to participate in such a race. It turns out that they're no longer playing to win at slots, roulette, or poker, but to win the leaderboard (which is probably completely impossible for them).

I think it's important to always remember that in gambling, the house always has the advantage. The more often you play and the higher your bets, the greater your losses. And in this particular situation, you're also trying to play two games at once (it's like trying to sit on two chairs at once).🧖