Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2022, 07:53:55 PM *
News: Bitcointalk Community Awards
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why isnt Bitcoin a PGP network like Bitmessage?  (Read 723 times)
adpinbr (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 780
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 21, 2014, 09:59:45 PM
 #1

If people are willing to pay the miners fee, they should be able to send an encrypted message via the blockchain.

Typical use case: I advertise a pair of Alpaca socks on facebook for 5 mBTC by posting a picture of those socks and adding my Public Key.
The client can now use the Bitcoin network to transmit money, but how does he transmit his shipping info? He could use Facebook (or the medium that the merchant advertises his product on) but that would require that service to support this function and be able to track that data, furthermore those backends are not interchangeable, reducing the purchase experience (I frequently see a product I ike on a website and buy it off amazon for just cause they have my payment and shipping info). I propose that we allow the customer to send the merchant his shipping info via the blockchain in an encrypted manner
1670356435
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1670356435

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1670356435
Reply with quote  #2

1670356435
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1007

Reverse engineer from time to time


View Profile
April 21, 2014, 10:00:48 PM
 #2

If people are willing to pay the miners fee, they should be able to send an encrypted message via the blockchain.

Typical use case: I advertise a pair of Alpaca socks on facebook for 5 mBTC by posting a picture of those socks and adding my Public Key.
The client can now use the Bitcoin network to transmit money, but how does he transmit his shipping info? He could use Facebook (or the medium that the merchant advertises his product on) but that would require that service to support this function and be able to track that data, furthermore those backends are not interchangeable, reducing the purchase experience (I frequently see a product I ike on a website and buy it off amazon for just cause they have my payment and shipping info). I propose that we allow the customer to send the merchant his shipping info via the blockchain in an encrypted manner
And now you introduced more bloat into the blockchain, good job.

BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
franky1
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 3098



View Profile
April 21, 2014, 10:12:19 PM
 #3

And now you introduced more bloat into the blockchain, good job.

more bloat??

im sorry to inform you but blocks are not bloated, they are on average only filled 20% of the 1mb limit

imagine it this way, since the blocks were upgraded from 500mb for 4 years and then and then 1mb for a year means

26gbx4= 104gb
52gbx1=52gb
=156gb potential data that could have been filled over the last 5 years. yet currently my block folder (fully synced) sits at under 20gb

meaning there is no bloat at all

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
April 21, 2014, 10:30:30 PM
 #4

It isn't because it was never coded to be, I'm guessing.

You could still embed a PGP message in a transaction and if the other party has the key, they could read it, right?

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!