[ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65%

[he-man]

how much hash are you solo mining with.

[1713961075]

1713961075

[utahjohn]

how much hash are you solo mining with.

Devoting about 12.7Mhs with a single 7950 and finding 2-3 blocks per day.
I'd rather be just buying right now but I find Cryptsy too risky... (LOL they've become too big for their britches and can't seem to handle support tickets in a timely manner).

[danbi]

Hmm, isn't Danbis Pool at 0% fee?
And Minepit has payouts after every 1 DMD confirmed, not every minute.

Maybe it's time to clean up among the pool links on bit.diamonds, just as it has been done here in this thread. Links to Omargpools, Cryptofrenzy and Noncepool are still there, but Minepit is missing. But I guess that you're already aware of this since you changed it in this thread.

Yes it does not much good for Diamond's appearance if incorrect info is on website and cryptsy info page ...
Numerous spelling errors also need to be corrected on website if we are to be a professional coin

According to Minepit Ann on this forum, one minute payouts are a fact.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.msg7398690;topicseen#msg7398690
I was not aware of the changes and would like to have this confirmed by the pool op.

Danbi's pool is still set to 0% but the info on the OP is so to speak ahead of the change. We need more mining pools and undercutting everyone with zero fee is not good strategy in the long run. Danbi still needs to agree to this change and I'm hoping he will

I have made changes to the website (update on pools) but apparently haven't pushed it. That's what happens when you work on too many things at the same time thanks for bringing it up. As for spelling mistakes.. ehh the website is still work in progress, patience.

Why is it I learn these things last?

danbi's pool(s) are not only all running at 0% fees, but also (all) run payouts every minute. Always have. And do other good things.

popshot, I have no issues with you guys trying to convince me. Just bear in mind pointing a gun my way is an once in a lifetime pleasure

Anyway, back to the topic. People, please get your coins off the pool. I understand the way of thinking "someone (danbi!) is taking care of this stuff it might be more secure than the wallet on my own Windows computer (you are unfortunately right here), so why not just keep the coins there." --- but please bear in mind you are causing me great discomfort, having to keep a personal DMD balance in excess of the coins left at the pool (just in case something bad happens), and all this software is buggy enough.

Also, by putting the coins in your own wallet, even if you don't keep it open all the time, you earn PoS. Now, PoS is 50%, it will only reduce in future. Not convinced yet?

Hm... maybe, start minting your coins left at the pool? Is this enough initiative to move them away? :-)

My next initiative will be reverse interest! Please, save me from coding this stuff...

[danbi]

Hey guys, should we try to spread the hashing a bit?

Don't know what the pool hashrate distribution is, went back to Solo mining as I found the frequent "Dings" on Danbi's pool too annoying ...

Could this be an Windows thing? All my miners are headless ...

[utahjohn]

Hey guys, should we try to spread the hashing a bit?

Don't know what the pool hashrate distribution is, went back to Solo mining as I found the frequent "Dings" on Danbi's pool too annoying ...

Could this be an Windows thing? All my miners are headless ...

Only happens when I am monitoring the dashboard page of pool, goes away when I close it but I like to monitor stats
Edit: I'm not even mining with this box as I use it for my home entertainment system and mining interferes with movie watching at 1080p playing mkv's ...

[he-man]

how much hash are you solo mining with.

Devoting about 12.7Mhs with a single 7950 and finding 2-3 blocks per day.
I'd rather be just buying right now but I find Cryptsy too risky... (LOL they've become too big for their britches and can't seem to handle support tickets in a timely manner).

Nice, I'm gonna try to solo mine with my 4 750Ti

[utahjohn]

how much hash are you solo mining with.

Devoting about 12.7Mhs with a single 7950 and finding 2-3 blocks per day.
I'd rather be just buying right now but I find Cryptsy too risky... (LOL they've become too big for their britches and can't seem to handle support tickets in a timely manner).

Nice, I'm gonna try to solo mine with my 4 750Ti

I don't know why yet but my 280x does not like groestl as well as the 7950 ...
Curiously 280x loves X11,X13 and does better than 7950 on those algos.

[danbi]

how much hash are you solo mining with.

Devoting about 12.7Mhs with a single 7950 and finding 2-3 blocks per day.
I'd rather be just buying right now but I find Cryptsy too risky... (LOL they've become too big for their britches and can't seem to handle support tickets in a timely manner).

Nice, I'm gonna try to solo mine with my 4 750Ti

I don't know why yet but my 280x does not like groestl as well as the 7950 ...
Curiously 280x loves X11,X13 and does better than 7950 on those algos.

Maybe you are hitting to too hard? I found out AMD cards prefer much lower clocks for Groestl than for scrypt. What settings do you use?

[utahjohn]

clocking 280x at 1080/1500 and 7950 at 1100/1250.

[danbi]

paper wallet looks good! :-)
on a side note, the new wallet uses more cpu than the previous one.
maybe it's because of the new indexing, danbi probably knows...

Yes, the new indexing could be part of the culprit, as it has an additional cache layer  -- but one would expect it to use less CPU, as it actually prevents the hash being calculated again. Except if the hash comparison is slower than the hash computation... interesting idea, haven't checked it though.

But, the most likely culprit is the additional code in the hashing function I added to get rid of the orphan block that exists at algorithm switch time. There are two hashes for supposedly the same block, which is creating some strange situations. Hopefully, we can get rid of it in a release or two and that code will go away. In any case, it only does one hash comparison, when asked for the hash, so should not be even noticeable.

Another culprit might be coin control. Do you have that enabled?

[pallas]

paper wallet looks good! :-)
on a side note, the new wallet uses more cpu than the previous one.
maybe it's because of the new indexing, danbi probably knows...

Another culprit might be coin control. Do you have that enabled?

It should be disabled, however I don't know a way to check it on a headless client.
An additional information which may be useful is that the load on the CPU is almost constant and about 30% higher with the new wallet.

[pokeytex]

Woo Hoo!  I got my DMD's in my wallet today!  It took a couple phone calls to them but they finally pulled through.  Once I had them on the phone they quickly figured out what happened.  I am a happy camper again!  I am going to test some more small purchases on Cryptsy and send to my wallet to see how it goes.  I did inform the gentleman I spoke with that we are now on 2.0.3.  He was not aware of the new wallet.

Pokeytex

[cryptonit]

Vote for Diamond DMD on

click pic or this link https://www.mintpal.com/voting#DMD

dont spend BTC for voting! (better spend btc to buy more dmd   )
create a mintpal account deposite some little btc amount buy some other coins
(or deposit and sell some other coins which are traded at mintpal)
after that u able to vote each hour for free
once u did one trade on mintpal u allowed to vote each hour without need to pay


place #146 now

i set a bounty from my own wallet (not foundation)

paying 1 DMD to everyone who reached a new rank

so first one reporting #145 and walletaddress
@ http://bit.diamonds/community/index.php/topic,16.0.html
gets 1 DMD by me (or alex if he faster and ninja rewarding again)

IMPORTANT only claim rewards on
http://bit.diamonds/community/index.php/topic,16.0.html

[cryptonit]

Our wallet is offline while we update to the latest version.
It should be back online soon.

seen at cryptsy seems they care and update to 2.0.3 now
without us even asking them (because not mandatory)

[danbi]

paper wallet looks good! :-)
on a side note, the new wallet uses more cpu than the previous one.
maybe it's because of the new indexing, danbi probably knows...

Another culprit might be coin control. Do you have that enabled?

It should be disabled, however I don't know a way to check it on a headless client.
An additional information which may be useful is that the load on the CPU is almost constant and about 30% higher with the new wallet.

30% is way too much. Haven't noticed such behavior myself..
There is no way to enable, or use coin control in the headless client at the moment. This is one deficiency of the current implementation.

However, higher CPU utilization might be because you have more coins eligible for stake. What happens if you disable PoS?

[cryptonit]

Comments: hi coinwarez team

please forwward to ur technical staff regarding default hashrate values

thx for effort try adapt default mining watt/khash ratings based on 1000$ hardware

but i have to say u made errors with groestl

all my righs have a much better  groestl vs x11 x13  rating than ur default ratting suggest

your numbers:
x11 9000 x13 6500 groestl 11000 is normalized to factor 1.38 vs 1 vs 1.69
real life rig 3x amd 290
x11 14500 x13 9800 groestl 45000 is normalized to factor 1.47 vs 1 vs 4.5

im not sure where ur error is coming from i guess u dont used up to date mining software and gpu driver

groestl need amd catalyst 14.6 and a miner like this here
http://sourceforge.net/projects/diamonddmd/files/sgminer_diamond_v4.1.0.zip/download
to reach 15 mhash each amd290
example bat
sgminer.exe -k diamond -o localhost:17772 -u rpcuserXXXXX -p rpcpassXXXXXXXXX -o stratum+tcp://dmdpool.digsys.bg:3333 -u cryptonit.2 -p 2 --xintensity 300 -g 1 --thread-concurrency 16384 -w 256 --lookup-gap 0 --difficulty-multiplier 0.0039062500

this way better performance than u stated is also true for nvidia based mining with 750ti

there people report this hashrate with new ccminer 1.2 and single gtx750ti
x11 2700 x13 2100 groestl 7500 is normalized to factor  1.28 vs 1 vs 3.57

if we not go for average between amd and nividia based mining the factor is

(1.47+1.28)/2=1.37
(1+1)/2=1
(4.5+3.57)/2=4.01

so the true factor on ur defaut setting should be

x11 (6500x1.37)=8900 (so here u pretty close)
x13 (6500x1)=6500
groestl (6500x4.01)=26000

please update ur default hashrate like this or at least let ur technicans verify my numbers u will find out ur bad groestl performance have reason old driver and miner

br

cryptonit

-------------------------------
answer from them:

Hello,


I passed this information on to the tech that confirms hash rates.  That said, this is wonderful information you have provided us and I was wondering if you can point us to a forum post that we would monitor for future reference.


Thanks!


Ted
CoinWarz Support


---------------------------------

@ coinwarz team

thx that u fast respond to user feedback!
but as u know do such tests on regulary base is very time consuming
u have to scan market for mining hardware driver and mining software permanently to keep it accurate

my time is bound for diamond foundation tasks i cant offering repeat this tests regulary
but  if we dedect again groestl algo rating is way underrated we will tell ya again

br cryptonit


(the numbers on coinwarz default hashrating for compare algo hasher each 1000€ mining gear are still wrong i expect them to run own tests on all algos not only the 3 that are  included in my short tests. basical i understand their aim of new default hashrating as a atempt to defend scrypt and promote scrypte asic mining gear.........)

[HR]

Woo Hoo!  I got my DMD's in my wallet today!  It took a couple phone calls to them but they finally pulled through.  Once I had them on the phone they quickly figured out what happened.  I am a happy camper again!  I am going to test some more small purchases on Cryptsy and send to my wallet to see how it goes.  I did inform the gentleman I spoke with that we are now on 2.0.3.  He was not aware of the new wallet.

Pokeytex

Pokeytex, I'm still trying to get mine (they send me a periodic/idiotic e-mail saying they appreciate my patience, etc., but do nothing, and that after having told me over 6 weeks ago that a re-send had been approved); what phone number did you use, and who did you speak with?

PM me if you want to keep this below radar.

TIA

[danbi]

The user interface (MPOS) of http://dmdpool.digsys.bg has been updated to the latest stable version. The new version has a small button on the dashboard (down below) to turn off sound. Enjoy!

Please report any issues you may have.

[polanskiman]

Is it normal that out of 20 minting attempts only 3 were successful?

for me a clear sign of wallet without password and minting attempts when wallet didnt finish syncing

if im wrong please more details when that happens

in my transaction log i can see less than 1% failed minting attempts which will try again successful a bit later

First of, Happy BD to DMD.

My wallet does have a password and the wallet is unlocked and fully synched when I see those failed minting attempt appear. I usually unlock the wallet once it has caught up with the network and is fully synched.

I do not leave my wallet open 24/7 though.

interesting

basical failed minting attemps are disturbing to watch
and a cossmetic issue in wallet but u lose nothing they just try again

still it would be interesting to know why u fail more than others
it could be afaik u not from europe or usa that u have not much fast responding nodes near u
and u have timing issues get ur minting confirmed before someone else successful minted?

I am not worried about the cosmetic issue, but more about the the fact that most of my minting attempts are unsuccessful.

If the issue is a timing issue isn't there something you guys could do to limit this?

Here is a list of my minting attempts; Only 8 where successful to this day out of 39 attempts:

Code:

Confirmed	Date	        Type	 Amount
FALSE	2014-07-15T19:01:09	Minted	0.804109
FALSE	2014-07-15T18:21:07	Minted	0.005479
FALSE	2014-07-15T16:27:37	Minted	0.026027
TRUE	2014-07-15T11:45:30	Minted	0.168493
FALSE	2014-07-15T09:40:09	Minted	0.138356
FALSE	2014-07-14T17:26:32	Minted	0.034246
TRUE	2014-07-14T10:37:52	Minted	0.021917
FALSE	2014-07-14T10:08:33	Minted	0.183561
FALSE	2014-07-14T06:07:55	Minted	0.202739
FALSE	2014-07-14T05:43:31	Minted	0.782191
FALSE	2014-07-14T05:25:02	Minted	0.710958
FALSE	2014-07-14T03:50:16	Minted	0.856164
FALSE	2014-07-14T03:10:55	Minted	0.028767
FALSE	2014-07-13T17:07:52	Minted	0.639726
FALSE	2014-07-13T16:59:51	Minted	0.156164
FALSE	2014-07-13T15:18:55	Minted	0.012328
TRUE	2014-07-13T13:40:52	Minted	0.172602
TRUE	2014-07-13T13:12:17	Minted	0.020547
TRUE	2014-07-13T12:14:21	Minted	0.017808
FALSE	2014-07-12T08:10:23	Minted	0.032876
FALSE	2014-07-12T03:07:55	Minted	0.201369
FALSE	2014-07-12T02:12:10	Minted	0.172602
FALSE	2014-07-06T18:40:33	Minted	0.121917
FALSE	2014-07-06T12:01:31	Minted	0.026027
TRUE	2014-07-04T17:27:38	Minted	0.09041
FALSE	2014-07-04T12:10:24	Minted	0.154794
FALSE	2014-07-04T11:56:03	Minted	0.645205
TRUE	2014-07-04T10:14:09	Minted	2.875712
FALSE	2014-07-03T23:50:30	Minted	0.146575
FALSE	2014-07-03T23:49:04	Minted	0.116438
FALSE	2014-07-03T16:25:16	Minted	2.825027
TRUE	2014-07-03T15:57:27	Minted	5.953164
FALSE	2014-07-02T10:03:27	Minted	5.803849
FALSE	2014-07-02T09:38:53	Minted	5.801109
FALSE	2014-06-27T00:16:08	Minted	0.205479
FALSE	2014-06-26T23:22:22	Minted	0.09726
FALSE	2014-06-26T23:13:37	Minted	0.439726
FALSE	2014-06-26T23:10:17	Minted	0.813698
FALSE	2014-06-26T23:07:36	Minted	5.142205

[cryptonit]

still it would be interesting to know why u fail more than others
it could be afaik u not from europe or usa that u have not much fast responding nodes near u
and u have timing issues get ur minting confirmed before someone else successful minted?

If the issue is a timing issue isn't there something you guys could do to limit this?

Here is a list of my minting attempts; Only 8 where successful to this day out of 39 attempts:

as i said around 1% of minting attempts have to try a second time all other successful first attempt
we both use wallet 2.0.3 i am on windows u are on mac?
then we need to get feedback from someone on mac too if he have a poor minting success rate too

if not compare the latency of the peers that are connected to you

im my first tough would be true and u have high latency to your peers there is nothing we from diamond team can do to fix it

promote dmd in ur area try get some peers running with good latency for u and add them to ur addnode list

as we learn from mining latency is a factor
and its also a factor in minting
ur minting attempt is only successful if he is proagated fast enough in the network