Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2026, 03:09:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 32.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What would the process be if....  (Read 33 times)
MikeJ_NpC (OP)
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 137
Merit: 10

if you want to lie *cough*use your data; not mine.


View Profile
November 10, 2026, 05:38:30 PM
 #1

If "someone" has a way to ... well call it circumvent edclp...   i phrase it that way so it doesnt elude to anything.


IF someone had a proven method for this... aside form ARIX publication, what other things need to be done?
there is no bounty or program from what i see..... and there really seems to be nothing outlining the process... since everyone concurs its impossible...... umm yeah sure.

ive had it for months.. clearly im not doing anything with it ... and desptie repeated requests privately,... its falling on deaf ears....  good plan.
granted i havent looked around too much but the topic is taboo and ppl like to stick their heads in the sand...   good work...


so what if , who knows , maybe.... you can decide for yourself but i dont ask for no reason.
regards.

oh and with my method quantum doesnt help. but what do i know... Smiley  im just not a theift..
only time i will ever mention this ... but i want the process not the outcome...


i admit nothing nor imply anything either way... its all in conjecture as it hasnt been approved by the pundits that be.

If Karma is a bitch, then god is a woman. I ask to know, not to be screwed or hear trite excuses (after the fact) which a 3rd grader could do better on. If you give your word, keep it atleast..
alegotardo
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1816


☢️ alegotardo™


View Profile WWW
November 10, 2026, 11:35:15 PM
 #2

Sorry, I am still unsure whether you actually found a vulnerability and just do not know how to disclose it safely, whether you are simply trying to get some expert interested to validate something that you do not even know for sure works or not, or whether you are completely bluffing.

I do not want to assume anything, but the way you presented it makes it difficult to know what to think or believe.
I think here is a good place to you start to providing more details... I am not saying you need to reveal sensitive details or compromise your potential discovery, but there are a big difference between claiming you've found something and presenting evidence of what you are assuming in order to demonstrate that your "theory" actually work.

If what you have is real and critical, I am sure the community will point you in the right direction.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!