Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 04:08:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Do you want Governments to make 51% attacks illegal?  (Read 2205 times)
Brangdon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 365
Merit: 251


View Profile
May 01, 2014, 08:10:31 PM
 #41

Let's say a government tried to enact a law to prevent 51% attacks, how do you regulate it?

"You may go no higher then 50% of the Global hash rate"....
No. Having 51% of the hashpower should not be illegal. Attempting to use that power to defraud someone should be, and probably already is. At least from a common sense point of view, issuing a transaction that pays Bob, and then issuing another transaction that sends the same coins to yourself instead of Bob, is a pretty unambiguous attempt to defraud. It's legality does not need to depend on you having 51%.

(Some people argue that double-spending can be a normal part of a payment protocol, eg for micro-payments. However, although those protocol may involve creating conflicting transactions, so far as I know only one of those transactions actually needs to get broadcast to the network. Still, it might be best to avoid naive legislation.)

Bitcoin: 1BrangfWu2YGJ8W6xNM7u66K4YNj2mie3t Nxt: NXT-XZQ9-GRW7-7STD-ES4DB
1714622919
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714622919

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714622919
Reply with quote  #2

1714622919
Report to moderator
1714622919
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714622919

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714622919
Reply with quote  #2

1714622919
Report to moderator
1714622919
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714622919

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714622919
Reply with quote  #2

1714622919
Report to moderator
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714622919
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714622919

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714622919
Reply with quote  #2

1714622919
Report to moderator
1714622919
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714622919

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714622919
Reply with quote  #2

1714622919
Report to moderator
1714622919
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714622919

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714622919
Reply with quote  #2

1714622919
Report to moderator
LostDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
May 01, 2014, 11:08:26 PM
 #42

Ya'll just scared.

My $.02.

Wink

Corporations For Crypto
Protect Your Assets and Reduce Your Tax Liability With A Kansas Corporation!
We Demand Justice From BFL
grifferz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 01, 2014, 11:27:02 PM
 #43

This is a very silly question because if a 51% attack is a realistic possibility — and if it does actually cause a problem — nothing any government does is going to help.

On the other hand if a 51% attack is not realistic or is ineffectual, then who cares?

So anyone who thinks a government should have a role in that would be welcome to spend many lifetimes in court arguing about it; meanwhile such attacks will either succeed or fail regardless.

There is no universe where a government declares such a thing illegal, and then is able to defend a cryptocurrency against it.

You may as well ask if a government should legislate the value of Pi. It could happen but maths would continue to work or not regardless.
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!