Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2024, 06:56:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bounty for open source ByteCoin/Monero pool  (Read 14657 times)
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:34:28 AM
 #41

DStrange reported that he sent 5 million BCN and 0.3 BTC from BCN's funds.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:46:21 AM
 #42

DStrange reported that he sent 5 million BCN and 0.3 BTC from BCN's funds.

Both received.

I also received another 0.1 BTC, maybe from surfer43?

Balances:

5439 MRO
0.685 BTC
5100000 BCN
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 06, 2014, 09:59:03 AM
 #43

Awesome. Thank you, BCN community.
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 08:47:11 AM
 #44

Awesome. Thank you, BCN community.

Looking forward to this pool being completed. Will give some people who havent had much luck solo mining a way to get some coins.

However it is important that there are a number of pools soon after as everyone will mine on the pool giving it way more than 50% of the hashing power.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
May 07, 2014, 08:55:54 AM
 #45

Awesome. Thank you, BCN community.

Looking forward to this pool being completed. Will give some people who havent had much luck solo mining a way to get some coins.

However it is important that there are a number of pools soon after as everyone will mine on the pool giving it way more than 50% of the hashing power.

That is why we have specified the bounty for an open source pool implementation. This will allow many people to create pools.

Cheesus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 692
Merit: 254


terra-credit.com


View Profile
May 07, 2014, 09:56:06 AM
 #46

Sent another 498k BCN to the pool's bounty.

███████████████████████
  █████████████████████ 
    ███████████████████ 
      █████████████████ 
███████████████████████
          █████████████ 
            ███████████ 
              █████████ 
                ███████ 
                  ████ 
                    ███ 
                     
terracredit


















Powered by,
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
May 07, 2014, 10:03:05 AM
 #47

Sent another 498k BCN to the pool's bounty.

Received your 498K

I also received another donation of 130555.555. I don't know where that came from but I thank the contributor.

BCN total: 5728555.55500000
tacotime (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 08, 2014, 02:58:20 PM
 #48

Bounties have been updated

Zone117x has stated that there is a good deal of difficulty in producing a pool for this coin because of the unique scripting language. He stated that a custom http server may need to be built to fetch/send work.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
tacotime (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 10, 2014, 09:33:20 PM
 #49

Two FOSS mining pools are nearing completion and will be published on Github soon. One is by zone117x and another is by archit_.

My question is if the community would be okay dividing the bounty between both zone117x and archit_ in the event that both softwares are released around the same time. zone117x is concerned that his advanced stratum implementation will not be complete before archit_'s, because it takes a considerable amount longer to generate than a simple mining pool.

If archit_ is out there, I would appreciate his response too, and would hope that he's considerate of the hard work zone117x has been putting in over the past week to get his software completed.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 10, 2014, 09:49:21 PM
 #50

Sounds fair to me. Monero/CryptoNote has both an immediate need for a functioning pool as well as a long term need for something scalable and high-performance.
David Latapie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Monero Core Team


View Profile WWW
May 10, 2014, 09:51:12 PM
 #51

I agree too. Both for moral reason and because more pool means less centralization.

Monero: the first crytocurrency to bring bank secrecy and net neutrality to the blockchain.HyperStake: pushing the limits of staking.
Reputation threadFree bitcoins: reviews, hints…: freebitco.in, freedoge.co.in, qoinpro
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 10:07:18 PM
 #52

I agree too. Both for moral reason and because more pool means less centralization.

You can have more pools even with only one open source implementation Wink

I agree they should share the bounty, if they are equal. However if one is clearly better than the other and will obviously be the one used then I do think that person should get a larger share.
dnaleor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000


Want privacy? Use Monero!


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 11:28:25 PM
 #53

I agree too. Both for moral reason and because more pool means less centralization.

You can have more pools even with only one open source implementation Wink

I agree they should share the bounty, if they are equal. However if one is clearly better than the other and will obviously be the one used then I do think that person should get a larger share.

I agree both (working) pools should get at least a part. If both are finished withing (let's say) 5 days of eachother, we can do a vote on the percentage. Taking into consideration the complexity of the pool and the the release date. Votes should be done by the number of MRO contributed (1 MRO is one vote)
Quanttek
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 10, 2014, 11:30:59 PM
 #54

I think sharing would be much more fair. So we have a longterm solution and something for now. We should then probably decide, if someone gets a larger share, if his pool is clearly better.

Enthusiast. Neither trader, nor miner and also no big investor.
Community Manager for Monero
PM if you need mine to exchange or anti-cheat algorithm for node-cryptonote-pool
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
May 10, 2014, 11:34:54 PM
 #55

I agree too. Both for moral reason and because more pool means less centralization.

You can have more pools even with only one open source implementation Wink

Multiple decentralized implementation are good too though. If there a exploit or even just a bug in one implementation and all the pools using it get hacked or crash, the other pools wouldn't be affected.

I will likely solo mine for the foreseeable future and encourage others to do so even though payouts are erratic. So there will likely be a surviving network even if pools get hacked, but more layers of protection are better.



33zer0w0lf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2014, 12:49:07 AM
 #56

Two FOSS mining pools are nearing completion and will be published on Github soon. One is by zone117x and another is by archit_.

My question is if the community would be okay dividing the bounty between both zone117x and archit_ in the event that both softwares are released around the same time. zone117x is concerned that his advanced stratum implementation will not be complete before archit_'s, because it takes a considerable amount longer to generate than a simple mining pool.

If archit_ is out there, I would appreciate his response too, and would hope that he's considerate of the hard work zone117x has been putting in over the past week to get his software completed.
are these pools out yet?

http://www.extremepool.org (BCN) (MRO) (QCN) (XDN) (BBR) (AEON) (ORION) (DSH) (CRR) (INF8)
tacotime (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 11, 2014, 12:50:35 AM
 #57

are these pools out yet?

pre-alpha yes
https://github.com/zone117x/node-cryptonote-pool

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
archit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 159
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 01:11:20 AM
Last edit: May 11, 2014, 02:18:14 PM by archit
 #58

Another status update, network code 20% done. miners can connect, receive work and submit shares already Cheesy

I'm okay with splitting up the reward as long as it's half, within a week and much better

UPDATE: Share validation done!

UPDATE 2: Messed up but almost complete code https://github.com/archit120/Monero-Pool

UPDATE 3: Completely functional now, without a web end though as of now. Yet to be tested

UPDATE 4: Changed DB to Redis
archit
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 159
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 11, 2014, 02:19:01 PM
 #59

First test pool from archit_ is apparently up and running at 117.197.73.139:7707

Code:
simpleminer.exe --pool-addr 117.197.73.139:7707 --login [address] --pass [anything]

Down already Cheesy It was on my personal computer and I had to go
tacotime (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
May 11, 2014, 02:21:38 PM
 #60

Down already Cheesy It was on my personal computer and I had to go

Oh haha... sorry about that, I tried to remove my post after I realized you were just providing the address to test connections. X)

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!