Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 05:34:26 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Butterfly Labs - Bitforce Single and Mini Rig Box  (Read 186878 times)
The00Dustin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 807
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 09:09:45 AM
 #1181

Sounds like your main pool does support nrolltime and you do that on the work you are given with the LP, but the pool is still too overloaded to give out work when you finish it.  Are you using --failover-only?  If you aren't, then maybe the work after the LP is for a different pool and your main pool is that far behind.  If you are, then the failover takes longer now, that's listed in the changelog, so that could explain the idle time.
1710826466
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710826466

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710826466
Reply with quote  #2

1710826466
Report to moderator
1710826466
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710826466

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710826466
Reply with quote  #2

1710826466
Report to moderator
1710826466
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710826466

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710826466
Reply with quote  #2

1710826466
Report to moderator
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 05:12:59 PM
 #1182

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

https://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 05:17:14 PM
 #1183

oh ignore the time on that pc it was less than an hour ago
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 446
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 11, 2012, 09:09:45 PM
 #1184

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

https://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 1794


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 11, 2012, 10:14:10 PM
 #1185

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

https://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 446
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 11, 2012, 10:22:53 PM
 #1186

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

https://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

I ran for 12 hours and it wasn't improving. I went back to 832 and U is back to what I expect. I will try the 862 again later.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4046
Merit: 1622


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
May 11, 2012, 10:28:10 PM
 #1187

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

https://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

I ran for 12 hours and it wasn't improving. I went back to 832 and U is back to what I expect. I will try the 862 again later.
I wonder... if it's a recurring problem and you confirm it every time, it is possible the device isn't actually hashing at that rate and is conveniently losing work...

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 1794


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
May 12, 2012, 12:49:09 AM
 #1188

heres a screenshot of mine mining with the 862 firmware

https://i.imgur.com/dqOYX.jpg

runs great thx

Runs great on mine too. However, even though the Hash rate is increased, the performance is decreased. I can not figure out why but when I went back to 832 I am doing better than at 862.
Um - you did run for a day and ensure that your U: was really lower right?
As I've mentioned in a few places already, I've had a >6% variance of U: last for 3.5 hours once.
(so a -6% variance over that length of time is obviously quite possible also)

I ran for 12 hours and it wasn't improving. I went back to 832 and U is back to what I expect. I will try the 862 again later.
I wonder... if it's a recurring problem and you confirm it every time, it is possible the device isn't actually hashing at that rate and is conveniently losing work...
Damn - looks like I gotta setup a windows USB boot and flash my BFL to see what's going on ...
Only available on Windows ... yeah that was a good idea ... NOT

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
abbeytim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 438
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 12, 2012, 02:01:57 AM
 #1189

yah my U: is 11.62 and its been pretty steady all day and my pool hashrate has shown an increase i am very happy with it.
also after i flashed it the first time it was slower but when i flashed it the second time and unpluged it was faster so id reccommend unpluging it and plugging it back in and flashing it again. mine is a rev 3
jddebug
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 446
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 05:46:08 AM
 #1190

If we can continue on in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80497 it makes the most sense to me. I will be posting an update there. Hope you all will to if its related to the newer firmware.
terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 501



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 09:04:05 PM
 #1191

If we can continue on in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=80497 it makes the most sense to me. I will be posting an update there. Hope you all will to if its related to the newer firmware.
But I have the first reply to this thread.
Fuzzy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 10:43:44 PM
 #1192

Just saw BFLs next offering:



666 Terahashs/s

ALL the kilowatts
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
May 12, 2012, 10:52:42 PM
 #1193

If you only knew how close to the truth that is!

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
BFL-Engineer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
May 12, 2012, 10:54:22 PM
 #1194

Just saw BFLs next offering:



666 Terahashs/s

ALL the kilowatts


Epic !!!

BF Labs Inc.  www.butterflylabs.com   -  Bitcoin Mining Hardware
Fuzzy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 12, 2012, 11:21:45 PM
 #1195

Oh yeah, I almost forgot the user interface...



BlackPrapor
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 626
Merit: 504



View Profile WWW
May 13, 2012, 04:28:58 AM
 #1196

 Grin both are just epic

There is no place like 127.0.0.1
In blockchain we trust
ice_chill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 14, 2012, 10:33:03 AM
 #1197

Is this something to worry about ?



https://wyobiz.wy.gov/Business/ViewCertificate.aspx
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
May 14, 2012, 10:35:58 AM
 #1198

nah

ice_chill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 14, 2012, 11:11:16 AM
Last edit: May 14, 2012, 12:42:40 PM by ice_chill
 #1199

I hope they reply otherwise I am ordering my bank to reverse my Mini-Rig payment.

I overreacted Smiley sorry
 
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
May 14, 2012, 11:13:59 AM
 #1200

dont be scurred

Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!