TECHNOBIT support tread + customer feedback

[lenny_]

I've just checked it on Opera browser, I typed https://technobit.eu/ and opened page:



It's sure in https, because when I type just "technobit.eu" and open it, it displays:

[1713621859]

1713621859

[1713621859]

1713621859

[lenny_]

Hey,
Are you sure your PC date is ok?

Yes, it's OK. Please check Opera browser result post above.
Looks like something is wrong with their certificate from GeoTrust Inc. All other webpages in https:// mode on my PC are working fine, including BitcoinTalk for example.

Can you guys post your results from your browsers?

EDIT:
Look at this - Qualys SSL Labs check showing "Grade F", test failed for this website.
Results:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=technobit.eu&s=5.104.170.146
And some clues:
" This server supports anonymous (insecure) suites (see below for details). Grade set to F.
The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers.  MORE INFO » "

[loshia]

Hey,
Are you sure your PC date is ok?

Yes, it's OK. Please check Opera browser result post above.
Looks like something is wrong with their certificate from GeoTrust Inc. All other webpages in https:// mode on my PC are working fine, including BitcoinTalk for example.

Can you guys post your results from your browsers?

EDIT:
Look at this - Qualys SSL Labs check showing "Grade F", test failed for this website.
Results:
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=technobit.eu&s=5.104.170.146
And some clues:
" This server supports anonymous (insecure) suites (see below for details). Grade set to F.
The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers.  MORE INFO » "

So I guess some pics are hosted so where else without https. That is why your browser is complaining.  And what is the problem with that?

[Cortex7]

@lenny:

No problems really.

This server supports anonymous (insecure) suites (see below for details). Grade set to F.

as @loshia says, martos website is hosting some images with non HTTPS url. To fix this he would have to copy and host them on his own server. But it's not necessary to fix (in my mind)

The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers.  MORE INFO »

Many sites do not use perfect forward secrecy (PFS).

PFS means each connection uses a securely generated, separate new encryption key, so that recordings of the connection traffic cannot be decyphered in the future when the server certificate is acquired by an attacker.

This does not mean the server has broken SSL, but it means it is more brittle. If an attacker can read memory containing one time key he can decode all intercepted wire traffic in future, until PFS is enabled.

Simple fix for @Marto to implement:
https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2013/08/05/configuring-apache-nginx-and-openssl-for-forward-secrecy

[lenny_]

That's talking!   Thanks, Cortex7. Hopefully marto74 will find time to fix this  
I'm not feeling comfortable seeing errors such as this, who else knows what is f**ked overthere and what forms are sent without https. Better just to have it done - right.

[marto74]

I'll check the outside images and links

[TeQ99]

I'll check the outside images and links

Marto, Please check you email regarding the rma return i got. 1 miner is working the other one not. i have been mailing you for the last week.

No response from you.

[CH]

To make it short: Not answering PM and mails. Not taking care of existing customers with problems in a timely manner. I was told on 29.08.14 my problem would be taken care of within 2 hours. Still nothing. And this isn't the first time this happens. I will post updates here from now on if something good or bad happens.

[CH]

Update. Since yesterday ( short time after my post ) my miners are running at an 24h average speed of about 2,3 TH/s again ( I have ten 240 GH/s miners ). This is acceptable.

[sorehammer]

Well I have had my HEX4M 3 weeks now running 504hrs non stop with out a missed beat

[CH]

I forgot to mention. My miners are hosted by Technobit.

[TeQ99]

I'll check the outside images and links

Marto, Please check you email regarding the rma return i got. 1 miner is working the other one not. i have been mailing you for the last week.

A week further no response from Technobit.. martin/Marto is hiding?



No response from you.

[WiWi]

@Zich

Do you know how to disable chip 0 and chip1 for a hex4m?
Those two chips are not working right due to mailfunction in controllerchips.
Marto said number 7 or 14 instead of 255, but only with 14 i can disable chip0 not chip1.
How to calculate this?

Hope u know

[Zich]

@Zich

Do you know how to disable chip 0 and chip1 for a hex4m?
Those two chips are not working right due to mailfunction in controllerchips.
Marto said number 7 or 14 instead of 255, but only with 14 i can disable chip0 not chip1.
How to calculate this?

Hope u know

The setting use binary numbering.
1 represent enable
0 represent disable

Example:

Chips numbering   ==> 7654 3210       Decimal
all chips enable    ==> 0000 1111         15  

all chips disable   ==> 0000 0000          0    

chip 3 disable      ==> 0000 0111         7    

chip 2 disable      ==> 0000 1011         11  

chip 1 disable      ==> 0000 1101         13  

chip 0 disable      ==> 0000 1110         14  

chip 0 & 1 disable ==> 0000 1100         12


For complete chart : Binary Chart

[WiWi]

Hi Zich,

ok, thanks. I know binary chart, its part of my job to know it
Its very clear for me, thx.

edit: i tried: chip 0 and 1 are disabled now, thx

[Zich]

Hi Zich,

ok, thanks. I know binary chart, its part of my job to know it
Its very clear for me, thx.

edit: i tried: chip 0 and 1 are disabled now, thx

Great 

[Airwhale]

When buying usb hubs for the minion boards, is their any reason to get USB 3.0 or will USB 2.0 do just fine? Planning on having them go in a TP-link type setup.

[WiWi]

i dont know what others are using, but i am using a usb 3.0 hub with 12 V power supply. It works fine for me.
I used a usb 2.0 hub b4 this one and had lots of problems, but of course thats in my case.
With this hub its stable

[Cortex7]

When buying usb hubs for the minion boards, is their any reason to get USB 3.0 or will USB 2.0 do just fine? Planning on having them go in a TP-link type setup.

The receiving interface is USB2 from what I remember reading, some people reported probs with USB3, i read it in the TPLink setup/guide thread, link to it is available in this thread i think

Having said that @wiwi reported USB3 was good for him, so obviously not all USB3 is bad, luck of the draw I suppose.

You should also try and get a hub that will accept DC12V power supply, and power it from one of the boards PSUs (less power use and less power issues like ripple and groudloop).

Same goes for TPLink, cut it's power cable and wire to a board PSUs +5V line if you can.

[ZBC3]

Martin,

I hope that Rocker chip miner is getting close to production.

How are the Hex16E4 's looking? Have you fixed the small problem and started shipping yet?