Bitcoin Forum
December 08, 2016, 12:20:00 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Butterfly Labs - Bitforce Single and Mini Rig Box  (Read 176443 times)
The00Dustin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 806


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 09:09:45 AM
 #1181

Sounds like your main pool does support nrolltime and you do that on the work you are given with the LP, but the pool is still too overloaded to give out work when you finish it.  Are you using --failover-only?  If you aren't, then maybe the work after the LP is for a different pool and your main pool is that far behind.  If you are, then the failover takes longer now, that's listed in the changelog, so that could explain the idle time.
1481199600
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481199600

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481199600
Reply with quote  #2

1481199600
Report to moderator
1481199600
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481199600

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481199600
Reply with quote  #2

1481199600
Report to moderator
1481199600
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481199600

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481199600
Reply with quote  #2

1481199600
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 05:12:59 PM
 #1182

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

http://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 05:17:14 PM
 #1183

oh ignore the time on that pc it was less than an hour ago
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 423



View Profile
May 11, 2012, 09:09:45 PM
 #1184

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

http://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 10:14:10 PM
 #1185

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

http://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 423



View Profile
May 11, 2012, 10:22:53 PM
 #1186

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

http://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

I ran for 12 hours and it wasn't improving. I went back to 832 and U is back to what I expect. I will try the 862 again later.
-ck
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2012, 10:28:10 PM
 #1187

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

http://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

I ran for 12 hours and it wasn't improving. I went back to 832 and U is back to what I expect. I will try the 862 again later.
I wonder... if it's a recurring problem and you confirm it every time, it is possible the device isn't actually hashing at that rate and is conveniently losing work...

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
Pooled mine at kano.is, solo mine at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 12, 2012, 12:49:09 AM
 #1188

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

http://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

I ran for 12 hours and it wasn't improving. I went back to 832 and U is back to what I expect. I will try the 862 again later.
I wonder... if it's a recurring problem and you confirm it every time, it is possible the device isn't actually hashing at that rate and is conveniently losing work...
Damn - looks like I gotta setup a windows USB boot and flash my BFL to see what's going on ...
Only available on Windows ... yeah that was a good idea ... NOT

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333


View Profile
May 12, 2012, 02:01:57 AM
 #1189

yah my U: is 11.62 and its been pretty steady all day and my pool hashrate has shown an increase i am very happy with it.
also after i flashed it the first time it was slower but when i flashed it the second time and unpluged it was faster so id reccommend unpluging it and plugging it back in and flashing it again. mine is a rev 3
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 423



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 05:46:08 AM
 #1190

If we can continue on in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80497 it makes the most sense to me. I will be posting an update there. Hope you all will to if its related to the newer firmware.
terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 09:04:05 PM
 #1191

If we can continue on in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80497 it makes the most sense to me. I will be posting an update there. Hope you all will to if its related to the newer firmware.
But I have the first reply to this thread.
Fuzzy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 10:43:44 PM
 #1192

Just saw BFLs next offering:



666 Terahashs/s

ALL the kilowatts
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
May 12, 2012, 10:52:42 PM
 #1193

If you only knew how close to the truth that is!

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
BFL-Engineer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227



View Profile WWW
May 12, 2012, 10:54:22 PM
 #1194

Just saw BFLs next offering:



666 Terahashs/s

ALL the kilowatts


Epic !!!

BF Labs Inc.  www.butterflylabs.com   -  Bitcoin Mining Hardware
Fuzzy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 11:21:45 PM
 #1195

Oh yeah, I almost forgot the user interface...



BlackPrapor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 584



View Profile
May 13, 2012, 04:28:58 AM
 #1196

 Grin both are just epic

There is no place like 127.0.0.1
In blockchain we trust
ice_chill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
May 14, 2012, 10:33:03 AM
 #1197

Is this something to worry about ?



https://wyobiz.wy.gov/Business/ViewCertificate.aspx
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
May 14, 2012, 10:35:58 AM
 #1198

nah

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  OpenVPN 2GB Free  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
ice_chill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336


View Profile
May 14, 2012, 11:11:16 AM
 #1199

I hope they reply otherwise I am ordering my bank to reverse my Mini-Rig payment.

I overreacted Smiley sorry
 
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
May 14, 2012, 11:13:59 AM
 #1200

dont be scurred

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  OpenVPN 2GB Free  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!