Scammer and blackmailer - loljosh (Calling trusted members)

[loljosh]

so, everything is ok between you two?
is the problem solved or you want to accusing each other again?
i've invested some btc on this coin
light me up what is your plan

I want him to apologize to this community and refund all the btc to investors.

[1713530186]

1713530186

[1713530186]

1713530186

[1713530186]

1713530186

[1713530186]

1713530186

[tocoolforschool]

lol so many cheap scumbags on these forums

[SomeRelax]

lol so many cheap scumbags on these forums

who you talking about?

[aeciocoin]

so, everything is ok between you two?
is the problem solved or you want to accusing each other again?
i've invested some btc on this coin
light me up what is your plan

I want him to apologize to this community and refund all the btc to investors.

you can ask apologize after refund, no before. because this money isn't your.

[tocoolforschool]

take your pick

lol so many cheap scumbags on these forums

who you talking about?

[acs267]

take your pick

lol so many cheap scumbags on these forums

who you talking about?

I have to say the same, surprisingly. They both seemed to want to 'cheat' the other of something.

You guys just need to solve it. Either fixing or via a refund.

[BCCdev]

I think the biggest problem is/was communication.

For me, working as an IT specialist, it is 100% clear, that if seomeone is going to create sth for just 0.2 BTC (85$ or 63€), that he rly CANT provide a first class service support. Thats just not possible.
Even for a free worker, like the BCCtalkcoin programmer, it is just to less money.

But its wrong of him, asking for more money now after he did the job.

For me, the Windows Wallet is working stable.
Same for the Linux wallet, its running since more than 2 full days now without any crash.


Also my linux wallet has more than 27 Connections, sometimes it goes up to more than 40 Connections. So i think, the programmer did a good work by the time, because as i said, its running very stable.

You 2 guys should go to skype/teamspeak or whatever, trying to talk in person.


Some ppl mentioned it before: speaking a foreign language, can be hard for some ppl. Even if you think you speak perfect english, the other person might not speak perfect english, is asking for sth but for real, the tryed to say sth totally different.


Maybe sth like this happend for you two guys also. I would talk about it instead of typeing unfriendly stuff

I never asked him to pay me more BTC. Here is the screenshot in which he is offering me more BTC:

I see, you didnt but he offered it.
Rly seems like u have a communication problem!!
Dunno if its from the foreign language or why, but:

Shouldnt now be everything ok again?
U got your 0.2 BTC and BCCdev got a working coin.

There are sometimes wrong virus messages, especially on virustotal.com
If you create sth, and check it vs an immaginarry unlimited amount of different virus scanners, one of them will say its a virus for 100%.

It would have been bad, if loljosh would have compiled the wallet with lets say 30% if all virustotal.com scanners, but he didnt.

I got paid 0.2 BTC as we decided. But what about the later payment that he promised about after providing him update. You can clearly see on the thread that the new update is live and working perfect.

Well it's up to you two and not rly my business,but:

If the part of the 0.2BTC wasnt the coin being a PoS after x days, then i think loljosh should get a little bonus from BCCdev.



But as a reminder for everyone: Don't setup any "contracts" without haveing an escrow.

loljosh is again trying to confuse everyone by posting just 1 screenshot and trying to get it out of context. Too bad everyone here is not dumb!
Please check: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=593562.msg6516862#msg6516862

[BCCdev]

BTW more scam accusations popping up against loljosh!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.msg6526257#msg6526257

[BCCdev]

Also to those asking to pay him more, please read comments from https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589523.msg6522645#msg6522645
His code is still having tons of issues. If any escrow would be involved it was an immediate refund!

[BCCdev]

Also, if you see from his trust rating:

ITGeniusGuru:
"Delivered non-working coin to me twice. First Windows wallet never launched, it woud show an error and close. Second walet never Syn'd. Technical Support promised was very un-professional and never resolved the issues. I ended-up with two dead coins for wich I paid 0.2 BTC."

[acs267]

Also, if you see from his trust rating:

ITGeniusGuru:
"Delivered non-working coin to me twice. First Windows wallet never launched, it woud show an error and close. Second walet never Syn'd. Technical Support promised was very un-professional and never resolved the issues. I ended-up with two dead coins for wich I paid 0.2 BTC."

Woah, dude, you could you please edit your text into the original post, instead of making new posts just to bump it?

[Bansheroom]

You can get the source checked by any developer of this community that the coin is working perfectly.

Not telling anything about who is a scammer here - if anyone.
Just, i need no developer to see that the coin, at least the windows wallet is far away from working perfectly.
Many people have the same issues with it, so you are at least a proven bad coder.

[@ThisWeeksCoin]

I've been witness and these are the facts:


1.- Josh agreed to make the coin for 0.2 BTC
3.- Josh delivered the coin working fine.
4.- Then the BTCtalkcoin guy asked him to get a refund threatening to give him bad reputation if he didn't do it.
5.- Josh told him there wasn't a reason to give him a refund since the coin was delivered working
6.- The BTCtalkcoin guy insisted.
7.- Josh told him the only way he would give him the 0.2 BTC back was if he returned the IPO money to all the investors

Conclusion: The BTCtalkcoin guy is just a desperate greedy pig.

BTW: I told Josh not to deal with Indians without escrow.

1) templar77, Don't generalize people. With your comment you're showing that you're a racist. I know what you mean with that comment, but others don't.
I know many good "Indians". We're people after all.

2) loljosh, was your product fully functional? Including staking after the block that dev told you he wanted it to start?
What were the issues he had?

a) You may ask from him to apologize for his stupidity, but you can't tell him to refund people. It's his business. Same thing if someone did that for your services, if something went wrong. ( Which seems something was wrong with that IPO coin )

3) BCCDev, get a life. You didn't give him your virginity. People flip 0.2btc in 10 minutes for fun on mintpal.
Your attitude is not good. That's why all this fuss was created. Approach people with a calm attitude. Good luck in the future.

( Yes, you paid him to do something, but that doesn't mean that you own him. )


What really happened here is: Misunderstanding.



-TWC

[coinjohn]

I've been witness and these are the facts:


1.- Josh agreed to make the coin for 0.2 BTC
3.- Josh delivered the coin working fine.
4.- Then the BTCtalkcoin guy asked him to get a refund threatening to give him bad reputation if he didn't do it.
5.- Josh told him there wasn't a reason to give him a refund since the coin was delivered working
6.- The BTCtalkcoin guy insisted.
7.- Josh told him the only way he would give him the 0.2 BTC back was if he returned the IPO money to all the investors

Conclusion: The BTCtalkcoin guy is just a desperate greedy pig.

BTW: I told Josh not to deal with Indians without escrow.

1) templar77, Don't generalize people. With your comment you're showing that you're a racist. I know what you mean with that comment, but others don't.
I know many good "Indians". We're people after all.

2) loljosh, was your product fully functional? Including staking after the block that dev told you he wanted it to start?
What were the issues he had?

a) You may ask from him to apologize for his stupidity, but you can't tell him to refund people. It's his business. Same thing if someone did that for your services, if something went wrong. ( Which seems something was wrong with that IPO coin )

3) BCCDev, get a life. You didn't give him your virginity. People flip 0.2btc in 10 minutes for fun on mintpal.
Your attitude is not good. That's why all this fuss was created. Approach people with a calm attitude. Good luck in the future.

( Yes, you paid him to do something, but that doesn't mean that you own him. )


What really happened here is: Misunderstanding.



-TWC

lol, i totally agree with ThisWeeksCoin on this one, i don't know how old each one of you is, but trying to openly offend someone's reputation can only backfire in business.
Please behave like adults and work this through, only good communication can make things work properly

[milly6]

I've been witness and these are the facts:


1.- Josh agreed to make the coin for 0.2 BTC
3.- Josh delivered the coin working fine.
4.- Then the BTCtalkcoin guy asked him to get a refund threatening to give him bad reputation if he didn't do it.
5.- Josh told him there wasn't a reason to give him a refund since the coin was delivered working
6.- The BTCtalkcoin guy insisted.
7.- Josh told him the only way he would give him the 0.2 BTC back was if he returned the IPO money to all the investors

Conclusion: The BTCtalkcoin guy is just a desperate greedy pig.

BTW: I told Josh not to deal with Indians without escrow.

I dont believe this post with your buttering of racism thrown in. The BTCtalkcoin guy seems fine to me and the coin did not "work fine".

Conclusion: You are "loljosh"