The trust system is being abused.

[Tomatocage]

Acknowledged. I would still rather investors be warned, but in your case I think you've put some honest effort into this. I'll remove my neg rating with this account, but I will create a new account (whose ratings won't turn you red automatically) and re apply the cautionary trust. Thanks for your understanding.

[NxtChg]

Acknowledged. I would still rather investors be warned, but in your case I think you've put some honest effort into this. I'll remove my neg rating with this account, but I will create a new account (whose ratings won't turn you red automatically) and re apply the cautionary trust. Thanks for your understanding.

Fair enough. I am glad you turned out to be a reasonable person

I removed my rating for you too. After all, trying to warn people about scams is a noble goal, however ineffective it might be in practice.

[Tomatocage]

No sweat man...sometimes I'm a little trigger happy with the negative ratings

[EndlessStory]

If talking about "Risked BTC" there could be a system for this. Like there could be "trade invitation" where you could send a trade invite to other member with form of bitcoin amount to be traded, and only If other person accepts the invitation and one of those two person scams, "BTC risked" feedback could be left. And for other things like trolling and other there could be other trust system. Like on many forums there are market feedbacks and just normal feedbacks.

[pandher]

If talking about "Risked BTC" there could be a system for this. Like there could be "trade invitation" where you could send a trade invite to other member with form of bitcoin amount to be traded, and only If other person accepts the invitation and one of those two person scams, "BTC risked" feedback could be left. And for other things like trolling and other there could be other trust system. Like on many forums there are market feedbacks and just normal feedbacks.

This idea of a trade invitation system is good