Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2017, 10:11:11 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Where would you prefer the VRC/VRM exchange pair be?
Bittrex
Poloniex
Both
Other

Pages: « 1 ... 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 [712] 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 ... 963 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released  (Read 1342264 times)
buy4crypto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434

freecrypto.top


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2014, 11:36:20 AM
 #14221

i skipped through alll the fud lol VISA MOTHERFUCKERS!!!!! woot woot I'm fkn dancing ! this is HUGE news!!! let the haters hate!  we really need a moderated thread now... vericoin is getting really serious now and with all this and VISA, we need a place where the investors can go and get real info without the spam from the regular...

even with news like VISA their still trying to fud bahahahhaha

great job vericoin!!!

here come world!!!

 spread the word!!!

VRC-CC!!!!

Remember this classic post?

"this is HUGE news!!! let the haters hate!"

Remember how you showed such interest in calling me a troll, in how I was just here to FUD. That this was the best thing ever. I can bring up 10's more posts like this for you, from you. Why not continue to cheer the news, like you have been, why not continue to call my last post, and everything else I have done FUD.

Just days ago you said you had your first hater, several times. I suppose you refered to me. Well please, re-read everything and realize you don't mean anything to me, I don't know who you are, don't care. But I have done everything in my power to give you, and others the ability to think for yourself. Hopefully now you realize your "hater" was trying to help you since the minute you spoke up to troll me.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
████ - freecrypto.top - btcinfo.top - DIGITAL CURRENCY DIRECTORIES - freeMonero.comfunbtc.xyz  ████
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1512987071
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512987071

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512987071
Reply with quote  #2

1512987071
Report to moderator
1512987071
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512987071

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512987071
Reply with quote  #2

1512987071
Report to moderator
sluppy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274



View Profile
August 25, 2014, 11:43:13 AM
 #14222

So if true, Coinsis requires that 15k USD be gained from where? Did this come from the developers pocket? VeriFund? Should the VeriFund be controlled by 3 people, who in secrecy use the funds to make deals with third parties? This must be a troll, because if true, unbelievable! No wonder my attempts to ask for clarity all where ignored. The worst part is, the people who control all the decisions / development funds have proven to be terrible business people.


Can someone from the dev team that Knows how and what happend answer this please ?
I dont want to read what Tom Dick and Harry Think happend just the actual information please Id like to know.

altcoinUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 11:44:16 AM
 #14223

@altcoinuk @barabbas

One last word to altcoinuk: Island, Greenland and most of the scaninavian people are descendants of the Vikings (never been to school?)


The issue here is not my school - the main issue is here that it seems you are still in school. From your idealistic posts I have to assume you are in high school in best case scenario.

Otherwise you would understand that since you praised the enthusiasm of the Vikings, I have pointed out, that the practicality and level headed attitude of the Swiss people is more productive, especially in projects like a crypto currency in which the expertise, logical reasoning and problem solving are more important than shouting hurrah after hurrah for every lame move of the devs. I mean you can shout hurrah in every posts if you like that, but some actual work would help more fore the coin.
onsightit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


truth=(true?true:false);


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2014, 11:53:42 AM
 #14224

Goood LORD! Three pages of the barabbas / altcoinUK comedy show over night!  I'm officially hitting the ignore button on both of them to save my internet bandwidth.  What a waste...

VRC: VMTMcvFjZHAshmVNLY5KYVHCTqcfEnH6Bd  SLR: 8W7D6D7rortYp51BK9MSrfripSoZWyVPVr  BTC: 1LbgAsTDtyWEGjiSaguJhJbaHBPgcMnHfP  BCC: 1Ta39PK67VXTD2xnmPNo5J9KJyBVHdYmy
ereborltc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 12:10:51 PM
 #14225

i skipped through alll the fud lol VISA MOTHERFUCKERS!!!!! woot woot I'm fkn dancing ! this is HUGE news!!! let the haters hate!  we really need a moderated thread now... vericoin is getting really serious now and with all this and VISA, we need a place where the investors can go and get real info without the spam from the regular...

even with news like VISA their still trying to fud bahahahhaha

great job vericoin!!!

here come world!!!

 spread the word!!!

VRC-CC!!!!

Remember this classic post?

"this is HUGE news!!! let the haters hate!"

Remember how you showed such interest in calling me a troll, in how I was just here to FUD. That this was the best thing ever. I can bring up 10's more posts like this for you, from you. Why not continue to cheer the news, like you have been, why not continue to call my last post, and everything else I have done FUD.

Just days ago you said you had your first hater, several times. I suppose you refered to me. Well please, re-read everything and realize you don't mean anything to me, I don't know who you are, don't care. But I have done everything in my power to give you, and others the ability to think for yourself. Hopefully now you realize your "hater" was trying to help you since the minute you spoke up to troll me.
well from these last two posts you seem like a reasonable person so i don't know why i would say you were fudding unless you being rude and calling us investors/"cheerleaders" a waste of people and senseless posts, yes sometimes i get excited cause i actually like what vericoin does and is about... i am not someone that can help vericoin in any tech way ..im being honest .. all I'm good for is investing in buying vericoin i continue to accumulate and stake.. I'm a day trader but i don't trade vericoin i currently have 16000$ invested...im very busy as i own a jean  manufacturing company and a clothing brand and i also distribute other brands in canada... i will be accepting vericoin on my webshop as soon as its revamped as we speak... i do what i can . which I'm sure u know already since u went through my previous posts

so with that being said if you weren't bashing me calling me a cheerleader i do apologize but i don't apologize for being excited about the visa/coinsis ann because i like and support it if coinsis turns out to be a proper business.

altcoinUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 12:23:24 PM
 #14226

So if true, Coinsis requires that 15k USD be gained from where? Did this come from the developers pocket? VeriFund? Should the VeriFund be controlled by 3 people, who in secrecy use the funds to make deals with third parties? This must be a troll, because if true, unbelievable! No wonder my attempts to ask for clarity all where ignored. The worst part is, the people who control all the decisions / development funds have proven to be terrible business people.


Does anyone have anything to say to me who has been bashing me as a troll over the past days? This is exactly the type of stuff our community should be fully aware of. From the  minute of this announcement deal I had more questions than answers. I have done all I can do, reasonably, responsibly, without overreaching. If you all don't want to hear the truth, that is fine. Its why I don't continue to beat a dead horse. If others see why, for days I have been looking for clarity, then please step up and demand answers!

Nothing to say, because you have asked rational questions and pointed out valid issues, you failed to celebrate the lame move of the devs, therefore you are a troll and a FUDder.
The very few, but loud silver coin makers, IRC scammers (who bought the coin at 500 Sat so can dump slowly even at 9k) and 16-23 years old enthusiastic fans (they have max 10k coin each) made this crypto currency project a cult. The ritual is simple, you need to worship the word of the devs, the cult members can't question the direction and they are happy with the 9k price and basically anything that the devs spit on the market like the lame VISA card idea.

Please continue to post your valuable questions and opinion, so potential investors can see there are reasonable people here, and the very few silver coin maker, IRC scammer, delusional supporter and the attitude that brought the coin to the 9k price is not the majority here.
setup
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 12:31:06 PM
 #14227

To all the fudders in here: take a look at the roadmap and tell me which other coin offers you such a wide range of features (thx to Socal for doing such a great job with Verinews)




https://litebit.eu/registration/de/3337ouEH2M/
Add a VRC banner to your Website & support VERICOIN
onsightit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


truth=(true?true:false);


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2014, 01:33:08 PM
 #14228

Goood LORD! Three pages of the barabbas / altcoinUK comedy show over night!  I'm officially hitting the ignore button on both of them to save my internet bandwidth.  What a waste...


Wow... I can see clearly now the fud is gone... gonna be a bright, bright, bright, sun shiny day.



VRC: VMTMcvFjZHAshmVNLY5KYVHCTqcfEnH6Bd  SLR: 8W7D6D7rortYp51BK9MSrfripSoZWyVPVr  BTC: 1LbgAsTDtyWEGjiSaguJhJbaHBPgcMnHfP  BCC: 1Ta39PK67VXTD2xnmPNo5J9KJyBVHdYmy
Kevondo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
August 25, 2014, 01:54:49 PM
 #14229

So if true, Coinsis requires that 15k USD be gained from where? Did this come from the developers pocket? VeriFund? Should the VeriFund be controlled by 3 people, who in secrecy use the funds to make deals with third parties? This must be a troll, because if true, unbelievable! No wonder my attempts to ask for clarity all where ignored. The worst part is, the people who control all the decisions / development funds have proven to be terrible business people.


Can someone from the dev team that Knows how and what happend answer this please ?
I dont want to read what Tom Dick and Harry Think happend just the actual information please Id like to know.



Effects to Cause is the Dev handling the coinsis project. VeriCoins' agreement is signed.

The deal in place with Coinsis includes a "Non-Disclosure" clause

Effects has mentioned this several times. He can't say anything until coinsis makes their announcments.

The tone of the BC article makes me think BC hasn't "signed" their agreement with Coinsis yet.

If they had ( and had the same deal as VRC) they would  be bound by the same Non-Disclourse restriction.

 One might infer that BC doesn't have a "signed" agreement with Coinsis yet or (if they do) they're violating the "Non-Disclosure Agreement" (NDA)

.

███████████████████████
███████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
█████████████
██████████████
██████████████
██████████████
██████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
██████████████
███████████████
█████████
███████████████
████████
████████████████████
█████████
██████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████












effectsToCause
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 757

VeriCoin Creator/Developer


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2014, 02:04:00 PM
 #14230

So if true, Coinsis requires that 15k USD be gained from where? Did this come from the developers pocket? VeriFund? Should the VeriFund be controlled by 3 people, who in secrecy use the funds to make deals with third parties? This must be a troll, because if true, unbelievable! No wonder my attempts to ask for clarity all where ignored. The worst part is, the people who control all the decisions / development funds have proven to be terrible business people.


Can someone from the dev team that Knows how and what happend answer this please ?
I dont want to read what Tom Dick and Harry Think happend just the actual information please Id like to know.



Effects to Cause is the Dev handling the coinsis project. VeriCoins' agreement is signed.

The deal in place with Coinsis includes a "Non-Disclosure" clause

Effects has mentioned this several times. He can't say anythig until coinsis makes their announcments.

The tone of the BC article makes me think BC hasn't "signed" their agreement with Coinsis yet.

If they had ( and had the same deal as VRC) they would  be bound by the same Non-Disclourse restriction.

 One might infer that BC doesn't have a "signed" agreement with Coinsis yet or (if they do) they're violating the "Non-Disclosure Agreement" (NDA)

Thanks Kevondo, this is the current state and I have mentioned it multiple times.  If you are very concerned PM me and I will give as much info as I can, thanks.  We have not used the VeriFund and only would after talking with the community first.

Also it is getting harder and harder for us to keep up to date on every forum post.  If you have concerns that are urgent or pressing please email vericoin@vericoin.info, this forwards to all three devs.  Or pm us here, it's easy to miss a question or comment here, thanks.
defier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 197


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 04:18:45 PM
 #14231

2 more, novel writers, to add to the ignore list.  Ignoring altcoinuk and buy4crypto shrank the forum page count by 11 pages.
I believe in completely un-moderated forums.  It gives us the choice to see opposing views and occasionally find out important negative information.  

It also leaves with us the responsibility to self censor FUD bots that write volumes of fluff, trying to justify their position.  Some are obvious plants that are FUD fishing.  Trying to get anyone to say anything that can be use against them, regardless if its in or out of context.

FUDders, a bit of advice.  Make your points quickly.  Our eyes glaze over about the 4th line into your paragraph. If you haven't made the point yet?  We've already moved on to the next post.  And lost are your, extravagant long winded, attempts at word smithing.

Keep to the points, and I'll read your posts to see if you have valid argument.  I don't have time to read and reread War and Peace, just to find out over and over, that you still don't like something.

barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 05:28:47 PM
 #14232

So if true, Coinsis requires that 15k USD be gained from where? Did this come from the developers pocket? VeriFund? Should the VeriFund be controlled by 3 people, who in secrecy use the funds to make deals with third parties? This must be a troll, because if true, unbelievable! No wonder my attempts to ask for clarity all where ignored. The worst part is, the people who control all the decisions / development funds have proven to be terrible business people.


Can someone from the dev team that Knows how and what happend answer this please ?
I dont want to read what Tom Dick and Harry Think happend just the actual information please Id like to know.



Effects to Cause is the Dev handling the coinsis project. VeriCoins' agreement is signed.

The deal in place with Coinsis includes a "Non-Disclosure" clause

Effects has mentioned this several times. He can't say anythig until coinsis makes their announcments.

The tone of the BC article makes me think BC hasn't "signed" their agreement with Coinsis yet.

If they had ( and had the same deal as VRC) they would  be bound by the same Non-Disclourse restriction.

 One might infer that BC doesn't have a "signed" agreement with Coinsis yet or (if they do) they're violating the "Non-Disclosure Agreement" (NDA)

Thanks Kevondo, this is the current state and I have mentioned it multiple times.  If you are very concerned PM me and I will give as much info as I can, thanks.  We have not used the VeriFund and only would after talking with the community first.

Also it is getting harder and harder for us to keep up to date on every forum post.  If you have concerns that are urgent or pressing please email vericoin@vericoin.info, this forwards to all three devs.  Or pm us here, it's easy to miss a question or comment here, thanks.

Once again, the evidence shows the reality of things: We have two children (the third doesn't even seem to interfere in these types of things), leading this.
I can only imagine the expert salespeople of Coinsis handling these two in their conversations... but hey, what do you expect? Let's be real.

Once again, first of all, the Visa deal is not even a deal worth mentioning on any level for it is something of no significance whatsoever, therefore it should have been mentioned only at the time where implementation would be only pending majority approval by the stakeholders (that would be US, the owners of the coin). If, as it seems, Nosker was so compelled to mention it for the purpose of hyping (as everyone knows I am ALL for "hyping" -creating momentum, actually-), there wouldn't have been any NDA violation simply stating that VRC was in active discussion for a credit card company to include it in it's rooster of clients. Truth, no details, and same hype... only with people in the forums -people like me and others- clarifying pros and cons long before vote submissions.

Instead, the band that can't shoot straight, makes the announcement several months before it can be implemented, with a company that no one knows and, apparently, at a cost no one will ever be willing to pay -because it isn't worth it not even remotely-. Wow, not only children running the ship but not the sharpest children you could find.

In any event, as stated above, this deal will probably never materialize. If it does will be yet another negative for Vericoin for no one will use it and, above all, it isn't anything different -only bigger fees and payment in advance-, from the link to Moolah in the wallet... only a portable link in plastic. To even dedicate two minutes to think, let alone discuss it, is just a total waste of time.
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 05:30:28 PM
 #14233

2 more, novel writers, to add to the ignore list.  Ignoring altcoinuk and buy4crypto shrank the forum page count by 11 pages.
I believe in completely un-moderated forums.  It gives us the choice to see opposing views and occasionally find out important negative information.  

It also leaves with us the responsibility to self censor FUD bots that write volumes of fluff, trying to justify their position.  Some are obvious plants that are FUD fishing.  Trying to get anyone to say anything that can be use against them, regardless if its in or out of context.

FUDders, a bit of advice.  Make your points quickly.  Our eyes glaze over about the 4th line into your paragraph. If you haven't made the point yet?  We've already moved on to the next post.  And lost are your, extravagant long winded, attempts at word smithing.

Keep to the points, and I'll read your posts to see if you have valid argument.  I don't have time to read and reread War and Peace, just to find out over and over, that you still don't like something.



  ^^  Example of someone that obviously belongs in veritalk but somehow cannot convince himself because, well, he just cannot help but trolling.
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 05:49:17 PM
 #14234

To all the fudders in here: take a look at the roadmap and tell me which other coin offers you such a wide range of features (thx to Socal for doing such a great job with Verinews)





This is just amazing, really:

What Vericoin has:

1.- Verybit. Every coin has it. Every single one even much less established than Vericoin. You exchange it for BTC (including the waiting times of up to one hour and more of BTC), and then it is golden. Exactly the same process as if you would sell your coins in an exchange and paid from that account in BTC. Amazing "asset", isn't it?

2.- VeriSMS. You can use your mobile phone when you don't have internet service (Huh Maybe in the Himalaya mountains, high, really high on them??). OK, let's assume that you just WANT to use it and not bother with your internet. You will have to input the wallet address of any recipient of your funds... an d that is not exactly a walk in the park, is it? Chances are, 99.99% of the time, that you will send your irretrievable VRCs to someone not even remotely intended to.
The expected usage of this "feature" is 1 in 1 million transactions... being quite generous. Oh, lets not forget that, according to the roadmap, the devs are in the (long Huh) process of eliminating the need to input the wallet's addresses by copying/pasting what boxxa's has already implemente in PINK.

3.- Verisend. Since it is optional, no one will use it of course by the simple reason that it is so low in the ranking of purported anonymous ways to send money, that it will be like using generic bleach instead of clorox, for the same price.

Now, if you look at the other "features" listed as in different levels of progression, you will see that there's no real path but a diversity of projects of no significance whatsoever that will never either be implemented or used or both. Of note is the mention of the multi-pool that still doesn't work proper (it's a random thing), that still pays much less than any savvy investor will get on their own and that, obviously, bachelor number 3 doesn't have any idea of how to fix properly.

Now people insist that I must be "nice" instead of blunt and  "positive" in my criticism (as it that wasn't a contradiction in terms). How can you, if you are not full of shit and willing to lie? How?
MAD945
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532



View Profile
August 25, 2014, 05:51:14 PM
 #14235

So if true, Coinsis requires that 15k USD be gained from where? Did this come from the developers pocket? VeriFund? Should the VeriFund be controlled by 3 people, who in secrecy use the funds to make deals with third parties? This must be a troll, because if true, unbelievable! No wonder my attempts to ask for clarity all where ignored. The worst part is, the people who control all the decisions / development funds have proven to be terrible business people.


Can someone from the dev team that Knows how and what happend answer this please ?
I dont want to read what Tom Dick and Harry Think happend just the actual information please Id like to know.



Effects to Cause is the Dev handling the coinsis project. VeriCoins' agreement is signed.

The deal in place with Coinsis includes a "Non-Disclosure" clause

Effects has mentioned this several times. He can't say anythig until coinsis makes their announcments.

The tone of the BC article makes me think BC hasn't "signed" their agreement with Coinsis yet.

If they had ( and had the same deal as VRC) they would  be bound by the same Non-Disclourse restriction.

 One might infer that BC doesn't have a "signed" agreement with Coinsis yet or (if they do) they're violating the "Non-Disclosure Agreement" (NDA)

Thanks Kevondo, this is the current state and I have mentioned it multiple times.  If you are very concerned PM me and I will give as much info as I can, thanks.  We have not used the VeriFund and only would after talking with the community first.

Also it is getting harder and harder for us to keep up to date on every forum post.  If you have concerns that are urgent or pressing please email vericoin@vericoin.info, this forwards to all three devs.  Or pm us here, it's easy to miss a question or comment here, thanks.

Once again, the evidence shows the reality of things: We have two children (the third doesn't even seem to interfere in these types of things), leading this.
I can only imagine the expert salespeople of Coinsis handling these two in their conversations... but hey, what do you expect? Let's be real.

Once again, first of all, the Visa deal is not even a deal worth mentioning on any level for it is something of no significance whatsoever, therefore it should have been mentioned only at the time where implementation would be only pending majority approval by the stakeholders (that would be US, the owners of the coin). If, as it seems, Nosker was so compelled to mention it for the purpose of hyping (as everyone knows I am ALL for "hyping" -creating momentum, actually-), there wouldn't have been any NDA violation simply stating that VRC was in active discussion for a credit card company to include it in it's rooster of clients. Truth, no details, and same hype... only with people in the forums -people like me and others- clarifying pros and cons long before vote submissions.

Instead, the band that can't shoot straight, makes the announcement several months before it can be implemented, with a company that no one knows and, apparently, at a cost no one will ever be willing to pay -because it isn't worth it not even remotely-. Wow, not only children running the ship but not the sharpest children you could find.

In any event, as stated above, this deal will probably never materialize. If it does will be yet another negative for Vericoin for no one will use it and, above all, it isn't anything different -only bigger fees and payment in advance-, from the link to Moolah in the wallet... only a portable link in plastic. To even dedicate two minutes to think, let alone discuss it, is just a total waste of time.

All assumptions...no hard facts to anything you say! Your just talking out of your ass, just baseless accusations and no hard facts! Endless speculation...

Any intelligent person reading your post would see you here to stir the pot and cause doubts in the investor. Endless pages of incoherent rants and ramblings. That's all you bring here, no ideas, no solutions, no positive thoughts on how Vericoin can be something different then all the other alt coins. And no Vericoin World Day was not a good idea! I doubt your even an investor in this coin or ever were...

The reason you haven't stopped is because you love the attention you get in this thread....including my reply.
MAD945
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532



View Profile
August 25, 2014, 05:52:33 PM
 #14236

And just as I was typing this you posted three more times...all negative and none productive rantings and ramblings. I rest my case...
Wreathy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 141

Follow ur gut instinct, it is there for a reason.


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2014, 05:55:43 PM
 #14237

Take you seriously because?.


Since I had already wasted my time, here it is:




Investing123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157


CryptoCalc.org - Altcoin Profit/Loss Calculator


View Profile WWW
August 25, 2014, 06:13:54 PM
 #14238

Only 10 hours left to buy your VeriCoin T-shirts and hats!

https://shop.moolah.io/VRClothes


barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 06:22:46 PM
 #14239

Take you seriously because?.


Since I had already wasted my time, here it is:





Damn right.

But you and a the rabid, myopic idiots will never see the light.

Instead you are selling this shit to people and expect Jane and Joe Sixpack to even consider it: https://www.vericoin.info/

No need to add a thing...
altcoinUK
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 06:24:53 PM
 #14240

And just as I was typing this you posted three more times...all negative and none productive rantings and ramblings. I rest my case...

Actually Barrabas is right about Veribit, Verisend and VeriSMS. All are completely useless functions and certainly don't put vericoin in the league of innovative coins. No wonder the statistic indicates the three features have 9 users worldwide (from the 9 users 3 are the developers). Hardly creative and innovative ideas like Veribit, Verisend and VeriSMS are not good enough, no wonder the price is 9k.
Pages: « 1 ... 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 [712] 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 ... 963 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!