Bitcoin Forum
June 01, 2024, 02:53:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Government cashed out 3M  (Read 4214 times)
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 10:37:52 PM
 #21

Whats with concerns about price. Imo btc price is next to irrelevant.
Not irrelevent, we need to keep it under 1,000 for as long as possible. If it goes up too quickly, it could be dangerous. The transition process from fiat to crypto must be slow and careful, keeping things as equal as possible.

The transition must be orderly, carefully-paced. Not a mad rush as the whole world realizes whats happening at the same time - entire national economies could get trampled! This is a very serious issue!

Why do you consider that an issue? It's about time things were shaken up a little.
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
April 27, 2014, 10:40:16 PM
 #22

Whats with concerns about price. Imo btc price is next to irrelevant.
Not irrelevent, we need to keep it under 1,000 for as long as possible. If it goes up too quickly, it could be dangerous. The transition process from fiat to crypto must be slow and careful, keeping things as equal as possible.

The transition must be orderly, carefully-paced. Not a mad rush as the whole world realizes whats happening at the same time - entire national economies could get trampled! This is a very serious issue!

Please don't frame it in a way that potentially blames BTC.
The source of danger is that fiat will be collapsing (with or without crypto), and BTC can save many people's wealth.  Smiley

wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 12:37:42 AM
 #23

Whats with concerns about price. Imo btc price is next to irrelevant.
Not irrelevent, we need to keep it under 1,000 for as long as possible. If it goes up too quickly, it could be dangerous. The transition process from fiat to crypto must be slow and careful, keeping things as equal as possible.

The transition must be orderly, carefully-paced. Not a mad rush as the whole world realizes whats happening at the same time - entire national economies could get trampled! This is a very serious issue!

Please don't frame it in a way that potentially blames BTC.
The source of danger is that fiat will be collapsing (with or without crypto), and BTC can save many people's wealth.  Smiley

We didn't start the fire! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 12:44:38 AM
 #24

Whats with concerns about price. Imo btc price is next to irrelevant.
Not irrelevent, we need to keep it under 1,000 for as long as possible. If it goes up too quickly, it could be dangerous. The transition process from fiat to crypto must be slow and careful, keeping things as equal as possible.

The transition must be orderly, carefully-paced. Not a mad rush as the whole world realizes whats happening at the same time - entire national economies could get trampled! This is a very serious issue!

Please don't frame it in a way that potentially blames BTC.
The source of danger is that fiat will be collapsing (with or without crypto), and BTC can save many people's wealth.  Smiley

We didn't start the fire! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g

You may be right!  Cheesy
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCtC-LoOvqs

fearcoka
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 12:54:56 AM
 #25

Its not hard taking money out...send it to btc-e and youre set.

Just Nao Tomori and Bitcoin ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 12:55:24 AM
 #26

Whats with concerns about price. Imo btc price is next to irrelevant.
Not irrelevent, we need to keep it under 1,000 for as long as possible. If it goes up too quickly, it could be dangerous. The transition process from fiat to crypto must be slow and careful, keeping things as equal as possible.

The transition must be orderly, carefully-paced. Not a mad rush as the whole world realizes whats happening at the same time - entire national economies could get trampled! This is a very serious issue!

Please don't frame it in a way that potentially blames BTC.
The source of danger is that fiat will be collapsing (with or without crypto), and BTC can save many people's wealth.  Smiley

We didn't start the fire! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFTLKWw542g

You may be right!  Cheesy
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCtC-LoOvqs

Haha and a Billy Joel meme is born
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1136

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 01:16:42 AM
 #27

The gov should be sued.  They should be forced to publicly auction off all BTC in order to get the taxpayers the highest possible price.  None of this "back room" transactions with their buddies.  How much did they get per BTC?

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 02:50:14 AM
 #28

The gov should be sued.  They should be forced to publicly auction off all BTC in order to get the taxpayers the highest possible price.  None of this "back room" transactions with their buddies.  How much did they get per BTC?

You might find that some of the loudest BTC critics on Capital Hill bought BTC dirt cheap.

jc01480
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500


Nope..


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 03:51:08 AM
 #29

I do not understand how this was legal, considering he has not been tried and found guilty yet.

The criminal case and the asset forfeiture case are 2 different, and often concurrent, proceedings.  Criminal responsibility requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.  The civil forfeiture case requires the preponderance of evidence, a significantly lower threshold. 

One's personal assets can be seized without having formally been charged with a crime according to US law.  While not often done this way, it's very possible.  A civil forfeiture case is filed alleging the acts that constitute a crime for which asset forfeiture is a remedy (e.g. a felony).  The government merely has to prove beyond a preponderance of the evidence that the property was proceeds, instruments, or derived from the criminal act (can't recall all of them) and get an assenting decree from a judge.  Presto!  You're stuff just became their stuff.

I don't believe the original story, either.  I'm merely pointing out that the asset forfeiture process and criminal prosecution are 2 entirely different animals in the criminal justice wild kingdom.
Rulishix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 03:55:14 AM
 #30

Wow. I wonder if this explains the sudden drop in btc prices lately. Seems to coincide.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 12:54:42 PM
 #31

Wow. I wonder if this explains the sudden drop in btc prices lately. Seems to coincide.
Actually no. This was due to China again (minimal impact though).

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 12:59:09 PM
 #32

The gov should be sued.  They should be forced to publicly auction off all BTC in order to get the taxpayers the highest possible price.  None of this "back room" transactions with their buddies.  How much did they get per BTC?

You might find that some of the loudest BTC critics on Capital Hill bought BTC dirt cheap.

Might? I'd bet on it (if it was verifiable at all). Same goes for officials in China.
gagalady
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 02:12:01 PM
 #33

Bitcoin seems to be used "wrong way", If I'm right It mentioned only $3M usd and no bitcoins officially? But how someone can prove that the gov didn't used bitcoins? There is no proof.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 02:48:33 PM
 #34

Bitcoin seems to be used "wrong way", If I'm right It mentioned only $3M usd and no bitcoins officially? But how someone can prove that the gov didn't used bitcoins? There is no proof.
You should read the article. Where would the government use $3M worth of Bitcoins anyways?

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
jc01480
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500


Nope..


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 03:07:47 PM
 #35

Bitcoin seems to be used "wrong way", If I'm right It mentioned only $3M usd and no bitcoins officially? But how someone can prove that the gov didn't used bitcoins? There is no proof.
You should read the article. Where would the government use $3M worth of Bitcoins anyways?

Clandestine operations...
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2114
Merit: 1040


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 06:05:48 PM
 #36

Bitcoin seems to be used "wrong way", If I'm right It mentioned only $3M usd and no bitcoins officially? But how someone can prove that the gov didn't used bitcoins? There is no proof.
You should read the article. Where would the government use $3M worth of Bitcoins anyways?

Long-term wealth?
$3M USD is nothing to the Gov, but someday Satoshis blocks will be worth a stunning amount of fiat and gold. 
Does "Satoshi" have control of those blocks?

Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
April 28, 2014, 07:31:21 PM
 #37

Long-term wealth?
$3M USD is nothing to the Gov, but someday Satoshis blocks will be worth a stunning amount of fiat and gold. 
Does "Satoshi" have control of those blocks?
No Satoshi does not?

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
counter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


Time is on our side, yes it is!


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:31:43 PM
 #38

I see this as a bad thing for because this isn't exactly good press IMO.  That being said I don't really know what the outcome of this whole things will be so I'll wait and learn more and see what is what for lack of a better term.
bigasic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:37:30 PM
 #39

Dont forget the 120k plus bitcoins that russ ulbricht and the govt agreed to sale. This was agreed to a month or two ago. So, 120k plus coins hitting the market would def bring the price down.. not only that, the original coins that were seized were also going to be converted to fiat..
findftp
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1006

Delusional crypto obsessionist


View Profile
April 28, 2014, 07:44:27 PM
 #40

blockchain transaction or it didn't happen
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!