Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 03:23:01 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: del  (Read 2931 times)
myself
Guest

del
January 10, 2012, 07:45:00 AM
Last edit: September 09, 2012, 08:21:37 PM by myself
 #1

del
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
GeniuSxBoY
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 07:49:45 AM
 #2

I don't mind that the amount is valid for a trade, but I do mind that robots (superhuman) can manage 1 x 10^8 trades at .01.


In other words, there needs to be a limit to the number of bids that exceeds the threshold of human bidding but minimizes the amount of bids that can be placed by a bot.


I'm thinking that number x should = 35.

Be humble!
Crypt_Current
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Shame on everything; regret nothing.


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 09:06:50 AM
Last edit: January 10, 2012, 09:30:59 AM by Crypt_Current
 #3

I don't mind that the amount is valid for a trade, but I do mind that robots (superhuman) can manage 1 x 10^8 trades at .01.


In other words, there needs to be a limit to the number of bids that exceeds the threshold of human bidding but minimizes the amount of bids that can be placed by a bot.


I'm thinking that number x should = 35.

That's a bad idea.
Trade bots are not "superhuman" -- they are different than human.  Some things, a trade bot does better than a human.  Most things, humans do better.
One of the things trade bots are better at is placing orders quickly and anytime (when they're running -- no sleep necessary like humans), according to some rules / variables.
The speed at which the trade bot can do this is limited by the exchange's API.  This is not some arbitrary figure like you are suggesting.

Actually, the figure you are suggesting may not be completely arbitrary, but it is much more difficult to objectively measure, and (I would imagine it would be ) much MUCH more difficult to overcome and resolve.

10% off at CampBX for LIFE:  https://campbx.com/main.php?r=C9a5izBQ5vq  ----  Authorized BitVoucher MEGA reseller (& BTC donations appreciated):  https://bitvoucher.co/affl/1HkvK8o8WWDpCTSQGnek7DH9gT1LWeV5s3/
LTC:  LRL6vb6XBRrEEifB73DiEiYZ9vbRy99H41  NMC:  NGb2spdTGpWj8THCPyCainaXenwDhAW1ZT
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 09:08:06 AM
 #4

You guys are just jealous you don't have the resources to run a bot to buy bitcents all day.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
Vandroiy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1002


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 11:44:43 AM
 #5

It's spamming the histories.

Just round the fees up to some minimum value and prevent super-small trades.

I don't know about you, but I'm not so happy with hundreds of pages of trading history. Manual processing is impossible, and even automated can become a hassle if someone does DoS on this.
Jonathan Ryan Owens
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 252



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2012, 11:49:25 AM
 #6

I agree that 0.01 is too small of a tick. I'm not sure what the tick size should be, but I'm going to guess 0.05.

Cluster2k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1692
Merit: 1018



View Profile
January 10, 2012, 11:50:55 AM
 #7

How many transactions can one have open?  I've only had a hundred at a time at most, as it takes a few seconds to place each order through PHP.  Snooze. 
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 11:54:23 AM
 #8

I agree that 0.01 is too small of a tick. I'm not sure what the tick size should be, but I'm going to guess 0.05.

Somebody's listening.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
January 10, 2012, 09:36:05 PM
 #9

i like the guy with the 0.0123 bot
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 09:37:30 PM
 #10

i like the guy with the 0.0123 bot

Haters gonna hate.  Apparently even bitcoiners hate free markets.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
SgtSpike
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005



View Profile
January 10, 2012, 09:39:22 PM
 #11

Someone should mix it up a bit and go with 0.0124.
GeniuSxBoY
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 06:29:29 AM
 #12

Better yet, 3210.0! 
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻


I wish I were creative enough to draw




with special characters Angry

Be humble!
str4wm4n
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1611
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 09:04:30 AM
 #13

Better yet, 3210.0!
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻

┬──┬ ノ( ゜-゜ノ)

that's better...no need for violence now :]
Cluster2k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1692
Merit: 1018



View Profile
January 11, 2012, 09:28:50 AM
 #14

The 0.0123 btc trader makes for some pretty graphs.  He grappled with my bid and took dozens of bites out of it.  Maybe the bot owner's goal is to generate thousands of trades, pulling the bids and asks into a tighter spread and then attacking the dumb market by suddenly buying or selling thousands of bitcoins.  It appears to be working again.  I predict another wild swing in the next few hours.

bittenbob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 01:23:29 PM
 #15

I think the 0.123 is someone trying to initiate rallys and selloffs by pushing a bot to its action point hoping for a domino effect. It seems to be working too.
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 05:49:02 PM
 #16

3 0.01 transaction per second this is interesting

It's not consistent though.... Still, bot is very hungry.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
codymanix
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 121

Gir: I'm gonna sing the Doom Song now..


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 09:13:23 PM
 #17

If there would be a limit of transactions per account per second, people would start writing bots which are operating in multiple accounts simultanously.

As long as MtGox is able to handle such amounts, so be it..

Programming tutorials, Tools, Games & Humor http://deutronium.de.vu
My Vircurex referral code for persistant 0.05% trade discount: 750-33267 or use
https://vircurex.com/welcome/index?referral_id=750-33267
mobodick
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 11, 2012, 09:51:04 PM
 #18

Better yet, 3210.0!
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
Bots

Y U no trade 0.067. Or 7.513. Or 15.
ultima
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 96
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 13, 2012, 12:32:23 AM
 #19

Just set a minimum fee, like every stock exchange in the world. So you can do very small trades but it will cost you.
SkRRJyTC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 13, 2012, 01:03:34 AM
 #20

Just set a minimum fee, like every stock exchange in the world. So you can do very small trades but it will cost you.

... is this really an insurmountable problem? Mtgox just needs to fix their shit to allow this kind of trading times 1000.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!