Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 04:24:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Weird fees.  (Read 1388 times)
gmaxwell (OP)
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382



View Profile WWW
January 31, 2012, 12:34:17 AM
 #1

There have been a number of incidents of transactions with weird very high fees (e.g. 170 btc) in the last few months.  Some people had assumed that these were just miners fooling around with their own money (perhaps a retarded kind of money laundering),  but I saw one today that was that I know broadcast long before it was mined (because I, and the other p2pool miners were greedily looking at it in out memory pools):

https://blockexplorer.com/tx/7b3cb56b11507c45930825af4bb5aecfc6904840834cea86413743af0066fe4f

The interesting points here is that the fee is some not round value (doesn't look like someone manually punching in a high fee), that the transaction appears to still have a change output, that the fee is much larger than several of the inputs (so they could have simply been dropped).

I'm concerned that there might be a client out there with broken coin selection code.  Thoughts?
1714148661
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714148661

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714148661
Reply with quote  #2

1714148661
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714148661
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714148661

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714148661
Reply with quote  #2

1714148661
Report to moderator
1714148661
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714148661

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714148661
Reply with quote  #2

1714148661
Report to moderator
1714148661
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714148661

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714148661
Reply with quote  #2

1714148661
Report to moderator
Revalin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


165YUuQUWhBz3d27iXKxRiazQnjEtJNG9g


View Profile
January 31, 2012, 12:43:17 AM
 #2

We saw one maybe a month ago that was pretty clearly an overflow bug where someone was storing satoshis in an int32.  This one's not that; it's almost like someone swapped the fee and the change.  But I doubt it's a regular client or we'd see more of it.

I'm not sure there's anything to be done about it unless someone posts here wondering what happened to their coins.

      War is God's way of teaching Americans geography.  --Ambrose Bierce
Bitcoin is the Devil's way of teaching geeks economics.  --Revalin 165YUuQUWhBz3d27iXKxRiazQnjEtJNG9g
kais3r
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 02, 2012, 12:15:42 AM
 #3

We saw one maybe a month ago that was pretty clearly an overflow bug where someone was storing satoshis in an int32.  This one's not that; it's almost like someone swapped the fee and the change.  But I doubt it's a regular client or we'd see more of it.

I'm not sure there's anything to be done about it unless someone posts here wondering what happened to their coins.
its probably a typo  Cheesy
kais3r
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 02, 2012, 12:17:32 AM
 #4

I don't think bitcoins will be worth much by the time this happens.
deepceleron
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1025



View Profile WWW
February 02, 2012, 06:00:16 AM
Last edit: February 02, 2012, 11:22:23 PM by deepceleron
 #5

That is an odd and generous amount to donate to a pool op.

Total BTC in: 522.51237158 (10 inputs)
Total BTC out: 500.01087158
(Fee: 22.5015)

Outputs:
0.01087158
500

I hope it wasn't a bug in mainline! Maybe a multi-send gone wrong where the second destination wasn't included in the transaction? The fee amount doesn't seem to have any correspondence with any input values or sums of input values, and there were several little change amounts included from the wallet to get up to the desired input value of 522.51237158.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!