he said that bookies always pay some sports league to get early information about different team and that some media also pays the league to get earl y information that they sell to some bettors and that there are some information that a team could sell to the bookies and media but will not make it public and the bookies are using it as an edge to make better prediction than an average bettors.
So if sportbooks are paying so called leagues to get early information about teams, how does it translate to you not been favorable while gambling. Except this person is arguring about sportbooks paying these leagues so that they can , tell the the outcome of the planned result which the clubs will arrange and play among themselves. Which to me is match fixing which is a serious offence , if that is the what is withheld from the public.
If not I don't see the wisdom behind the Argument, wining in gambling has always been a game of luck, and has nothing to do with information that is bought somewhere. The day you win the Casinos are not buying information from leagues, while the day you lose you become angry and comes up with all manner of allegations which doesn't sound right to me.
DiMarxist it possible to effect bettors bet outcome if the leagues are fixed and casinos being the one paying for that match fixing, this have being happening in so cases and that is why some match get call out in the last FIFA world cup, so you don't know the extent big players in the game can go to get things done in way that keeps them at profits.
In some ways, is possible to get the outcome of the match even before the match begins, and at this po,int the match officials will all be in collaboration with the plot to rig the game in favour of the selected team.